Daily postings
from the Keystone State Education Coalition now reach more than 1000
Pennsylvania education policymakers – school directors, administrators,
legislators and members of the press via emails, website, Facebook and Twitter.
Follow us
on Twitter at @lfeinberg
“By almost every educational measure, the Agora Cyber
Charter School
is failing. By Wall Street standards, though, Agora is a
remarkable success that has helped enrich K12 Inc., the publicly traded company that
manages the school. And the entire enterprise is paid for by taxpayers.”
Profits and Questions at Online Charter Schools
New York Times By STEPHANIE
SAUL, Published: December 12, 2011
By almost every educational measure, the Agora Cyber
Charter School
is failing.
Nearly 60 percent of its
students are behind grade level in math. Nearly 50 percent trail in reading. A
third do not graduate on time. And hundreds of children, from kindergartners to
seniors, withdraw within months after they enroll.
By Wall Street
standards, though, Agora is a remarkable success that has helped enrich K12 Inc., the publicly traded company that
manages the school. And the entire enterprise is paid for by taxpayers.
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/12/13/education/online-schools-score-better-on-wall-street-than-in-classrooms.html?pagewanted=1&_r=1&hpw
NY Times Graphic: Lagging in Performance: Pennsylvania Online Schools
http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2011/12/13/us/lagging-in-performance-pennsylvania-online-schools.html?ref=education
Previous KSEC Coverage of K12 Inc.
It's
all about the kids......K12 Inc. chief executive Ron Packard paid $5 million
compensation package in 2011
Pay charters actual
costs Establish uniform tuition
As lawmakers and Gov.
Tom Corbett accelerate the move to alternative forms of public education, they
continue to ignore funding disparities that adversely affect school districts
and taxpayers.
Charter schools,
including those conducted over the Internet, attract more students every year.
Because the Legislature has not corrected the disparities first detailed by
Auditor General Jack Wagner, costs to taxpayers also will grow.
Read
more: http://thetimes-tribune.com/opinion/pay-charters-actual-costs-establish-uniform-tuition-1.1243720#ixzz1gPbryvam
PSERs BOARD OF TRUSTEES SETS EMPLOYER RATE OF 12.36% FOR FY 2012-2013
PSERS
Press Release December
9, 2011
Employer
rate of 12.36% certified for FY 2012-2013; Investment performance also reported
HARRISBURG , PA –
The Public School Employees Retirement System (PSERS) Board of Trustees met today
in Harrisburg
and certified an employer contribution rate of 12.36% for fiscal year (FY)
2012-2013, which begins July 1, 2012
http://www.psers.state.pa.us/content/news/press_release/2011%201209%20Sept%2030%202011%20inv%20perf%20FINAL.pdf
Legislature Sucker-Punches Voters Again
Chuck Ballard is a member of the East Penn School
District Board of Directors, but this statement represents only his personal
opinion, not that of the East Penn District or Board.
East Penn School Board member says vouchers are Harrisburg 's latest attempt to pull the wool
over taxpayers' eyes.
To the
Editor:
For
years, the legislature has bamboozled voters with a simple ploy. They tell you
that they haven't raised taxes, then they send mandates they won't pay for down
to local school boards that are forced to raise property taxes to pay for them.
Even worse, legislators then turn around and blame school boards for the
problem of high property taxes. The truth is, because of this ploy, districts
like East Penn now get less than 20 percent of their
budgets from the state, and local taxpayers are stuck for over 80 percent of
the cost, when it used to be a 50-50 split.
Now
that taxpayer righteous anger about property taxes is making that ploy
unusable, the legislature is trying a new one, vouchers.
http://lowermacungie.patch.com/articles/letter-to-the-editor-legislature-sucker-punches-voters-again
OP-ED CONTRIBUTORS
Class Matters. Why Won’t We Admit It?
New York Times By HELEN F. LADD and
EDWARD B. FISKE, Published: December 11, 2011
NO one seriously
disputes the fact that students from disadvantaged households perform less well
in school, on average, than their peers from more advantaged backgrounds. But
rather than confront this fact of life head-on, our policy makers mistakenly
continue to reason that, since they cannot change the backgrounds of students,
they should focus on things they can control.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.