Daily postings from the Keystone State Education Coalition now
reach more than 3785 Pennsylvania education policymakers – school directors,
administrators, legislators, legislative and congressional staffers, Governor's
staff, current/former PA Secretaries of Education, Wolf education transition
team members, Superintendents, PTO/PTA officers, parent advocates, teacher
leaders, business leaders, faith-based organizations, labor organizations,
education professors, members of the press and a broad array of P-16 regulatory
agencies, professional associations and education advocacy organizations via
emails, website, Facebook, Twitter and LinkedIn
These daily emails are archived and searchable at http://keystonestateeducationcoalition.org
Follow us on Twitter at @lfeinberg
Keystone State Education Coalition
PA Ed Policy Roundup October 31, 2015:
School Funding Lawsuit: Why Tuesday’s PA Supreme Court
Election Is Absolutely Crucial
The General Assembly shall provide for the
maintenance and support of a thorough and efficient system of public education
to serve the needs of the Commonwealth.
– Article III, Section 14, of the Pennsylvania
Constitution
Job
Announcement – Publisher, The Philadelphia
Public School Notebook
Application deadline is now November
7th
Founded in 1994, The Philadelphia
Public School Notebook is an
independent, nonprofit news organization serving thousands of readers who
strive for quality and equality in Philadelphia ’s
public education system. A pioneering resource and voice for the parents,
students, teachers, and other members of the community, the Notebook is Philadelphia ’s go-to
source for news, information, and conversation about its public schools. With
six annual print editions and a website updated daily with news and commentary,
the Notebook is among the few resources of its kind in the U.S.
"A year ago, an education funding lawsuit was filed by the Public Interest
Law Center
of Philadelphia
on behalf of an array of plaintiffs. The suit asked for a court-order forcing
the General Assembly to ensure access to high quality education. But in April, a unanimous Commonwealth Court panel dismissed the suit, saying, in essence, this isn't the
court's problem to fix. The plaintiffs appealed, and now the suit is before the
Supreme Court.
The Supreme Court Justices
elected next week could well determine the fate of that lawsuit."
6 Reasons Why Tuesday’s Pennsylvania Supreme Court Election Is
Absolutely Crucial
The stakes? School funding. Gun control.
Redistricting. And so much more.
PhillyMag Citified BY PATRICK KERKSTRA | OCTOBER
30, 2015 AT 1:23 PM
Read more at http://www.phillymag.com/citified/2015/10/30/pennsylvania-supreme-court-election/#spjcPxlrWeOjDpF4.99
Education Voters Action Fund of PA Supreme
Court Endorsements
Education Voters
Action Fund of PA October 30, 2015
On Tuesday,
November 3rd it is incredibly important that you vote –and your
vote will matter. On November 3rd, PA voters will choose 3 new
Supreme Court Justices. These justices will be seated when the school funding
lawsuit goes before the Supreme Court in 2016 and, as you know, this
lawsuit could play a pivotal role in providing sufficient and equitable funding
to Pennsylvania
students. In addition, the judges elected will all likely play an important
role in redistricting and any questions of voter access (i.e. voter ID cases
and the like).
Education Voters
Action Fund is endorsing Christine
Donohue, Kevin M. Dougherty and,David N. Wecht.
All three candidates are qualified and recommended by the PA Bar Association.
"Members of the
coalition include the school districts of Lancaster ,
William Penn, Panther Valley , Greater Johnstown
Area and Shenandoah Valley, the Pennsylvania
Association of Rural and Small
Schools and the state
conference of the NAACP."
Battle over fairness of
state education funding heads to Supreme Court
Penn Live By Matt Miller |
mmiller@pennlive.com Email the author | Follow on Twitter on
May 20, 2015 at 2:55 PM, updated May 20, 2015 at 2:56 PM
A coalition of
parents, school districts and public interest groups filed an appeal Wednesday
with Pennsylvania 's
Supreme Court challenging the Commonwealth
Court 's dismissal of its lawsuit over state
education funding. Commonwealth
Court dismissed the suit against the state Education Department last
month after concluding that funding for public education is a matter for the
Legislature, not the courts. The
coalition is seeking a revamp of Pennsylvania 's
education funding system, claiming the Legislature is violating the state
constitution by financing public schools through an inequitable formula. The
current system creates an imbalance of financing between poor and wealthy
districts and jeopardizes the civil rights of disadvantaged students, the
alliance contends.
School funding lawsuit
headed to the Pa.
Supreme Court
BY SOLOMON LEACH,
Daily News Staff Writer leachs@phillynews.com, 215-854-5903
POSTED: May 22, 2015
A LAWSUIT ACCUSING
the state of failing to adequately and equitably fund education is headed to
the state Supreme Court. The plaintiffs,
which include six school districts and two statewide organizations, filed an
appeal yesterday challenging a Commonwealth Court decision last month to
dismiss the suit, claiming that school funding is a function of the
Legislature, and therefore not a matter for the courts. "Our Supreme Court bears the
responsibility for ensuring that our most precious constitutional rights are
protected. We hope that the high court will agree that this responsibility
includes public education, the most important issue facing our
commonwealth," Jennifer Clarke, executive director of the Public Interest
Law Center of Philadelphia, one of the groups representing the districts, said
in a statement.
http://articles.philly.com/2015-05-22/news/62465345_1_school-funding-lawsuit-small-schools-districts
The General Assembly shall provide for the
maintenance and support of a thorough and efficient system of public education
to serve the needs of the Commonwealth.
– Article III, Section 14, of the Pennsylvania
Constitution
Parents, School Districts
Ask PA Supreme Court to Hear School Funding Lawsuit, 9/18/15
Thorough and
Efficient website SEPTEMBER
21, 2015 BGRIMALDI
Maura McInerney,
Education Law Center-PA, 215-346-6906, 610-331-8125, mmcinerney@elc-pa.org; Jennifer Clarke, Public Interest Law
Center, 215-870-3797, jclarke@pilcop.org
Harrisburg, Pa. – In
a brief filed Friday, public school parents, school districts, and two
statewide associations continued their legal challenge of Pennsylvania’s broken
school funding system, telling the Pennsylvania Supreme Court that the
availability of a high-quality public education in Pennsylvania will continue
to be a “function of community wealth rather than a constitutional guarantee”
unless the Court agrees to hear the legal challenge. The petitioners are asking the court to send
the case to a full trial and allow them to present evidence that the state
legislature has failed to adequately and equitably fund the state’s public
schools, thereby violating the legislature’s constitutional requirement to
provide a “thorough and efficient system of public education” and to prohibit
discrimination in state programs and services.
Fighting for
Fair School Funding
William Penn SD et. al. v. Pa. Dept. of Education et. al. (Pa. , 2015)
On Sept. 20,
2015, public school parents, school districts, and two statewide
associations continued their legal challenge of Pennsylvania’s broken school
funding system, telling the Pennsylvania Supreme Court that the availability of
a high-quality public education in Pennsylvania will continue to be a “function
of community wealth rather than a constitutional guarantee” unless the Court
agrees to hear the legal challenge.
Read more at ELC and
PILC’s website about the case, available here.
"The General Assembly
has decided what content children need to learn to obtain a quality education,
and they know how much it costs for children to acquire that knowledge. But,
state officials have failed to ensure that students in all districts have
adequate resources to meet these proficiency standards, such as the Keystone
graduation exams."
School Funding Lawsuit
Public Interest Law
Center of Philadelphia website
On November 10,
2014, we filed a lawsuit in Commonwealth Court on behalf of six school
districts, seven parents, the Pennsylvania Association of Rural and Small
Schools (PARSS) and the NAACP Pennsylvania State Conference against legislative
leaders, state education officials, and the Governor for failing to uphold the
General Assembly’s constitutional obligation to provide a system of public
education that gives all children in Pennsylvania the resources they need to
meet state-imposed academic standards and thrive in today’s world. We are
conducting this litigation in partnership with the Education Law Center of
Pennsylvania and pro bono counsel from O’Melveny & Myers LLP.
- See more at: http://www.pilcop.org/school-funding-lawsuit/#more-9475
"Some see Wilkinsburg ’s plight as evidence of a broken school
funding system that shortchanges children from poor families, while others
see it as an argument for investing in charter schools instead of trying to
turn around dysfunctional school systems.
But there is widespread agreement on one thing: The story unfolding here
shows the distance that remains between the ideal of public education as a
great equalizer and the reality that many of the nation’s children are still
consigned to schools that limit their futures."
In a disadvantaged district, a parable of contemporary
American schooling
WILKINSBURG,
Pa. — The high school in this tiny,
impoverished Pittsburgh suburb has long been
among the worst in Pennsylvania .
Now the school board has decided to close it, along with the town’s only middle
school. Board members say that giving up
on the schools is the best thing they can do to give their students a shot at a
better education and a better life. But two neighboring school districts
declined to take the students on before a third, Pittsburgh Public Schools,
found room at one of the city’s lowest-performing high schools, located in one
of its poorest neighborhoods. So in a
deal approved this week, Wilkinsburg students
are headed for a school that is much like the one they are leaving behind. Both have a history of chaotic classrooms and
academic failure. Students at both schools are overwhelmingly African American,
and many suffer from the twin traumas of living in poverty and in violent
neighborhoods. Both schools have seen enrollment dwindle as families with
wherewithal have fled.
"Nowhere is that gap
wider than in Pennsylvania ,
according to federal data. School districts with the highest poverty rates here receive
one-third fewer state and local tax dollars, per pupil, than the most
affluent districts. This spring, the new governor has outlined an ambitious
plan to address the inequities, but it faces opposition at the statehouse. At
the same time, a lawsuit over inadequate school funding is making its way
through the courts, and Education Secretary Arne Duncan has called for change."
The brief political life of Supreme Court candidates
WITF Written
by Mary
Wilson, Capitol Bureau Chief | Oct 29, 2015 4:25 PM
Every time Pennsylvania voters are
asked to make their picks in a race for the Supreme Court, they have to indulge
in a polite fiction -- one that party leaders and candidates both seem to
dislike. The candidates for justice have
a party next to their names, but they must disavow party politics if they make
it to the bench. Voters just have to pretend there's no contradiction. At a recent forum,
three candidates for Supreme Court described how they navigate that process. "Justice serves
all, and it's not along party lines," said Commonwealth Court Judge Anne
Covey, a Republican. "I don't ever
approach a case a Democrat," said Superior Court, Judge David Wecht, a
Democrat. "I don't believe there is a Democratic approach to a case." "The minute
that you're sworn in as a judge, your partisan politics are gone," said
another Democrat, Superior Court Judge Christine Donohue.
PA League of Women Voters 2015 General Election Voters
Guide for Statewide Judicial Candidates
September 24, 2015
LEAGUE OF WOMEN
VOTERS OF PENNSYLVANIA
– CITIZEN EDUCATION FUND
NONPARTISAN VOTERS GUIDE
NONPARTISAN VOTERS GUIDE
In the Balance : PA Supreme Court 2015
PublicSource 2015 ongoing coverage
PublicSource will be covering this historic Pennsylvania Supreme
Court race for three open seats on the seven-member court. We’ll be tracking
campaign contributions and television ads, explaining who is trying to tip the
balance of the court and how the candidates are spending their money. If you normally don’t follow politics or
don’t have a law degree, that’s OK. We want you to be armed with more knowledge
to cast an informed vote on Election Day.
PA Supreme Court 2015: Newspaper endorsement roundup
By Eric Holmberg | PublicSource | Oct. 29, 2015
Part of the project: In the balance: PA Supreme Court
2015
Voters can be
influenced by a variety of endorsements from business, labor and environmental groups.
Other groups, such as the League of Women Voters, ask the candidates questions and
release nonpartisan voters’ guides. PublicSource’s nonpartisan
voters’ guide will be released on Monday, Nov. 2. And then there are newspaper editorial
boards, which often meet with candidates and make influential endorsements.
Three of the seven
seats on the Pennsylvania Supreme Court will be up for grabs on Nov. 3, and the
remaining members are evenly split 2-2 along party lines.
The three Democrats
are Superior Court Judge Christine Donohue, Philadelphia County Court of Common
Pleas Judge Kevin Dougherty and Superior Court Judge David Wecht.
The three
Republicans are Commonwealth Court Judge Anne Covey, Adams County Court of
Common Pleas Judge Michael George and Superior Court Judge Judith Olson.
The lone independent
candidate is Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas Judge Paul Panepinto.
Mystery donor group fuels attack ads in PA Supreme
Court race
Many familiar
organizations gave to Pennsylvanians for Judicial Reform so it could run attack
ads against the three Republican candidates for Pennsylvania Supreme Court. In the past month, the group raised more than
$2.2 million from affinity groups representing Philadelphia trial lawyers, teachers’ unions,
labor unions and others. Pennsylvanians
for Judicial Reform is an independent expenditure group, meaning they can buy
political ads but they cannot coordinate with the candidates or advocate for
the election or defeat of a specific candidate. But there’s an
unfamiliar group called PA Alliance that contributed $500,000 to fund the
attack ads through Pennsylvanians for Judicial Reform since Sept. 11, making it
the second largest contributor behind the Philadelphia
trial lawyers. It gave more than the big
labor unions — Service Employees International Union ($488,000) and American
Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees ($400,000) — and more than
the state and national teachers’ unions. With three of the
seven seats on the state’s highest court up for grabs and the remaining members
split 2-2 along party lines, control of the court will be decided next week. “It's dreadful the
amount of money going into our elections,” said Terry Madonna, pollster at Franklin & Marshall
College . “Money's a
corrupting influence and it's got to be regulated some way, somehow.”
SCHOOL CHOICE: THE ROLE OF THE
CONSTITUTION AND THE COURTS IN IMPROVING EDUCATION
Free for
Members • $7 teachers & students • $10 public
Become a Member today for free admission to this program and more!
Click here to join and learn more or call 215-409-6767.
Become a Member today for free admission to this program and more!
Click here to join and learn more or call 215-409-6767.
Does the
Constitution guarantee an “equal education” to every child? What do the U.S.
and Pennsylvania Constitutions say about school choice, teacher tenure,
standardized testing, and more? The Constitution Center hosts two conversations
exploring these questions.
In the
first discussion, education policy experts—Donna Cooper of Public Citizens for Children and Youth, Mark Gleason of the Philadelphia School
Partnership, Deborah Gordon Klehr of the Education Law
Center, and Ina Lipman of the Children's
Scholarship Fund Philadelphia—examine the state of Philadelphia public
education, what an "equal education" in Philadelphia would look like,
and their specific proposals for getting there. They also explain what, if
anything, the Pennsylvania state constitution says about these questions, and
how state government interacts with local government in setting education
policy.
In the
second discussion, James Finberg of Altshuler Berzon
and Joshua Lipshutz of Gibson Dunn—two
attorneys involved in Vergara v. California, a landmark dispute
over the legality of teacher retention policies—present the best arguments on
both sides and discuss what's next in the case. They also explain what the U.S.
Constitution and major Supreme Court cases like Brown v. Board of
Education, San Antonio Independent School District v. Rodriguez and Parents
Involved in Community Schools v. Seattle School District No. 1 say
about education and our national debates.
WESA Public Forum:
Equitable Education Funding Nov. 9, 7 pm
Pittsburgh
WESA By EBAISLEY • October
27, 2015
Governor Tom Wolfe
has proposed spending 6.1 billion dollars on basic education, yet Pennsylvania is one of
just three states that does not use a formula to distribute funding to local
school districts. What is the best and most equitable way to allocate state
education funding? How can educators and lawmakers ensure a fair education for
all students?
90.5 WESA will convene a "Life of
Learning" community forum November 9 at the Community Broadcast
Center on the south side.
to discuss the Basic Education Funding Commission’s proposed funding
formula as well as strategies used in the state’s history. Doors open at
6:30; forum starts at 7. It
will be recorded for later broadcast. The event is free, but space is limited;
registration is recommended.Register
online to attend.
Panelists include State Senator Jay Costa, member of the Basic Education Funding
Commission; Ron Cowell, President of the Education Policy and Leadership
Center; Linda Croushore, Executive Director of the Consortium for Public
Education; and Eric Montarti, Senior Policy Analyst for the Allegheny
Institute for Public Policy; and Linda Lane, superintendent of Pittsburgh Public
Schools. 90.5 WESA’s Larkin Page-Jacobs will moderate.
WHAT: Community Forum on Equitable Education
Funding
WHEN: November 9, 2015, 7 PM
WHERE:Community Broadcast Center ,
67 Bedford Square , Pittsburgh PA 15203
COST: Free. Register to attend.
WHEN: November 9, 2015, 7 PM
WHERE:
COST: Free. Register to attend.
Register now for the
2015 PASCD 65th Annual Conference, Leading and Achieving in an Interconnected World, to be
held November 15-17, 2015 at Pittsburgh Monroeville Convention
Center.
The Conference
will Feature Keynote Speakers: Meenoo Rami – Teacher and Author
“Thrive: 5 Ways to (Re)Invigorate Your Teaching,” Mr. Pedro Rivera,
Pennsylvania Secretary of Education, Heidi Hayes-Jacobs – Founder and President
of Curriculum Design, Inc. and David Griffith – ASCD Senior Director of Public
Policy. This annual conference features small group sessions focused on:
Curriculum and Supervision, Personalized and Individualized Learning,
Innovation, and Blended and Online Learning. The PASCD Conference is
a great opportunity to stay connected to the latest approaches for innovative
change in your school or district. Join us forPASCD 2015!
Online registration is available by visiting www.pascd.org <http://www.pascd.org/>
NSBA Advocacy
Institute 2016; January 24 - 26 in Washington ,
D.C.
Housing and meeting registration is open for Advocacy Institute 2016. The theme, “Election Year Politics & Public Schools,” celebrates the exciting year ahead for school board advocacy. Strong legislative programming will be paramount at this year’s conference in January. Visit www.nsba.org/advocacyinstitute for more information.
Housing and meeting registration is open for Advocacy Institute 2016. The theme, “Election Year Politics & Public Schools,” celebrates the exciting year ahead for school board advocacy. Strong legislative programming will be paramount at this year’s conference in January. Visit www.nsba.org/advocacyinstitute for more information.
PASBO 61st Annual
Conference and Exhibits March 8 - 11, 2016
Hershey Lodge and Convention Center, Hershey, Pennsylvania
Hershey Lodge and Convention Center, Hershey, Pennsylvania
Interested in letting our elected
leadership know your thoughts on education funding, a severance tax, property
taxes and the budget?
Governor Tom Wolf,
(717) 787-2500
Speaker of the
House Rep. Mike Turzai, (717) 772-9943
House Majority Leader Rep. Dave Reed, (717) 705-7173
Senate President Pro Tempore Sen. Joe Scarnati, (717) 787-7084
Senate Majority Leader Sen. Jake Corman, (717) 787-1377
House Majority Leader Rep. Dave Reed, (717) 705-7173
Senate President Pro Tempore Sen. Joe Scarnati, (717) 787-7084
Senate Majority Leader Sen. Jake Corman, (717) 787-1377