Started in November 2010, daily postings from the Keystone State
Education Coalition now reach more than 4050 Pennsylvania education
policymakers – school directors, administrators, legislators, legislative and
congressional staffers, Governor's staff, current/former PA Secretaries of
Education, Wolf education transition team members, superintendents, school solicitors,
principals, charter school leaders, PTO/PTA officers, parent advocates, teacher
leaders, business leaders, faith-based organizations, labor organizations,
education professors, members of the press and a broad array of P-16 regulatory
agencies, professional associations and education advocacy organizations via
emails, website, Facebook, Twitter, Instagram and LinkedIn.
These daily emails are archived and searchable at http://keystonestateeducationcoalition.org
Follow us on Twitter at @lfeinberg
Here’s what taxpayers
in PA Senate Majority Leadership members school districts spent on cyber
charter tuition for 2017-2018
If school districts could use their actual percentage of special
education students in the special education charter school tuition calculation
instead of a fictitious number, it would save them $65 million.
Blogger note: over the past year we have
been publishing 2016-2017 cyber charter tuition data. We just received the
2017-2018 data set this morning and will be pushing it out during the summer.
If the state would take on the cost of
cyber charter school tuition since the state is responsible for authorizing and
overseeing cyber charter schools, it would save school districts $520 million.
(PASBO)
If we adopted single, statewide tuition
rates for both regular and special education students that were tied to the
actual costs of providing cyber education we could save taxpayers $250 million
each year. (Education Voters PA)
Jake
Corman
|
R
|
Centre
|
$7,688,506.77
|
John
Gordner
|
R
|
Columbia
|
$12,941,301.51
|
Bob
Mensch
|
R
|
Berks
|
$12,326,052.21
|
Ryan
Aument
|
R
|
Lancaster
|
$9,175,841.22
|
Patrick
Browne
|
R
|
Lehigh
|
$10,444,374.84
|
Kim
Ward
|
R
|
Westmoreland
|
$12,389,531.70
|
David
Argall
|
R
|
Schuylkill
|
$14,333,077.74
|
Data Source PDE via
PSBA
'Nobody is going to go to heaven.’ Pa. budget deal
divides Democrats
Post-Gazette by SASHA HUPKA Harrisburg Bureau JUL 8, 2019 8:00 AM
HARRISBURG — When
the state budget wrapped up recently, Democratic Gov. Tom Wolf could boast that
he navigated yet another budget season without any major clashes with the
Republican-controlled Legislature. Instead, it was the progressives within the
governor’s own party who left the state Capitol this year feeling shortchanged.
The nearly $34 billion budget bill, which Mr. Wolf has signed, contained few of
their legislative priorities. Though it boosts money for public education —
long one of Mr. Wolf’s priorities — it siphons money from environmental
protection efforts, lacks an increase to the state’s $7.25-per-hour minimum
wage, and strips funding for a cash assistance program that helps
Pennsylvania’s poorest residents. Democratic lawmakers, including some newly
elected in a progressive wave last year, balked at some of the missing items.
Though they stopped short of publicly directly criticizing Mr. Wolf and their
leadership, they expressed frustration that they did not have greater input in
the process, which produced a plan that they believe abandons their ideals.
“Like many of his colleagues in the
General Assembly, Corman is a recipient of a generous public welfare program
that gives lawmakers who live outside a 50-mile radius of Harrisburg an allowance of about $187 per day to cover food, lodging, dry cleaning, and other incidentals not
covered by their $88,610 base salaries. The allowance doesn’t require receipts. No questions
asked. No monitoring of how the money is spent. No chance at all for fraud,
waste, or abuse.
In 2015, Corman collected $9,861 in per
diems, and about half that in 2016. In all, taxpayers spent $2.5 million on per
diems, covering about 250 legislators. According to a report by pennlive.com, a top recipient was Pat Browne, who collected $23,574 in 2016.
(Per diems are based on the number of days spent in Harrisburg, and vary with
each lawmaker.)”
Pa. lawmakers kill general assistance, but keep their own
welfare program | Editorial
The Inquirer Editorial Board | opinion@inquirer.com Updated: July 9, 2019 - 5:00 AM
Charges of
hypocrisy rarely hit their intended targets — mainly because hypocrites are
blind to their own role in irony or injustice. The elected state lawmakers who
voted last month to
eliminate a general assistance program that helped the most desperate and needy of people in the state have this
blindness. Currently, about 10,000 people get grants of $200 per month — $2,400
per year — to help cover basic needs. This has been a popular target; general
assistance was eliminated in 2012 but the Supreme Court found it
unconstitutional. At that time, the program served 60,000 of the neediest
Pennsylvanians. The issue went viral last month when, during a hearing on the
topic, State Senator Katie Muth tried to read a letter from John Boyd, a
general assistance recipient, explaining what a huge difference this small
amount of money made to his life. Muth’s reading was
shouted down by
Republican Majority Leader Jake Corman. The exchange generated outraged
attention by presidential candidates and other national figures. Corman has called
the general assistance program flawed because of the lack of monitoring of how
the money is spent by participants.
National teacher
shortage affects Pennsylvania
Observer Reporter
by Karen Mansfield Jul 7, 2019 Updated 19 hrs ago
The United States,
including Pennsylvania, is dealing with a teacher shortage. Since 1996, the
number of undergraduate education majors has declined 55%. Additionally, since
2009, the number of newly issued in-state instructional teaching certificates
has dropped by 71%, according to the Pennsylvania Department of Education. Pennsylvania
used to issue licenses to more than 14,000 new teachers annually. In 2016-17,
the state issued 4,412. Dr. Diane Fine, a professor at California University of
Pennsylvania’s College of Education, has watched the decline in the ranks of
students seeking education degrees across all disciplines. Fall enrollment for
education majors at the university has dropped below 551 each year since 2014. In
the fall of 2018, 452 aspiring teachers enrolled in Cal’s education program,
almost 100 fewer than in 2014. “These are definitely challenging times, no
doubt, in education. I tell my students that they’re entering teaching at a
challenging time,” said Fine. “It is tougher to recruit students into education
programs.” The teacher shortage is most pronounced in math and science, with
graduates joining the corporate world – including STEM fields – where jobs
offer greater pay and stability. While Canon-McMillan School District continues
to draw quality teacher candidates, the pool of candidates is getting shallower
in those fields, along with foreign language, said Superintendent Michael
Daniels.
Your View by
education major: Why armed guards not the answer to school shootings
By SHELBY
HAHNER | THE MORNING CALL | JUL 08, 2019 | 9:00 AM
As a college senior
preparing to enter the workforce with an education degree, I am taxed with the
same question all teachers before me have asked themselves: How am I going to
keep my kids safe? This question takes on a new meaning for the upcoming
generation of young professionals as the threat of school shootings looms ever
present. Though I ask myself this same question with uncertainty, I do know the
answer is not with armed officials. Armed guards in schools should not be used
to decrease the number of school shootings.
School shootings are not frequent occurrences, despite what news
coverage may suggest. A Washington
Post piece by David Ropeik, an
instructor at Harvard and author of “How Risky Is It, Really? Why Our Fears
Don’t Always Match the Facts," puts the likelihood of a student falling
victim to death via school shooting on any given day at 1 in 614 million. That
number does not take away from the tragedy of the life of a child being cut
short in a place meant for learning and growing. However, allocating funding
and personnel to prevent an event with such a small likelihood seems foolish,
especially if the funding is coming from the already stretched budgets meant
for educational purposes. Anyone working within schools can see money for
staff, supplies and programs should not be spread even thinner. Particularly
not for the sake of arming guards to stand at the ready in case of a school shooting
that is wildly unlikely to happen.
https://www.mcall.com/opinion/mc-opi-school-shootings-20190708-fmaifuymlraepji6boaycose2i-story.html
Pa. is right to give
schools the room to make their own choices on security | Opinion
By Kim Stolfer and Greg Archetto Capital-Star
Op-Ed Contributors July 9, 2019
A recent
Capital-Star op-Ed jointly authored by CeaseFire Pennsylvania and the Education Law
Center took aim at legislation that had been passed by both the Pennsylvania
House and Senate (SB621) which focuses on school security. While this legislation was
recently signed into law by Gov. Tom Wolf, their issue is the supposed
diabolical plan to “arm teachers” in schools, despite no such language being
included in the bill. Of specific concern is language creating “school security
guards” which these organizations feel could be a “back door” to arming
teachers and other school staff. We still feel it is important to address
these fallacies put forth, in this joint op-Ed. First of all, the legislation
sponsored by Sen. Mike Regan, R-Cumberland, does not require anyone to carry a
firearm. It has stringent training requirements for those authorized to
do so. To those worried that a “math teacher” could be considered a
“security guard,” is not the difference between an armed and well-trained
security guard versus and armed and well-trained teacher simply a snappy
uniform?
“We have created a culture where guns
and violence are worshipped and the victims and survivors are left to fend for
themselves in the wake of severe trauma. Our legislative bodies have done very
little to protect anyone from gun violence, and yet some of them tout their
dedication to gun violence prevention right here in Pennsylvania. But they
voted in favor of SB 621. We have created a plan for our schools’
safety that trains children from early ages to expect a shooter to enter their
school, we ask that they run, hide, and ultimately sacrifice themselves to save
their classmates, like Kendrick Castillo did at STEM.
Yet we have not funded dedicated mental
health counselors in all schools, we have not expanded access to quality mental
health care, and we have not provided our children with adequate socio-emotional
learning programs like peer mediation and conflict resolution.”
From a Columbine
survivor: New Pa. law allowing more armed guards won’t make our schools any
safer | Opinion
By Jami Amo Capital-Star Op-Ed Contributor July 9, 2019
Last Tuesday, Gov.
Tom Wolf signed a bill
(SB621) into law creating
new categories of armed security guards for our schools. Aware of great concern
about and opposition to arming teachers, Wolf issued a
signing statement saying
this bill does not and will not allow the arming of teachers. For many, the
idea of more armed security might bring comfort. But for me, the passage and
signing of this bill is a sign that our legislature is so weak they cannot bear
to stand up for even the youngest children in our schools. First of all,
statewide, funding per student by district varies so widely; disparity is
obvious already. An increase in funding will allot fiscal space to provide
these armed Security Officers, though some regions simply don’t have the
resources to dedicate. Third-party security firms will be granted permission to
enter these roles as long as they meet the conditions laid out in the bill.
This is unacceptable to me aside from the obvious false claim that more guns
equate to more safety.
“Schools must apply to establish a
program for flexible instructional days and provide a plan detailing how they
will notify students, parents and staff when a flexible instructional day is
used; how they’ll accommodate students with insufficient technology or internet
access and students with special needs; and the responsibilities of students
and staff. Those plans must be approved by the Pennsylvania Department of
Education.”
Snow days aren't
going anywhere — for now, at least — despite new 'flexible instructional day'
law
Lancaster Online by
ALEX GELI | Staff
Writer July 9,
2019
Are we witnessing
the snow day’s demise?
Not quite — at
least not in Lancaster County, school officials told LNP.
Gov. Tom Wolf last
week signed a
bill into
law that allows school districts to use up to five “flexible instructional
days” during the academic year starting in 2019-20. When schools are forced to
close due to an emergency, districts with a state-approved plan may provide
online instruction rather than losing one of the required 180 school days — and
making it up later on. The legislation was cosponsored by Lancaster County
Republican Sens. Ryan Aument and Scott Martin. While many Lancaster County
school officials say they’re intrigued by the idea, implementing such a program
would involve significant roadblocks, they say. “On the surface, it may sound
like a worthwhile idea,” Donegal Superintendent Michael Lausch said. “However,
there are several issues for which careful planning must occur in order to make
flexible instructional days something that is considered in Donegal.” Among the
challenges, Lausch and others said, were students’ at-home internet access,
serving students with special needs and English language learners, as well as
creating assignments that fit the curriculum.
Missing computers turn up at Harrisburg School District
Penn Live By Christine Vendel | cvendel@pennlive.com Posted Jul 8, 6:20 PM
Computers that had
gone missing from the Harrisburg School District have now mysteriously turned
up, school officials confirmed Monday. We are now able to account for all
computers,” said John George, the district’s new Financial Recovery Plan
Service Director when asked by PennLive. “At this moment, I am unable to
provide any other information.” Pennsylvania State Police are investigating. George
would not provide any additional details about the mysterious disappearance and
reappearance of the computers, including whether they were simply misplaced,
how or where they turned up and whether any data or documents were missing from
them. If electronic files were deleted from the computers, a forensic
reconstruction might be able to identify what was deleted. The computers
containing key financial records were discovered missing last Monday by a team
of new administrative staffers brought in by the newly-appointed Receiver of
the school district, Janet Samuels. The new team had been on the job less than
24 hours when they discovered the missing computers, which vanished amid a
mass-firing of the superintendent, acting business manager and seven others.
‘Teachers can’t become political targets’: Central H.S.
teacher fires back at ex-Pa. GOP chair
Inquirer by Kristen A. Graham, Updated: July 8, 2019- 4:07 PM
Thomas Quinn won
accolades for his successful campaign to register Philly 18-year-olds to vote,
a volunteer effort he launched in addition to a busy schedule teaching social
studies at Central High School. But with a month to go before last fall’s election,
Quinn was jolted — and briefly stopped in his tracks — by an accusation from an
unlikely person: then-Pennsylvania state Republican Party Chairman Val
DiGiorgio said Quinn
was engaging in “liberal indoctrination." Quinn
had never met DiGiorgio, but the
1985 Central graduate said he had evidence of the teacher engaging in partisan
political activity in violation of Philadelphia School District policy.
DiGiorgio wrote to Superintendent William R. Hite Jr., calling Quinn’s conduct
“a very serious matter” and took his story to the media, showing a photo of what
the GOP chair said was an anti-Republican flier Quinn handed out to students. But
the photo DiGiorgio circulated, Quinn said, was a cropped shot of several
political posters hanging in a Central staff room. The poster admittedly had a
liberal bent, Quinn said, but it hung in a space that has featured others
praising President Ronald Reagan and President Donald Trump, and it was never
circulated to students. Quinn was cleared by the district of any charges of
political indoctrination, but did receive a disciplinary memo for hanging a
partisan poster in a school space.
State could seek $40M after probe finds Indiana Virtual
School inflated enrollment — even counting a student who had died
Chalkbeat BY STEPHANIE WANG July 8, 2019
Two school years
after a student died, Indiana Virtual School kept him on its rolls and received
state funding to educate him. Five years after two students moved to Florida,
they reappeared on enrollment records for Indiana Virtual School and its sister
school. And nearly every one of the more than 900 students kicked out of
Indiana Virtual School and its sister school in the 2017-18 school year for
being inactive were re-enrolled the next school year, included in per-pupil
funding calculations that netted the two online schools more than $34 million
in public dollars last year.
These were among
the ways that Indiana Virtual School and Indiana Virtual Pathways Academy
allegedly inflated their enrollment to at least twice its actual size,
according to the findings of a state examiner’s investigation released Monday. Now,
the state could demand that the schools — slated to close next year amid
widespread mismanagement — return about $40 million in funding for students
they never educated. The Indiana State Board of Education is set to discuss at its Wednesday meeting whether to claw back money from the
virtual schools, which have been the subject of numerous Chalkbeat articles
examining financial conflicts of interest and dismal academic performance.
Board members could vote to recover half of the money that the schools received
over the past three years by reducing state funding going forward. But the
virtual schools’ superintendent Percy Clark said that if the state asks for its
money back, the schools will be unable to pay for teachers and educational
services — which “means the end of the road for the Schools and most of their
students.”
PSBA Members: State Budget Webcast JUL 9, 2019 • 12:00 PM - 1:00 PM
Join PSBA government affairs experts for an in-depth look at the 2019-20
state budget and related School Code bills. What do the new numbers and policy
changes mean for your school district, teachers and students? Bring your
questions to this complimentary webcast for members!
Presenters: PSBA Chief
Advocacy Officer John Callahan, Director of Government Affairs Jonathan Berger
and Director of Research Andy Christ. This webcast is for PSBA members only. Members
may register at no cost online through PSBA’s webconferencing host: https://register.gotowebinar.com/register/7177219780206800141.
The deadline to
submit a cover letter, resume and application is August 19,
2019.
Become a 2019-2020 PSBA Advocacy Ambassador
PSBA is seeking
applications for two open Advocacy Ambassador positions. Candidates
should have experience in day-to-day functions of a school district,
on the school board, or in a school leadership position. The purpose of the
PSBA Advocacy Ambassador program is to facilitate the education and engagement
of local school directors and public education stakeholders through the
advocacy leadership of the ambassadors. Each Advocacy Ambassador will
be responsible for assisting PSBA in achieving its advocacy goals. To
achieve their mission, ambassadors will be kept up to date on current
legislation and PSBA positions on legislation. The current open
positions will cover PSBA Sections 3 and 4, and
Section 7.
PSBA Advocacy
Ambassadors are independent contractors representing PSBA and serve
as liaisons between PSBA and their local elected officials. Advocacy
Ambassadors also commit to building strong relationships with PSBA members with
the purpose of engaging the designated members to be active and committed
grassroots advocates for PSBA’s legislative priorities.
PSBA: Nominations for The Allwein Society are open!
This award program
recognizes school directors who are outstanding leaders & advocates on
behalf of public schools & students. Nominations are accepted year-round
with selections announced early fall: http://ow.ly/CchG50uDoxq
EPLC is accepting
applications for the 2019-20 PA Education Policy Fellowship Program
Education Policy & Leadership Center
PA's premier education policy leadership program for education, policy
& community leaders with 582 alumni since 1999. Application with program
schedule & agenda are at http://www.eplc.org
2019 PASA-PSBA School
Leadership Conference Oct. 16-18, 2019
WHERE: Hershey Lodge and
Convention Center 325 University Drive, Hershey, PA
WHEN: Wednesday, October
16 to Friday, October 18, 201
Registration is now open!
Growth from knowledge acquired. Vision inspired by innovation. Impact
created by a synergized leadership community. You are called upon to be the
drivers of a thriving public education system. It’s a complex and challenging
role. Expand your skillset and give yourself the tools needed for the
challenge. Packed into two and a half daysꟷꟷgain access to top-notch education
and insights, dynamic speakers, peer learning opportunities and the latest
product and service innovations. Come to the PASA-PSBA School Leadership
Conference to grow!
NPE Action National
Conference - Save the Date - March 28-29, 2020 in Philadelphia, PA.
The window is now open for workshop proposals for the Network for Public
Education conference, March 28-29, 2020, in Philadelphia. I hope you all sign
on to present on a panel and certainly we want all to attend. https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/NBCNDKK
Any comments contained herein are my comments, alone, and
do not necessarily reflect the opinions of any other person or organization
that I may be affiliated with.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.