Daily postings from the Keystone State Education Coalition now
reach more than 4050 Pennsylvania education policymakers – school directors,
administrators, legislators, legislative and congressional staffers, Governor's
staff, current/former PA Secretaries of Education, Wolf education transition
team members, superintendents, school solicitors, principals, PTO/PTA officers,
parent advocates, teacher leaders, business leaders, faith-based organizations,
labor organizations, education professors, members of the press and a broad
array of P-16 regulatory agencies, professional associations and education
advocacy organizations via emails, website, Facebook, Twitter, Instagram and
LinkedIn
These daily emails are archived and searchable at http://keystonestateeducationcoalition.org
Follow us on Twitter at @lfeinberg
Keystone
State Education Coalition
PA
Ed Policy Roundup Feb 27, 2017:
Continued
responses to Sen. Eichelberger’s comments on inner city kids
"Inner city schools," however,
have not failed the children of this Commonwealth. The Legislature has. It is the Legislature that has the
constitutional duty to support and maintain a thorough and efficient system of
public education, yet refuses to ensure that all public schools have enough
resources to educate our children. It is
the Legislature that argued to Pennsylvania courts that no individual child in
the Commonwealth has a right to a sound education, and that the only
responsibility the state has is to simply unlock school doors and turn on the
lights. It is the Legislature that has
perpetuated a system where 418 of the Commonwealth's 500 school districts have
inadequate funding.”
Eichelberger's remarks on schools revealed
a deeper truth - they're still underfunded: Dan Urevick-Ackelsberg
PennLive
Op-Ed By Dan
Urevick-Ackelsberg on February 24, 2017 at 8:15 AM, updated February 24,
2017 at 8:23 AM
The fastest way to find an
underfunded school in Pennsylvania is a simple one: look for the presence of
black and brown children. That
uncomfortable reality is worth remembering amid the furor over recent comments
made by Sen. John Eichelberger, R-Blair, chairman of the Senate Education
Committee. According to published
reports, Eichelberger recently suggested that students of color should be
steered toward less intensive academic tracks, implying that those children are
less capable of advanced academic success, higher education, and the career
paths that follow from it. The
stereotypes underlying Eichelberger's comments are as demeaning as they are
worn. They are whispered in
conversations between friends, given as justifications by state senators, and
even were uttered from the bench by the late Justice Antonin Scalia, who
suggested that similar stereotypes were reason to find even the mildest
affirmative action policies unconstitutional.
“If nothing else, this episode has been
a “teachable moment” for Mr. Eichelberger, bringing him up to speed on
issues central to the committee he chairs.”
Seeking personal best: Sen. Eichelberger’s stumble is a teachable
momentPost Gazette Editorial By the Editorial Board February 26, 2017 12:00 AM
With just a couple of sentences,
a Blair County lawmaker last week managed to impugn inner-city students, the
public schools that teach them and the value of career and technical education
programs. State Sen. John Eichelberger, a Republican, should know better. He
chairs the Education Committee. “They’re
pushing them toward college, and they’re dropping out,” Mr. Eichelberger said
in remarks initially reported by the Carlisle Sentinel. “They fall back
and don’t succeed, whereas if there was a less intensive track, they would.” By
less intensive, he meant career and technical education. He later said his remarks were taken out of
context and insisted that he was blaming the schools that failed to educate
inner-city children, not the students themselves. He also said he believes all
children should pursue whatever ambitions they have. It’s good to hear the
senator expand on his comments, for the issue he raises is crucial to secondary
education and the future of the American workforce.
Senator looks to oust Eichelberger as
chairman
Philadelphia’s Hughes outraged by Blair senator’s take on ‘inner
city’ programs
Altoona Mirror by RUSS O'REILLY Staff
Writer roreilly@altoonamirror.com FEB 23, 2017
An effort may be brewing in Harrisburg
to remove Sen. John H. Eichelberger Jr., R-Blair, from his new position as
education committee chairman because of comments he made during a town hall
meeting Sen. Vincent Hughes,
D-Philadelphia, said Eichel-berger displayed ignorance and bias with regard to
inner-city education. At the town hall
meeting in Carlisle, the Carlisle Sentinel quoted Eichelberger for a Feb. 16
story. “He (Eichelberger) moved into
a critique of Pennsylvania’s ‘inner city’ education programs, positing that
money was being misspent on pushing minority students from high school into
college instead of into vocational programs,” the Sentinel reported. The story included a direct quote from
Eichelberger: “They’re pushing them toward college and they’re dropping
out. They fall back and don’t succeed, whereas if there was a less intensive
track, they would.” Hughes was
outraged by Eichelberger’s comments, and he told the Mirror on Wednesday that
he believes there is enough support to successfully remove Eichelberger as
education committee chairman. “We are
looking internally at what our actions are. What’s clear to me is there are
several areas of education policy that he is deficient in — especially around
equity of funding, which, all things considered, in education policy is the
most important thing that the committee has to address,”Hughes said. Eichelberger said the news story
took his comments out of context.
http://www.altoonamirror.com/news/local-news/2017/02/senator-looks-to-oust-eichelberger-as-chairman/
Kenney and other Democrats are outraged at Republican Sen. John
Eichelberger’s claim that some city students need “less intensive” programs.
Philly Magazine BY CLAIRE SASKO | FEBRUARY
24, 2017 AT 9:18 AMLast week, Pennsylvania senator and Education Committee chair John Eichelberger reportedly claimed that students in some “inner city” neighborhoods need “less intensive” programs. This week, Mayor Jim Kenney called that comment “racism,” according to the Inquirer. “That is the basic problem in school funding in Pennsylvania: We go to Harrisburg, hat in hand, to beg for money from those men —those white men — who think our kids can’t succeed,” Kenney said at a City Hall roundtable on early literacy, according to the newspaper. Last week, the Carlisle Sentinel reported that Eichelberger, a Republican from Blair County, claimed during a town hall in Carlisle that state funding was being “misspent” on students in public schools in cities like Philadelphia, where instructors are “pushing [students] toward college, and they’re dropping out. They fall back and don’t succeed, whereas if there was a less intensive track, they would.” Eichelberger said such students should be encouraged to pursue vocational programs, according to the Carlisle Sentinel.
Read more at http://www.phillymag.com/news/2017/02/24/kenney-eichelberger-inner-city-racism/#35ZoAxgdqHBGGqwf.99
Top lawmaker: Pushing 'inner city' kids to
college is a waste
Philly Daily News
Attytood by Will Bunch ,
Daily News Columnist @will_bunch bunchw@phillynews.com Updated: FEBRUARY 26, 2017 — 7:56 AM
EST
Suddenly in the winter of
2017, politician town halls are a thing. The simmering anger from
the divisive 2016 election now has hundreds of people crowding meeting rooms
for the handful of Congress members and other elected officials brave enough to
face the public -- and raging against those like Pa. Sen. Pat Toomey who
prefer to conduct that kind of business by phone. And here's the thing:
When elected officials do interact with the actual public, they tend to say the
darnedest things. Take Pennsylvania
state Sen. John Eichelberger, from Blair County in the mostly rural central
part of the Keystone State. Please. It's a pretty safe bet that most people in
Philadelphia have never heard of Sen. Eichelberger. But he's a pretty powerful
guy these days. As Senate Republicans have established a super-majority that
now gives conservative lawmakers remarkable sway over what comes out of
Harrisburg, the three-term senator rose this year to the influential position
of chairman of the Senate Education Committee.
That means Eichelberger instantly becomes a player in the long-running
battle to fix Philadelphia's cash-strapped public schools, which have struggled
to balance its budget and to offer its kids essentials like textbooks, school
nurses, or guidance counselors. This comes during a decade when education aid from Harrisburg has plunged and
lawmakers have also promoted a charter-school funding formula that puts public
districts like Philadelphia at a financial disadvantage.
“One of the problems is that
Pennsylvania is one of 12 states that have no limits on donations to PACs or
individual candidates. If you represent a cause and have access to a lot of
cash, whether you’re a PAC or a private citizen, you can fund a candidate who
you believe is “sympathetic” to your situation. It’s buying influence, and
there’s nothing illegal about it.”
Campaign finance reform needs to become a reality in Pennsylvania
Lancaster Online Editorial by The
LNP Editorial Board February 25, 2017
THE ISSUE - According to a report
that first appeared in The Caucus, LNP Media Group’s weekly government watchdog
publication, special interest groups spent about $147 million in Pennsylvania
on the 2016 elections. Campaign finance records indicate some 84,000 separate
expenditures during the last election cycle, with single donations well into
six figures. As The Caucus reported, interest groups represent, among other
matters, public education, medical malpractice claims and automobile insurance.
Yes, $850,000 buys a lot of
gavels. That’s how much an organization called the Committee for a Better
Tomorrow gave to Democrat Kevin Dougherty’s campaign for state Supreme Court.
He won. The question is, what else does
$850,000 buy? In this case, the
committee represents the Philadelphia Trial Lawyers Association, which opposes
rules that tighten restrictions on malpractice cases, including a cap on damage
awards. You see the connection, and a myriad of potential conflicts. As The Caucus reported, state law prohibits
judges from soliciting donations. So other people do it for them. A donor
doesn’t leave a wheelbarrow full of cash in front of a judge’s door. The money
goes to a political action committee and then to the campaign. And we’re not picking on
Dougherty or judges in general. Right or wrong — and we believe wrong — this is
how politics and elections work in Pennsylvania. And it needs to change. Dougherty might have been the top
recipient of PAC money in the last election cycle, with a total of more than
$2.7 million, but he had bipartisan company on the top 10 list: Democratic
Attorney General Josh Shapiro at $1.8 million; Republican Senate President Pro
Tempore Joe Scarnati at $1.49 million; and Republican House Speaker Mike Turzai
at $1.34 million, to name a few.
Fair DistrictsPA forum takes on
Gerrymandering
Chester County Times By Eliza Mohler, Staff
Writer, The Times Feb 23rd, 2017
WEST CHESTER – Political
strategist Karl Rove once said, “He who can control redistricting can control
Congress.” At her presentation Wednesday at Henderson High School, Fair
Districts PA Chair Carol Kuniholm used this quote to illustrate the
consequences and effects of gerrymandering in Pennsylvania and across the
United States. Gerrymandering is the
manipulation of voter district lines to benefit one party or group over
another. While the practice has been happening for centuries, the new
technology behind data mapping makes it even easier to accomplish today. “This is a nonpartisan issue,” Kuniholm said.
“Voters are not parties, they are people. In the traditional way of
gerrymandering, they are left out of the picture.” She then explained different
methods of gerrymandering, reviewed a brief history of gerrymandering in the
sixth and seventh districts in Pennsylvania, and outlined proposed legislation
that is intended to stop the practice in the Commonwealth, which is a large
political swing state. Kuniholm’s talk
was attended by a full house in the Henderson auditorium and was presented by
Fair Districts PA and the League of Women Voters of Chester County. Both groups
strive to change the map drawing process for state and congressional districts
in Pennsylvania.
EDITORIAL: It’s time to fix mess of
redistricting
Pottstown Mercury
Editorial POSTED: 02/24/17, 9:42 AM EST | UPDATED: 1 DAY AGO
To the victor goes the spoils.
It’s an old saying, but never more accurate when it comes to the way
Pennsylvania’s Congressional districts are drawn. Consider, for instance, the 7th
Congressional, which covers a swath of southeastern Pennsylvania. Pat Meehan
has been the 7th District congressman since winning office in 2010. You might
remember that’s also the year Democrat Joe Sestak gave up the seat to challenge
incumbent U.S. Sen. Arlen Specter. Meehan rolled to an easy win, just as he has
in to successive elections since. The
7th District was once considered a toss-up after Sestak ended Curt Weldon’s
20-year reign in Washington. But something changed. That something is called redistricting. Done
every 10 years supposedly to reflect changes noted in the census, it instead
usually reflects partisan politics and those in control making sure things
remain that way. Don’t automatically shovel
the blame on Republicans. Democrats have been guilty of doing the same thing
when they hold the reins of power. The
7th District is now a bizarre amalgam of suburban Philadelphia. It covers the
bulk of Delaware County, but it now zigs and zags to include five different
counties, including small parts of Berks, Chester, Montgomery and even a sliver
of Lancaster counties.
Baer: The gerrymander slayer: Meet PA's
grandma on a mission
Philly Daily News by John Baer, Political Columnist baerj@phillynews.com Updated: FEBRUARY 26, 2017 5:26
PM EST
CAROL KUNIHOLM of Exton, a
61-year old grandmother of three, is on a mission most view impossible: Get
gerrymandering out of Pennsylvania politics.
She's a Mount Vernon, N.Y., native who grew up as "the poorest kid in
a pretty wealthy community" with good schools that she says shaped her
life. She has a Penn PhD in American literature, and worked as a youth pastor
with at-risk kids in Philly's Kensington neighborhood. She and her husband have
three grown children. He works for the American Bible Society in Philly's
historic district. Now she's running
Fair Districts PA, an effort aimed at ending gerrymandering - the practice of
politicians drawing congressional and legislative district lines to protect
themselves by diminishing or extinguishing electoral competition. Pennsylvania is routinely ranked among the
nation's most gerrymandered states. For
more than a year, Kuniholm's been pushing electoral reform hard on social media
and at public meetings. She's talking and working with state lawmakers and
groups affiliated with the effort, including the Committee of Seventy, Common
Cause, the Pennsylvania Council of Churches, and the Commonwealth Foundation.
“The property tax measure under
consideration would divert school costs from property taxes to sales and income
tax increases without changing the distribution of resources –meaning that
poorer taxpayers would support lavish spending in wealthy districts without
seeing more money for their own schools. The tax credit program, called the
Educational Improvement Tax Credit (EITC) is called "vouchers lite"
by opponents.”
Philly community action meeting draws
hundreds
Councilwoman Gym's event sought
to channel protesters' energy into action.
The notebook by Greg Windle February
24, 2017 — 5:51pm
"Behold the face of true
democracy.”
The shout came from one of more
than 500 activists packed into the Arch Street United Methodist Church
during the first break at City Councilwoman Helen Gym’s Thursday night
community action meeting, attended by both veteran activists and those inspired
by the election results to get involved in local politics for the first time. The meeting, called “Beyond the Protests,”
sought to channel the energy of those protesting President Trump into
organizing around specific political causes.
Attendees first entered the church to a crowded room full of tables run
by 20 local organizations representing progressive causes from immigration
reform to racial and economic justice – some newly formed and others
that have been around for years. Participants
came from 20 zip codes, and by the end of the night they had donated more
than $18,000 to the organizations and made more than 1,700 commitments to
volunteer. At the Philadelphia Federation
of Teachers’ table, the union distributed “Know Your Rights” information sheets
for undocumented students and families in both English and Spanish. They also
handed out a sheet on state legislation that the PFT is organizing to oppose:
the elimination of property taxes and increasing the amount of money in
the program that gives tax credits to businesses for donating to organizations
that give students scholarships to private and parochial schools.
Local officials critical of education
funding
Williamsport Sun Gazette by MEGAN
E. BLOOM Reporter mbloom@sungazette.com FEB 26, 2017
School districts in Lycoming
County are in line to receive increases in basic education and special
education funding under Gov. Tom Wolf’s proposed budget for 2017-18, but not
enough to balance the rising costs of retirement, health care and general
expenses that administrators cannot control, local school officials say. “The state is not keeping up with its
obligation, and it is affecting local taxpayers,” said Christina
Bason, Montoursville Area School District superintendent. Montoursville’s proposed state allocation is
$6.99 million in basic education funding, a $332,000 increase from the 2016-17
allocation of $6.66 million, according
to the state Department of Education. Special education funding would see a
$14,000 increase from $1.23 million to $1.25 million in the next school year. Mandated costs Two mandated costs are retirement and
cyberschools which continue to rise. In 2006, Montoursville paid $509,350 in
retirement and in 2016, $3.17 million, according to Bason. For cyberschools, the district paid $70,900
in 2006 and $270,800 last year, she said. If a student leaves the district to
learn online, the district loses some basic education funding while it still
has to pay for that student’s education.
With rising costs, the community has to pick up the slack with real
estate taxes. She said the community pays for 56 percent of the overall cost of
the district’s operations, while the state pays 42 percent and the federal
government contributes the remaining 2 percent.
Letters to the Editor: Don’t give up on
students ‘left behind’
Delco Times
Letter by Barbara Scott, Nether Providence POSTED: 02/24/17, 8:20 PM EST
To the Times: In Senator Toomey’s
op-ed (2/17) about the new Secretary of Education Betsy DeVos, he tells the
story of his childhood experience transferring from public school to a private,
church-related high school. He implies that opportunity saved his education. He
goes on to argue that Betsy DeVos wants to give every child the same sort of
opportunity, and declares: “DeVos refuses to give up on any child.” The flaw in Secretary DeVos’ plan, of course,
is that there will be millions of children left behind in the “failing schools”
when the wealthier students use their tax credits to fund private, church-based
schools. The students left behind – the ones who expected a decent, secular,
public education funded by the taxes all of us pay, the same decent, secular,
public education we have offered for generations past – those students are the
ones Betsy DeVos appears to be perfectly willing to “give up on.” Those
students are the backbone of this country, and giving up on them is giving up
on our future.
No more school taxes? The prospect worries
DV officials
The legislature's proposed new law will unfairly
penalize fiscally prudent districts like DVPike County Courier By Anya Tikka PUBLISHED FEB 23, 2017 AT 1:39 PM
“With the elimination of property taxes comes the total elimination of taxing authority by locally elected school boards and a total undercutting of local control. As a result, locally elected school board members will be rendered useless.”
MILFORD — The state legislature's proposal to eliminate school property taxes across the state is worrying Delaware Valley School District officials. “They’re talking about ending school property taxes, and replacing them with higher income and sales taxes," said Superintendent John Bell. "These are big issues, and there are lots of ramifications.” He said the law will, in the long run, hurt those most vulnerable. And, he said, the district will lose control of its revenue. If the law is passed, the result will be deteriorating school buildings, causing health and safety hazards, and eventually cutbacks of both staff and teachers, said Bell. It will decide how much a school district will get in state aid based on their last known baseline — that is, the 2016-17 budget — which he said will unfairly penalize fiscally prudent districts. DV has not raised property taxes for the last seven years out of ten. “It’s going to come to haunt us, in respect we’re going to have low baseline," Bell said.
“Brewster co-sponsored the bill last
year because taxpayers wanted tax reform, he said. Now, he hopes that it will
start what he said is an important conversation about how to improve school
funding and maintain the stability of the public school system.”
Movement to eliminate school property
taxes pushes for support in Western Pennsylvania
SaturdayPocono Record By Jamie Martines and Brian Rittmeyer, The Valley News-Dispatch Posted Feb 25, 2017 at 7:50 PM
TARENTUM, PA. (TNS) Local
supporters of eliminating school property taxes think spending by districts is
out of control: Schools are overstaffed, class sizes are too small and pensions
are too big. They say the responsibility
to pay for those costs falls on homeowners — an expanding, aging population who
increasingly cannot afford to stay in their homes. "But I want to stress the word
'everybody' — not just the property owners, everybody — has the
responsibility," said Catherine Fike, a resident of Westmoreland County's
Southmoreland School District who is working to raise local support for
legislation to abolish school property taxes.
Complaints about high taxes to fund schools and discussions about how to
address them aren't new. The Property
Tax Independence Act was most recently introduced in both the state House and
Senate in the 2015-16 session. The
legislation proposed eliminating school property taxes on residential and
commercial property and recovering that revenue — about $14 billion per year,
according to the state Independent Fiscal Office — by raising the sales tax and
personal income tax across the state. School districts could continue to
collect property taxes to pay off existing debt under the proposal.
Times Tribune BY SARAH HOFIUS HALL, STAFF WRITER / PUBLISHED: FEBRUARY 24, 2017
A local lawmaker plans to
introduce legislation that could give school districts pension relief.
At his annual legislative
breakfast Friday, Sen. John Blake, D-22, Archbald, told attendees his plan
would save schools $80 million immediately.
While Blake is still finalizing details, he may introduce the plan as
early as next week. The plan includes refinancing state pension debt, moving
the retail portion of the state’s liquor control board to the pension portfolio
and offering new employees a defined contribution 401(k) plan or the current
option, a defined-benefit plan. The changes would shift risk away
from taxpayers and would affect both the Public School Employees’ Retirement
System and the Pennsylvania State Employees’ Retirement System.
Trib Live by JAMIE
MARTINES | Saturday, Feb. 25, 2017, 2:30 p.m.
Pennsylvania's population is
aging and shrinking, a two-decade trend that has resulted in enrollment drops
at all but one of Westmoreland County's 17 school districts. But that doesn't translate into proportionately
lower expenses, experts say. “Just
because you have declining enrollment doesn't mean you can save a couple
million dollars here or there,” said Jonathan Johnson, senior policy analyst at
the Center for Rural Pennsylvania, an agency providing policy research for the
General Assembly. School officials worry because the number of students impacts
how much state funding districts receive. Fewer students could mean less money,
and it's not easy to adjust spending to compensate, officials say. While the state
funding formula includes a provision that assures schools receive no less money
than they did the previous year, even if enrollment declines, it adds nothing
to offset rising expenses.
RTM wrestles with bottom line
Delco
Times By Leslie Krowchenko, Times Correspondent POSTED: 02/26/17, 11:31 PM EST
UPPER PROVIDENCE >> The
message was clear Saturday from those attending the first of four Rose Tree
Media School District budget process taxpayer forums. Make sure the budget decisions made by the
school board have as little impact on students as possible. In a new approach, approximately 65 residents
shared their ideas to help set priorities in developing the 2017-2018 budget.
The procedure was introduced by Dr. Harris Sokoloff of the Penn Project for
Civic Engagement and facilitated by moderators from the organization. “Your comments will serve to advise the
school board on ways to address the budget gap,” he said. “This is not easy
work.”
Cheltenham says goodbye to same old
classrooms, hello to hands-on learning
Inquirer by Kathy
Boccella, Staff Writer @Kathy_Boccella | kboccella@phillynews.com Updated: JANUARY 11, 2017 — 5:07
PM EST
The year that Colin McCarthy
spent at the Philadelphia Navy Yard with high school seniors from some of the
city’s poorest neighborhoods turned out to be far more than just a quirky pit
stop in a mid-career conversion from marketing executive to public
schoolteacher. As McCarthy watched
students ditch the timeworn desk rows and math drills of a traditional high
school to work around a conference table on long-term, community-oriented
projects, such as bringing solar power to their learning space, he grew
convinced he was seeing the future of American education. And he became an
evangelist. “I want to be the Johnny
Appleseed of project-based learning,” said McCarthy, 49, who now is
spearheading an ambitious $350,000 foundation-backed program to bring the
innovative approach to Montgomery County's Cheltenham School District next
fall. He envisions it becoming a showcase for other schools in the region.
Commentary: Philly's underfunded schools,
undervalued teachers
Inquirer Opinion By
George Bezanis Updated: FEBRUARY
27, 2017 — 3:01 AM ESTGeorge Bezanis is a social studies teacher at Central High School. He serves as the Philadelphia Federation of Teachers' representative at Central, and is a leader of the union's Caucus of Working Educators.
This week, a billboard is
scheduled to go up on southbound Interstate 95 before the Center City exit with
the words "Welcome to Philadelphia: Where we don't value our public school
children. 5-plus years without a raise for our teachers." The message will be signed "with
love," and be accompanied by photos of School Reform Commission member
Bill Green, Superintendent William R. Hite, and Mayor Kenney. The thousands of dollars needed for this
project were crowdsourced in just five days with an average donation of under $30
from teachers, parents, and public school advocates throughout the city. What
has driven educators to shame our public officials into action? Why have things
gotten so desperate?
Betsy DeVos is Michigan's worst export:
Sam Inglot
PennLive
Op-Ed By Sam Inglot on
February 26, 2017 at 9:00 AM, updated February 26, 2017 at 9:02 AM
Sam Inglot is deputy communications director at Progress Michigan,
a progressive communications hub and government watchdog group.
Watching Betsy DeVos' face
plastered across every TV and website for weeks on end as she slogged her way
to become Secretary of Education was like reliving a nightmare we've
experienced in Michigan for years. And it's a something that folks in Pennsylvania
should wake up to as well. When a friend
on the East Coast sent me the piece
written by Matthew Brouillette, formerly of the Commonwealth Foundation, the
Betsy DeVos he was describing was not the DeVos I knew. Brouillette said DeVos "has fought to
improve conventional public schools while simultaneously expanding alternative
school options." That came to news
to me, as someone who was born and raised in Michigan and attended public
schools in the Great Lakes State my entire life, I've only known and seen how
DeVos's name is held in contempt when crossed with public education. I then realized I knew little about
Commonwealth Foundation, and after a quick search, it all became clear.
Is anti-Trump wave spurring candidates for
school, council seats?
Inquirer by Maria Panaritis, Staff Writer @panaritism | mpanaritis@phillynews.com Updated: FEBRUARY 26, 2017 — 3:27 PM
EST
Bucks County Democratic Party
Chairman John Cordisco is planning a municipal-election assault on nearly two
dozen GOP-leaning towns in his suburban Philadelphia battleground. And, like other Democratic leaders across the
politically crucial suburbs, he is gunning to capitalize on a wave of anti-Trump activism. He has hired a new staffer to help
candidates collect nominating signatures to appear on ballots for local school
district and municipal races. Turnout at recent petition events has been
high, even in Republican towns, he said.
“We have all hands on deck,” said Cordisco, whose county leans
Democratic in voter registration but whose local offices remain dominated by
Republicans. “I’m truly excited.” Normally,
Democrats stay home for the low-turnout races upon which Republicans, who
control Washington and Harrisburg, have built their electoral power. But local Democratic chiefs say this year is
different: A slew of liberal candidates and volunteers have come forward to say
they will run for school board, council, and supervisor seats. In some
GOP-dominated towns, Democrats already have full slates of candidates, two
weeks before the March 7 deadline to get on the ballot.
Congress.gov 115th Congress (2017-2018)
Sponsor: Rep. King, Steve [R-IA-4] (Introduced 01/23/2017)
Committees: House - Education and the Workforce
Latest Action: 01/23/2017 Referred to the House Committee
on Education and the Workforce.
How Citizens United gave Republicans a
bonanza of seats in U.S. state legislatures
Washington Post By Nour
Abdul-Razzak, Carlo Prato and Stéphane Wolton February 24This week, federal election commissioner and former commission chair Ann Ravel publicly announced her upcoming resignation. She didn’t mince words: “The mission of the FEC is essential to ensure a fair electoral process. Yet since the Supreme Court’s Citizens United decision, our political campaigns have been awash in unlimited, often dark money.” Citizens United is one of the most controversial Supreme Court rulings of recent years. Issued in 2010, it establishes that “outside spending” in elections qualifies as constitutionally protected speech, effectively removing restrictions that date back to 1947. As a result, corporations and unions have the right to spend unlimited (and largely undisclosed) amounts of money advocating in favor of or against specific candidates. Many, including President Barack Obama, have disagreed with the decision. During the past presidential campaign, Donald Trump repeatedly endorsed this view, referring to the super PACs which emerged as a result of Citizens United as a “total phony deal.” Calls for change have also come from others within the Republican Party. Could President Trump lead an effort to reform campaign finance? There’s one challenge: Our recent research shows that Citizens United has earned Republicans a substantial number of state legislative seats. Our research focuses on state legislative elections because we can more easily isolate the effect of Citizens United compared with other factors that influence election outcomes at various levels (such as the popularity of the president). Before 2010, 23 states had bans on corporations and union funding of outside spending. As a result of the court’s ruling, these states had to change their campaign laws. We can then compare the changes before and after Citizens United in these 23 states with the same changes in the 27 states whose laws did not change. The effect of the court’s ruling is then simply the differences between these two before-and-after comparisons.
A new study adds to the body of research showing that online-only
schools don’t serve low-performing students
The Hechinger Report by NICHOLE DOBO February
22, 2017It was the best of times and the worst of times for virtual schools, which allow students to go to school without ever stepping into a school building. Online schools received yet another hearty endorsement last Friday from the new Secretary of Education Betsy DeVos, who doubled down on her opinion that these schools should expand – without any hint that she recognizes there are serious quality-control issues. Meanwhile, an important study published last week in Education Researcher added to the growing pile of research that reveals that online-only schools tend to attract and harm the most vulnerable students. The study from RAND Corporation and New York University found that Ohio students with low test scores who enroll in online-only schools tend to fall even further behind. High-performing students fare better, but they still do worse than they would have done if they had not enrolled in a virtual school, according to the study. The findings for the lowest achieving students are particularly troubling considering the high stakes for children who are already on the edge of failure. And, as it turns out, low-performing students tend to be drawn to cyber charter schools, the study found. “If that’s a population they want to serve, then they need to design a system that is better for [those] students,” said Andrew McEachin, of RAND Corporation, an author of the new report.
For many children, that free lunch at school is the only meal they will eat that day.
Huffington Post By Caroline Bologna02/24/2017 01:17 pm ET | Updated 1 day ago
When Secretary of Education Betsy
DeVos addressed the Conservative Political Action Conference on Thursday, she
began her remarks with a brief introduction.
“I’m Betsy DeVos. You may have heard some of the ‘wonderful’ things the
mainstream media has called me lately,” she said. “I, however, pride myself on
being called a mother, a grandmother, a life partner, and perhaps the first
person to tell Bernie Sanders to his face that there’s no such thing
as a free lunch.” While DeVos’ “free
lunch” statement was a joke meant to make her right-wing audience chuckle and
to highlight the price tag on government programs, her choice of words was very
troubling to many parents, educators and child welfare advocates. Because the fact of the matter is, for
millions of children in the United States ― all of whom she’s pledged to serve
as education secretary ― there is such a thing as a free lunch. And the
important role it plays in their education and well-being is no laughing
matter.
What happened when one school banned
homework — and asked kids to read and play instead
Washington Post Answer
Sheet Blog By Valerie Strauss February
26 at 12:48 PM
Mark
Trifilio, principal of the public pre-K-5th grade Orchard School in Vermont,
sat down with the school’s 40 educators last summer to discuss the
soon-to-start new school year and homework — how much kids were getting and
whether it was helping them learn. Trifilio
had been pondering the issue for some time, he said, concerned that there seemed
to be an uneven homework load for students in different classrooms within the
same grade and that the differences from grade to grade didn’t make sense. He
had looked up research on homework effectiveness and learned that, generally,
homework in elementary school isn’t linked to better academic performance —
except for after-school reading. So at
that meeting with teachers, he proposed an experiment: stopping all homework in
every grade and asking students to read on their own at school — or, if they
were not ready to read on their own, to do it with a parent or guardian. He
said he was surprised when every one of them — classroom teachers as well as
those who work with special-education students and English-language learners —
signed on to the idea. “All 40 voted
yes,” he said, “and not just yes, but a passionate yes. When do you get 40
people to agree on something?”
So they instituted the
policy, as this page on the
school website shows:
No Homework Policy
Orchard School Homework Information
Student’s Daily Home Assignment
1. Read just-right books every night —
(and have your parents read to you too).
2. Get outside and play —
that does not mean more screen time.
3. Eat dinner with your family —
and help out with setting and cleaning up.
4. Get a good night’s sleep.
Orchard School Homework Information
Student’s Daily Home Assignment
1. Read just-right books every night —
(and have your parents read to you too).
2. Get outside and play —
that does not mean more screen time.
3. Eat dinner with your family —
and help out with setting and cleaning up.
4. Get a good night’s sleep.
What’s the result?
Six months into the experiment,
Trifilio says it has been a big success: Students have not fallen back
academically and may be doing better, and now they have “time to be creative
thinkers at home and follow their passions.”
7:00 PM – 8:30 PM EST Strath Haven Middle School 200 South Providence Road Nether Providence Township
By Public Interest Law Center along with Delco Indivisible and Moving the Needle/Indivisible Swarthmore Education Committees
Join attorney Dan Urevick-Ackelsberg for a briefing on:
·
the basics of education funding
·
the PA school funding lawsuit
·
the property tax elimination bill and how it would affect school
funding
This presentation will
be followed by a discussion on how we can mobilize to protect public education
in PA.
Public
Education Funding Briefing; Wed, March 8, 2017 8:30 AM – 10:00 AM at United Way
Bldg in Philly
Public
Interest Law Center email/website February 14, 2017
Amid a contentious
confirmation battle in Washington D.C., public education has been front and
center in national news. But what is happening at home is just as--if not
more--important: Governor Wolf just announced his 2017-2018 budget proposal,
including $100 million in new funding for basic education. State legislators
are pushing a bill that would eliminate local school taxes by increasing income
and sales taxes. And we at the Law Center are waiting on a decision from
the Pennsylvania Supreme Court as to whether or not our school funding lawsuit
can go to trial. How do all of
these things affect Pennsylvania's schools, and the children who rely on
them? Come find out! Join
Jennifer Clarke, Michael Churchill and me for one of two briefings on the nuts
and bolts of how public education funding works in Pennsylvania and how current
proposals and developments could affect students and teachers. (The content of
both briefings will be identical.) The briefings are free and open to the public, but we ask that you please RSVP.
Briefing:
Public Education Funding in Pennsylvania March 15, from 5:30-7:00 p.m.,
On March 15, from 5:30-7:00 p.m.,
join attorneys Michael Churchill, Jennifer Clarke and Dan Urevick-Ackelsberg
for a briefing on public education.
Topics include:
·
the basics of education funding
·
the school funding lawsuit
·
the property tax elimination bill and how it would affect school
funding
1.5 CLE credits available to PA
licensed attorneys.
New
PSBA Winter Town Hall Series coming to your area
Introducing a new and exciting
way to get involved and stay connected in a location near you! Join your PSBA
Town Hall meeting to hear the latest budget and political updates affecting
public education. Enjoy light hors d’oeuvres and networking with fellow
school directors. Locations have been selected to minimize travel time. Spend
less time in the car and more time learning about issues impacting your
schools.
Agenda
6-6:35 p.m.
Association update from PSBA
Executive Director Nathan Mains
6:35 -7:15 p.m. Networking
Reception
7:15-8 p.m.
Governor’s budget address recap
Dates/Locations
Monday, February 27 Middle Bucks Institute of Technology,
Jamison
Tuesday, February 28 PSBA, Mechanicsburg
Wednesday, March 1 Bedford County Technical Center, Everett
Thursday, March 2 West Side CTC, Kingston
Registration:
Ron Cowell at EPLC
always does a great job with these policy forums.
RSVP Today for a Forum In
Your Area! EPLC is Holding Five Education Policy Forums on Governor Wolf’s
2017-2018 State Budget Proposal
Forum #2 – Harrisburg Area (Enola, PA) Tuesday, February 28, 2017 – Capital Area Intermediate Unit
– 55 Miller Street (Susquehanna Room), Enola, PA 17025Forum #3 – Philadelphia Thursday, March 2, 2017 – Penn Center for Educational Leadership, University of Pennsylvania, 3440 Market Street (5th Floor), Philadelphia, PA 19104
Forum #4 – Indiana University of Pennsylvania Tuesday, March 14, 2017 – 1011 South Drive (Stouffer Hall), Indiana, PA 15705
Forum #5 – Lehigh Valley Tuesday, March 28, 2017 – Carbon Lehigh Intermediate Unit #21, 4210 Independence Drive, Schnecksville, PA 18078
Governor Wolf will deliver his
2017-2018 state budget proposal to the General Assembly on February 7. These
policy forums will be early opportunities to get up-to-date
information about what is in the proposed education budget, the budget’s relative
strengths and weaknesses, and key issues.
Each of the forums will take following basic format (please see
below for regional presenter details at each of the three events). Ron
Cowell of EPLC will provide an overview of the Governor’s proposed budget for early
education, K-12 and higher education. A representative of The
Pennsylvania Budget and Policy Center will provide an overview of the state’s
fiscal situation and key issues that will affect this year’s budget discussion.
The overviews will be followed by remarks from a panel representing statewide
and regional perspectives concerning state funding for education and education
related items. These speakers will discuss the impact of the Governor’s
proposals and identify the key issues that will likely be considered
during this year’s budget debate.
Although there is no
registration fee, seating is limited and an RSVP is required.
Offered
in partnership with PASA and the PA Department of Education March 29-30,
2017 at the Radisson Hotel Harrisburg - Camp Hill, PA .
Approved for 40 PIL/Act 48 (Act 45) hours for school administrators.
Register online at http://www.pasa-net.org/ev_calendar_day.asp?date=3/29/2017&eventid=63
PASBO
62nd Annual Conference, March 21-24, David L. Lawrence Convention Center,
Pittsburgh.
Register now
for the 2017 NSBA Annual Conference March 25-27 Denver
Plan to join public education leaders for networking and learning at the 2017 NSBA Annual Conference, March 25-27 in Denver, CO. General registration is now open at https://www.nsba.org/conference/registration. A conference schedule, including pre-conference workshops, is available on the NSBA website.
Plan to join public education leaders for networking and learning at the 2017 NSBA Annual Conference, March 25-27 in Denver, CO. General registration is now open at https://www.nsba.org/conference/registration. A conference schedule, including pre-conference workshops, is available on the NSBA website.
Register
for the 2017 PASA Education
Congress, “Delving Deeper into
the Every Student Succeeds Act.” March 29-30
SAVE THE DATE LWVPA Convention 2017 June
1-4, 2017
Join the
League of Women Voters of PA for our 2017 Biennial Convention at the beautiful
Inn at Pocono Manor!
Save the Date
2017 PA Principals Association State Conference October 14. 15, 16, 2017
Doubletree
Hotel Cranberry Township, PA
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.