Daily postings from the Keystone State Education Coalition now
reach more than 4050 Pennsylvania education policymakers – school directors,
administrators, legislators, legislative and congressional staffers, Governor's
staff, current/former PA Secretaries of Education, Wolf education transition
team members, superintendents, school solicitors, principals, charter school
leaders, PTO/PTA officers, parent advocates, teacher leaders, business leaders,
faith-based organizations, labor organizations, education professors, members
of the press and a broad array of P-16 regulatory agencies, professional
associations and education advocacy organizations via emails, website,
Facebook, Twitter, Instagram and LinkedIn
These daily emails are archived and searchable at http://keystonestateeducationcoalition.org
Follow us on Twitter at @lfeinberg
Keystone
State Education Coalition
PA Senate
Education Committee Meeting Notice
Tuesday,
January 2, 2018 1:00 PM Room 461 Main CapitolTo consider the submission of comments with regard to Pennsylvania's state plan under the Every Student Succeeds Act, pursuant to Section 126 of the Public School Code
http://www.legis.state.pa.us/cfdocs/legis/cms/index.cfm?chamber=S#01/02/2018
“However, tax policies tend to benefit
more affluent Americans rather than the low-income parents many school choice
advocates see as the most important audience. This is especially true of 529
accounts. Almost all of the benefits of 529 plans flow to households making at
least six figures and the greatest benefits flow disproportionately
to the wealthiest Americans.”
A Lousy
School Choice
Why the new tax break for private schools is
such bad policy.
US News By Andrew J. Rotherham, Opinion
Contributor | Dec. 27, 2017, at 4:00 p.m.
Education was mostly a sideshow in the massive tax
overhaul Congress passed just before Christmas. But one marginal issue passed
in the dead of night may end up playing a big role in the school choice debate
going forward. Under the new law, money from 529 college savings accounts can
now be used for private elementary and secondary education expenses. 529s are
savings accounts where you can put after-tax dollars earmarked for college
expenses (and now elementary and secondary expenses) into an account where that
money grows tax free. That change was the result of a late-night amendment by
Republican Texas Sen. Ted Cruzthat only passed with Vice President Pence
casting a tie breaking vote. The provision is lousy public policy and even many
choice advocates opposed it, but it's a big political win for proponents of
education tax credits and using the tax code rather than direct spending to
advance school choice.
EITC: This
Tax Loophole For Wealthy Donors Just Got Bigger
NPR by ANYA KAMENETZ December 28, 20176:37
AM ET
Reporters and researchers are just starting to comb
through the huge, rushed-to-passage tax package to figure out the implications.
One of the changes, according to the Institute on Taxation & Economic Policy, which advocates
for a "fair and sustainable" tax system, allows far more wealthy
donors in 10 states to turn a profit through "donations" to private
school scholarships. Yes, you read that right. If your income is high
enough, you can actually make money by giving away money to support
scholarships to private schools. The states affected by this provision are
Alabama, Arizona, Georgia, Kansas, Montana, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, Rhode
Island, South Carolina and Virginia. The mechanism at play is something called
a "tax credit scholarship" or a "neovoucher."
The Hill BY RACHEL ROUBEIN AND PETER SULLIVAN - 12/22/17
06:00 AM EST
State governments are warning that the short-term
funding for a critical children’s health program approved by Congress on
Thursday may be too little and too late. Warning letters in at least three
states have already been sent to families saying they could lose coverage for
their children come Jan. 31 without new funding from Congress. Even if the new
funding keeps their programs afloat, it sends a negative message to enrollees
and that could cause long-term implications, experts say. Alabama
announced recently it would freeze enrollment in its
program starting Jan. 1, and it’s unclear if the short-term bill will change
the state’s plans. The uncertainty over long-term funding could discourage
enrollment in the program and cause more children to go uninsured, experts say.
“It shakes confidence in government in general and certainly in this program,”
said Linda Nablo, chief deputy director of Virginia’s Department of Medical
Assistance Services. “I think we’re going to see lower enrollment for a little
while, certainly.”
Posted December 21st, 2017 for American Academy of Pediatrics
Washington, DC—The following is a joint statement from the American Academy of Pediatrics, Children's Defense Fund, Children's Dental Health Project, Children's Hospital Association, Family Voices, First Focus Campaign for Children, March of Dimes and National Association of Pediatric Nurse Practitioners:
"Federal funding for the Children's Health Insurance Program (CHIP) ran out on September 30th. There is a bipartisan agreement to renew CHIP for five years that both chambers of Congress support, and yet the CHIP funding extension included in the U.S. House of Representatives spending bill introduced today falls far short of that agreement.
"States have already started to notify families that they may not have a source of coverage should Congress fail to enact a long-term extension of CHIP funding, and several states have started to use funds meant to operate the program to start shutting it down. The short-term CHIP funding included in the House spending bill is not enough to prevent states from continuing these actions, and only causes more chaos and confusion on the ground.
"What states and families need is stability. Instead, what they get from the House measure is a continuation of a dangerous trend: temporary, inadequate CHIP funding patches, delivered at the last possible moment with no comprehensive relief or assurance.
"Congress' failure to extend CHIP funding long-term has resulted in a manufactured emergency that has real consequences for children, families and pregnant women. It doesn't have to be this way. There is bipartisan policy ready to be passed right now to extend CHIP funding for five years. Both chambers of Congress support it; the only thing preventing it from passing is political will. Congress must take the opportunity to pass a five-year CHIP funding extension on a bill this week to fund the federal government.
"Right now, the greatest threat to children's health care coverage is congressional inaction."
Editorial: Congress needs to reauthorize CHIP as soon
as possible
Lancaster Online by
The LNP Editorial Board December 29, 2017
THE
ISSUE - Congress recessed for the Christmas holiday without reauthorizing the
federal Children’s Health Insurance Program, which covers 8.9 million kids
nationwide. Some states will run out of CHIP money by the end of January, and
three-quarters of all states will exhaust their program funds by the end of
March. CHIP funding covers about 10,000 children in Lancaster County and
approximately 180,162 children statewide. The program was reauthorized at the
state level by the Pennsylvania General Assembly earlier this month. Republican
state Sens. Scott Martin, of Martic Township, and Ryan Aument, of Landisville,
voted against the reauthorization, saying they supported CHIP but opposed Gov.
Tom Wolf’s expansion of the program to permit elective procedures including gender
reassignment for children. Members of Congress
returned last week to their comfortable and holiday-bedecked homes without
ensuring health care for this nation’s low-income children.
Christmas Day may be behind us, but the Grinch comes
to mind. Fortunately, like the Grinch, members of Congress appeared to have a
collective attack of conscience in the final hours before recess. Their hearts
didn’t grow three sizes that day — season of miracles notwithstanding, that
would be unlikely — but they did remember CHIP in the stopgap spending bill
they passed to avert a government shutdown. The bill included $2.85 billion for
CHIP, a fraction of what the program needs for the year, but at least
something.
Trib Live by DEBRA ERDLEY | Thursday, Dec.
28, 2017, 11:00 p.m.
A former Westmoreland County lawmaker who sponsored
the state law that became the model for the national Children's Health
Insurance Program is going on the offensive online to save the program. Former
state Sen. Allen Kukovich of Penn Township, who served in the General Assembly
from 1977 to 2004, was the prime sponsor of a 1992 Pennsylvania law that became
the model for the national CHIP program five years later. He recently posted
an appeal on YouTube, urging voters to
call the Capitol switchboard and ask their representatives to support
reauthorization of the federal program that now provides free or low-cost
health insurance to more than 9 million children whose families earn too much
to qualify for Medicaid but not enough to purchase private insurance. The
program that insures 180,000 Pennsylvania children, including 4,797 in
Westmoreland County and 13,937 in Allegheny County, has faced the prospect of
running out of cash since Congress failed to reauthorize funding for it by
Sept. 30.
Measures
of gerrymandering — real or bogus?
WHYY By Dave Davies December 28, 2017
As courts in
Pennsylvania and around the country consider cases charging partisan political
gerrymandering, the National Constitution Center in Philadelphia recently
assembled prominent experts and participants in the battles to talk about the
political and constitutional issues. Courts have long acknowledged
gerrymandering exists, but they have lacked a reliable standard for measuring
just how much of a political edge a particular legislative map gives to one
party. In the case that’s
captured the most national attention, a federal court struck down boundaries
drawn by the Wisconsin state legislature as biased in favor of Republicans, and
the U.S. Supreme Court has heard arguments on the appeal. In the Wisconsin
case, a new mathematical formula for measuring gerrymandering made a
difference. It considers election results and measures how “efficient” each
party is with its votes while running in the boundaries at issue. If Democrats
are packed into a few districts they won by big margins — while Republicans are
strategically spread to capture many districts by narrow spreads — the
resulting “efficiency gap” measures the bias of the political boundaries. At
least, that’s the idea.
“Reducing the size of the House will not
solve all the state’s problems. But it will eliminate one dubious distinction: Pennsylvania
has the largest and most expensive full-time legislature in
the country. Each of the 203 House members is paid at least $87,000 a year,
plus $159 per diem and free health-care benefits. (Ranking members are paid
more. For example, House Speaker Mike Turzai’s salary is $135,000.) Elected
officials are eligible for a generous pension and free health care for life at
age 55 and 10 years of service.”
Let's make
government smaller, starting with state legislature | Editorial
by The Inquirer Editorial Board Updated: DECEMBER
28, 2017 — 3:01 AM EST
Time is running out on a once-in-a-decade
opportunity for the Pennsylvania legislature to reform itself, and perhaps
restore voters’ faith in Harrisburg lawmakers’ ability to govern beyond their
own self-interest. In the coming weeks, lawmakers must act
on a bill that would reduce the size of the state House by 25 percent. The
looming deadline must be met for the measure to get on the May primary ballot.
That would allow enough time for new district maps to take effect with the 2020
census. But hurdles remain. Reducing the size of the House requires amending
the state constitution. Any constitutional amendment must be approved by the
House and Senate in two consecutive legislative sessions before going to
voters. The bill was approved in the last session and awaits a second vote. But
for the past year, House Bill 153 has sat in the State Government Committee. If
lawmakers don’t act by mid-January, another decade will pass before the next
census provides an opportunity to redraw the districts.
A dozen
ways lawmakers changed the rules on Pennsylvanians in 2017
Penn Live by Jan Murphy | jmurphy@pennlive.com Posted December
28, 2017 at 06:15 AM | Updated December 28, 2017 at 06:15 AM
You bring 253 state lawmakers to the Capitol for
more than 20 weeks a year and you are sure to get a few new laws that make
living in Pennsylvania a little different somehow. In that regard, 2017 didn’t
disappoint. From buying fireworks to visiting loved ones’ gravesites, new laws
were enacted that change the way many Pennsylvanians will go about their daily
lives in 2018 and/or after. Here's a look at a few of those changes:
Ex-GOP
treasurer candidate to run for lieutenant governor
Penn Live By The Associated Press Updated Dec 28, 1:35 PM; Posted Dec
28, 1:35 PM
HARRISBURG, Pa. (AP) -- Another Republican is
getting into the race for lieutenant governor of Pennsylvania. Otto Voit, who
ran unsuccessfully last year for state treasurer, announced Thursday that he'll
seek the party's nomination in next year's election. The 60-year-old Voit is
vice president of the Muhlenberg School Board in Berks County. Also running is
former state Rep. Gordon Denlinger of Lancaster County and suburban
Philadelphia real estate investor Jeffrey Bartos. March 6 is the deadline for
major party candidates to file paperwork for the May 15 primary election
ballot. Five Democrats have lined up to contest the re-election bid of Lt. Gov.
Mike Stack in the party's primary.
Trib Live NATALIE BENEVIAT | Wednesday, Dec.
27, 2017, 9:00 p.m.
There will be a special community meeting at Hampton
Township School District regarding school start times Jan. 22, with speaker Dr.
Peter Franzen, a local expert on the subject. Franzen, an assistant professor
of psychiatry at the University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, has studied
the idea of delaying the school day, which would mostly benefit high school-age
students, and will provide input and feedback at the meeting. The Hampton
special meeting is scheduled for 7 p.m. and is open to the public. The evening
will include a 45-minute presentation by Franzen, followed by a 15-minute,
question-and-answer period for the audience. It will be held at the Hampton
High School Auditorium. Franzen is considered a local authority on the subject,
according to Shari Berg, public relations consultant for the school district.
Aside from planning the meeting, she said the district has not had any other
discussions on the idea, but just wants to obtain information from Franzen.
How Sen.
Pat Toomey turned the Republican tax bill away from populism
Washington Post By Mike DeBonis December 28
at 6:00 AM
As they scrambled to finish their sweeping tax bill
in late October, House lawmakers arrived at a surprising decision: They
wouldn’t cut the income tax rate for the wealthy. That choice broke with
conservative economic principles, which call for lower rates for high earners
to spur investment and boost the economy. But House leaders wanted to use that
money to pay for cuts elsewhere in the bill, and the White House was eager to
avoid the impression the legislation would disproportionately favor the rich
— including President Trump and his top
economic advisers. Then Sen. Patrick J. Toomey (R-Pa.) went to work. The final tax bill signed by
President Trump lowers the top individual rate to
37 percent from 39.6 percent, reflecting one of many triumphs for the
“supply-side” economic doctrine Toomey has relentlessly promoted through more
than two decades in politics over the more populist ideology of Trump’s
campaign. Behind the scenes, according to aides, lobbyists and fellow
lawmakers, Toomey played a major role in shaping the Republican tax overhaul —
pushing not only for a cut in the top individual rate but also helping slash
rates for corporations and repeal a key provision of the Affordable Care Act.
How
Citizens United Changed Politics and Shaped the Tax Bill
The real impact of an unregulated campaign
finance is on policy, and the proof is in this year’s tax bill.
Brennan Center for Justice at NYU Law School
by Lawrence Norden, Shyamala Ramakrishna, Sidni Frederick December 14, 2017
As Congress is poised to push through a historically
unpopular tax bill, it’s worth revisiting a piece by our colleague
Daniel Weiner, noting the forthrightness with which
members of Congress have made clear that donors have been driving this process.
A cynical public has long believed that “candidates who win
public office promote policies that directly help the people and groups who
donated money to their campaigns,” but rarely have we seen both officeholders and
donors themselves state this so openly. It’s worth asking: Has something
changed? We think so. But first, let’s look at some of those statements. On the
officeholder side, to take but one example, Rep. Chris
Collins (R-NY) told the Hill newspaper, “My donors are
basically saying, ‘Get it done or don’t ever call me again.’” And Steven Law, president of
the Senate Leadership
Fund and former chief of staff to Majority Leader
Sen. Mitch McConnell noted “[Donors] would be mortified if
we didn’t live up to what we’ve committed to on tax reform.” Perhaps even more
striking is the brazenness with which donors themselves are admitting they have
threatened members of Congress.
Charter
School Discussion in Philly Jan 11, 2018 8:00 - 9:30 a.m.
PCCY Email December 26, 2017
Serious flaws in Pennsylvania’s charter
school law put the quality of charter schools on the back
burner. Join PCCY for a discussion of how other states’ laws are
doing a better job and explore what makes sense in Pennsylvania. January 11, 2018 from 8:00 - 9:30 a.m., at
the United Way Building 1709 Benjamin Franklin Parkway, 19103Featured speakers include:
·
Representative
James Roebuck (D), PA
General Assembly, Democratic Chairman - Education Committee
·
Representative
Jordan Harris (D), PA
General Assembly
·
Veronica
Brooks-Uy, Policy Director,
National Association of Charter School Authorizers
·
Sharif
El-Mekki, Principal,
Mastery Charter Schools
·
Jeff
Sparagana, Ed.D, Former
Superintendent Pottstown School District
·
Doug
Carney, Former
Springfield School Board Member (24 years), SVP Children’s Hospital of
Philadelphia
·
Donna
Cooper, Executive
Director, Public Citizens for Children and Youth
·
Tomea
Sippio-Smith, Education Policy
Director, Public Citizens for Children and Youth (PCCY)
Register
for New School Director Training in December and January
PSBA Website October 2017
You’ve started a challenging and
exciting new role as a school director. Let us help you narrow the learning
curve! PSBA’s New School Director Training provides school directors with
foundational knowledge about their role, responsibilities and ethical
obligations. At this live workshop, participants will learn about key laws,
policies, and processes that guide school board governance and leadership, and
develop skills for becoming strong advocates in their community. Get the tools
you need from experts during this visually engaging and interactive event.
Choose from any of these remaining
locations and dates (note: all sessions are held 8 a.m.-4 p.m., unless
specified otherwise.):
·
Jan. 6, Haverford Middle School
·
Jan. 13, A W Beattie Career Center
·
Jan. 13, Parkland HS
Fees: Complimentary to All-Access
members or $170 per person for standard membership. All registrations will be
billed to the listed district, IU or CTC. To request billing to
an individual, please contact Michelle Kunkel at michelle.kunkel@psba.org. Registration also includes a
box lunch on site and printed resources.
NSBA 2018
Advocacy Institute February 4 - 6, 2018 Marriott Marquis, Washington D.C.
Register Now
Come a day early and attend the Equity
Symposium!
Join hundreds of public education advocates
on Capitol Hill and help shape the decisions made in Washington D.C. that
directly impact our students. At the 2018 Advocacy Institute, you’ll gain
insight into the most critical issues affecting public education, sharpen your
advocacy skills, and prepare for effective meetings with your representatives. Whether
you are an expert advocator or a novice, attend and experience inspirational
keynote speakers and education sessions featuring policymakers, legal experts
and policy influencers. All designed to help you advocate for your students and
communities.
Local School Board Members to Advocate on Capitol Hill in 2018
NSBA's Advocacy Institute 2018 entitled, "Elected. Engaged. Empowered: Representing the Voice in Public Education," will be held on February 4-6, 2018 at the Marriott Marquis in Washington, D.C. This conference will convene Members of Congress, national thought-leaders, state association executives and well-known political pundits to provide local school board members with an update on key policy and legal issues impacting public education, and tactics and strategies to enhance their ability to influence the policy-making process and national education debate during their year-round advocacy efforts.
WHAT'S NEW - ADVOCACY INSTITUTE '18?
·
Confirmed
National Speaker: Cokie Roberts, Political Commentator for NPR and ABC News
·
NSBA
will convene first ever National School Board Town Hall on School Choice
·
Includes
General Sessions featuring national policy experts, Members of Congress,
"DC Insiders" and local school board members
·
Offers
conference attendees "Beginner" and "Advanced" Advocacy
breakout sessions
·
NSBA
will host a Hill Day Wrap-Up Reception
Click here to register for the Advocacy
Institute. The hotel block will close on Monday, January 15.
Registration is now open for the 2018 PASA Education Congress! State College, PA, March 19-20, 2018
Don't miss this marquee event for Pennsylvania school leaders at the Nittany Lion Inn, State College, PA, March 19-20, 2018.
Learn more by visiting http://www.pasa-net.org/2018edcongress
SAVE THE DATE for the 2018
PA Educational Leadership Summit - July 29-31 - State College, PA sponsored by
the PA Principals Association, PASA, PAMLE and PASCD.
This year's Summit will be held from July 29-31, 2018 at the Penn Stater
Conference Center Hotel, State College, PA.
Any comments contained herein are my comments, alone, and
do not necessarily reflect the opinions of any other person or organization
that I may be affiliated with.