Pages

Monday, February 3, 2020

PA Ed Policy Roundup for Feb 3, 2020 Legislators should begin addressing charter funding formula, starting with cyberschools


Started in November 2010, daily postings from the Keystone State Education Coalition now reach more than 4050 Pennsylvania education policymakers – school directors, administrators, legislators, legislative and congressional staffers, Governor's staff, current/former PA Secretaries of Education, Wolf education transition team members, superintendents, school solicitors, principals, charter school leaders, PTO/PTA officers, parent advocates, teacher leaders, business leaders, faith-based organizations, labor organizations, education professors, members of the press and a broad array of P-16 regulatory agencies, professional associations and education advocacy organizations via emails, website, Facebook, Twitter, Instagram and LinkedIn.

These daily emails are archived and searchable at http://keystonestateeducationcoalition.org
Follow us on Twitter at @lfeinberg


PA Ed Policy Roundup for Feb 3, 2020



Register now for Advocacy Day at the Capitol on March 23rd!
Key focus areas are 1) Charter School Funding Reform, 2) BEF and Special Education Funding, and 3) Funding for PlanCon



“Gov. Tom Wolf has previously called for reform of charter schools, particularly cyber charters that have no local oversight. Legislators should follow suit and begin addressing the funding formula, starting with the cyberschools.”
Editorial: Charter school funding: Time for lawmakers to fix flawed system
Impactful reform will start with addressing the funding formula
THE EDITORIAL BOARD Pittsburgh Post-Gazette JAN 31, 2020 6:15 AM
Charter school funding, an oft-visited topic of debate in the Pennsylvania Legislature, is back on the agenda this year, most recently with hearings on a proposal that would vastly restructure the role of cyber charter schools. Lawmakers are well aware of the funding issues with charter schools and need to fix the inequities in the flawed system. A good starting point would be a change in the way cyber charter schools are funded. Charter schools were created by the Legislature in 1997 with a funding formula that essentially calls for the money to follow the student. A district’s per-pupil cost is the tuition paid by the district to the charter school a student attends. There is no cost to the student. Those tuition payments can vary from district to district, ranging from about $7,000 per student to nearly $18,000. Charter schools, though publicly funded, are privately managed. Brick-and-mortar schools have to get a charter from a local school board, but cyberschools are approved by the state and have no oversight from local elected officials.

“We applaud this group for showing leadership on behalf of local school boards and taxpayers, and we urge state lawmakers to heed their call. This debate should not be partisan nor should it hinge on attitudes about school choice. Reform is needed to manage the tax burden and to ensure that children, regardless of choice, are in schools that are held accountable to high standards. We urge lawmakers to learn from these school leaders and enact needed reforms.”
Editorial: Pennsylvania school superintendents taking aim at charter school reform
Delco Times Editorial February 2, 2020
The long-simmering issue of charter school reform in Pennsylvania was brought to the forefront last week, which was National School Choice Week, by a legion of school superintendents banding together in a call for change in charter school laws. More than 30 superintendents from districts in five counties across the greater Philadelphia region stood together at a press conference in Eagleville, Montgomery County, to announce themselves as a new coalition, the Leaders for Educational Accountability and Reform Network. LEARN is comprised of “school leaders who are standing up for public education and fighting for charter school reform,” said Frank Gallagher, superintendent of Souderton Area School District. Superintendents from districts, large and small, with diverse demographics took to the podium with statistics and anecdotes about the damaging effect of current charter school law on local public school finances. Jim Scanlon, superintendent of the West Chester Area School District, said the only reforms to charter school law in Pennsylvania in recent years have “further undermined the local control and reduced our ability to hold schools accountable.”

Equal cost for equal education: Local districts lobby for change in charter school payments
Ellwood City Ledger By Daveen Rae Kurutz @DK_NewsData and @DKreports February 2, 2020 Posted at 5:00 AM
Area school officials are lobbying Pennsylvania legislators to support a proposal from Gov. Tom Wolf that would level the checkbook for traditional public schools when it comes to their charter school payments. When a child attends a charter school, the school district redirects taxpayer dollars to the new school according to a formula based on enrollment and budget numbers. That means the tuition payment can vary wildly from district to district. Location is everything — especially when it comes to charter school payments. When a Rochester Area School District student receiving special education services transfers to a public charter school, the district pays more than $37,000 to the new school. If that child lives down the road in the New Brighton Area School District, the number is about a third lower — that district pays $25,000 for a student to receive the same education. “They’re paying less for that exact same student,” said Jane Bovolino, superintendent at Rochester. “All we’re saying is make it fair.” Bovalino and other Rochester officials are lobbying Pennsylvania legislators to support a proposal from Gov. Tom Wolf that would level the checkbook for traditional public schools when it comes to their charter school payments. Last month, they met with Sen. Elder Vogel Jr., R-47, New Sewickley Township, and have a meeting scheduled with state Rep. Josh Kail, R-15, Beaver, later this month that they hope Rep. Jim Marshall, R-14, Big Beaver, will be able to attend.

Cyber charter schools are awash in money they waste | Opinion
Penn Live By Susan Spicka January 31, 2020
Susan Spicka is executive director, Education Voters of PA
Legislators in Harrisburg may finally take action to address cyber charter school funding and academic performance issues. That should be music to the ears of Pennsylvanians in every corner of the commonwealth. Each year, Pennsylvania school districts spend $500 million in local taxpayer money on student tuition bills for cyber charter schools. In order to pay these bills, school districts must raise property taxes, cut teachers, or eliminate programs for students. Because the tuition school districts pay cyber charter schools far exceeds the cost of educating students at home on a computer, cyber charter schools are awash in excess money that they waste.And the evidence of this waste is in plain sight. Money intended to be spent educating children is instead spent on billboards, TV commercials, internet ads, and expensive mailing pieces advertising cyber charter schools. Public relations firms, lobbyists, and the CEOS and shareholders of private management companies profit from property tax dollars they receive from cyber charter schools. And Nick Trombetta, founder and former CEO of PA Cyber, went to jail for fraud after spending more than $8 million in taxpayer money on a private airplane, vacation homes, and other luxuries. It is past time for Harrisburg to enact funding reforms that will protect taxpayers from the flagrant waste, fraud, and abuse of taxpayer money by cyber charter schools.
It is also past time for Harrisburg to address the abysmal academic performance of these schools. More than 35,000 students attend state-authorized cyber charters and these students deserve schools that will provide them with a quality education.

Charter school tuition is now biggest budget pressure for school districts
POSTED ON JANUARY 31, 2020 IN PSBA NEWS
PSBA announced that the results from the recently completed 2020 State of Education survey show that more than 70% of school districts identified mandatory charter school tuition costs as one of their biggest sources of budget pressure. This marks the first time in the four years of the survey that charter tuition payments, not pension costs, have been the most commonly identified budget pressure for Pennsylvania’s public school districts. Survey results are based on responses from more than 320 school districts. Look for the new report to be released by PSBA in March!

“Lawmakers across the political spectrum, even those seen as strong proponents of school choice in Pennsylvania, have indicated that the charter school funding formula needs to be revamped, but there has been no broad agreement on any one proposal.”
School officials from across Pennsylvania push for state to address special education, charter school funding
State school districts are struggling because of increases in special education and charter school costs, a group of school business professionals and superintendents said at a news conference Friday. The Pennsylvania Association of School Business Officials (PASBO) and the Pennsylvania Association of School Administrators (PASA) released a report Friday on the financial health of the commonwealth’s 500 school districts. State officials begin the budgeting process for the 2020-21 fiscal year next week. Much of that cost burden has been placed on local taxpayers as partial reimbursement for charter school tuitions ended in 2011 and increased state funding has not kept up with growth, the group said. About $0.76 of new property tax dollars raised during a five-year period between the 2012-13 school year and the 2017-18 school year paid only for charter schools and special education costs, according to information from the two organizations. The increase in special education funding is due to increased enrollment and the need for other services. The state’s special education spending increased by $1.2 billion during that five-year period, Diane Richards of the Governor Mifflin School District in Berks County said. Enrollment in cyber and charter schools also has increased. “Ten years ago, school districts paid $800 million in charter school tuition,” said Brian Pawling, director of business affairs at the Souderton Area School District. “We anticipate that school districts will pay more than $2 billion in charter schools costs this year, a 150 percent increase.” While some of the increase is due to enrollment, much of it is due to the charter school tuition formula, Pawling said. The formula has not been changed in 22 years.

To access a copy of the PASBO/PASA School District Budget Report visit https://www.pasbo.org/2020-winterbudget-report.

“We cannot wait any longer for charter school reform that will address skyrocketing costs and serious financial and academic accountability issues in Pennsylvania’s 20-year-old charter school law.”
An unprecedented and powerful statewide movement is building in PA.
Education Voters PA Published by EDVOPA on January 31, 2020
We are seeing an unprecedented and powerful movement to reform Pennsylvania’s charter school law building throughout the commonwealth.
This week, school leaders from 30 school districts in five counties in southeastern Pennsylvania held a press conference in Montgomery County at the same time that superintendents from districts in Huntingdon, Juniata, Fulton, and Mifflin Counties held one in central PA.  
They delivered the same message: We cannot wait any longer for charter school reform that will address skyrocketing costs and serious financial and academic accountability issues in Pennsylvania’s 20-year-old charter school law.
Urban, suburban, and rural school leaders spoke with a united voice because Pennsylvania’s broken charter school law negatively impacts every school district in the commonwealth from tiny Forbes Road in Fulton County (student population 384) to the School District of Philadelphia, which educates more than 200,000 students.  

Hopkinson the latest school to close due to asbestos fears
It is the seventh school this year to temporarily close.
the Notebook February 2 — 10:02 pm, 2020
Francis Hopkinson School in Juniata will be closed Monday and Tuesday due to new concerns that “asbestos-containing materials may have been disturbed above ceiling tiles that were replaced over the summer,” according to a School District press release. As with other temporary school closures that have occurred this school year, staff will report to the Little School House while students will be able to stop by between 7:30 and 9:30 a.m. to pick up grab-and-go breakfasts and lunches. Prior cases of damaged asbestos at the school “that have been identified were communicated with families and addressed,” the statement said. Independent companies will do the testing and the Philadelphia Federation of Teachers (PFT) “will be invited to work with the District on the process and all results will be reviewed with the organization.”

Asbestos forces closure of another Philly school
Inquirer by Kristen A. Graham and Wendy Ruderman, Updated: February 2, 2020- 9:07 PM
Concerns over widespread damaged asbestos have closed another Philadelphia school. Hopkinson Elementary, a crowded Juniata K-8 that educates 850 students, will be closed at least Monday and Tuesday while air testing is completed in the building. It is the seventh school to close in the 2019-20 term. Crews had been working at Hopkinson, on L Street, addressing “imminent hazards” in multiple locations across the school, including the cafeteria. The school remained open, with key locations sealed off and workers completing remediation when children and staff were not in the building. But the situation escalated Friday, when officials of the Philadelphia Federation of Teachers union shared with Hopkinson staff the extent of the damage at the school. During an earlier district walk-through, environmental staff had observed roughly 55 locations of damaged asbestos. Much of it was above ceiling tiles, with visible debris sitting on top of the tile.

Asbestos is a crisis for Philly schools, but also for the city | Editorial
The Inquirer Editorial Board opinion@inquirer.com Updated: February 2, 2020 - 5:00 AM
A growing population, rising home values, and overall growth has led Philadelphia to a state of relative “civic well-being” as Pew’s “State of the City” report recently put it. The city has changed from a place that people want to flee to a place people want to be. But that could change — fast. The city’s homicide rate is enough cause for concern, but an environmental crisis in the schools poses a bigger threat, since schools are key to driving people’s decisions to leave or move to a city. Increased investment and academic improvements have made a difference. But for the past school year, the school district has been coping with a perfect storm of old buildings and years of deficit funding that are erupting into environmental emergencies. A spate of exposed asbestos has led to school closures, as well as fear and panic among teachers, parents, and community members. Last year, a Philadelphia teacher was diagnosed with mesothelioma, a cancer caused by asbestos. The school year has resembled a whack-a-mole of toxic schools, with an asbestos problem discovered, the problem fixed, only to be followed by yet another school with exposed asbestos or worse: a “fixed“ school determined not fixed after all.

“Wolf is expected to continue his five-year push to give more money to public schools amid a lawsuit accusing the state of harboring deep inequities in how it funds the poorest public schools. One of Wolf's focuses could be charter school reimbursements, which the Pennsylvania School Boards Association said are their members' biggest budget pressure and are “based on a skewed and unfair funding equation.” School advocates also say the process disproportionately siphons cash away from the poorest districts. Republican leaders have maintained the status quo despite longstanding complaints.”
What to Watch for in Pennsylvania Governor's Budget Proposal
Gov. Tom Wolf's sixth budget proposal is coming out Tuesday, and the Democrat is expected to seek more money for education and emphasize the urgency of addressing student-loan debt and cleaning up lead and asbestos in schools.
US News BY MARC LEVY, Associated Press Feb. 1, 2020, at 9:53 a.m.
HARRISBURG, Pa. (AP) — Gov. Tom Wolf's sixth budget proposal to the Republican-controlled Legislature will come out Tuesday, and the Democrat is expected to seek more for public schools and emphasize the urgency of addressing student-loan debt and cleaning up lead and asbestos in schools. Many details of the plan, which could exceed $35 billion, remain under wraps, although the governor's office in recent days has rolled out some features. Wolf himself said his spending blueprint for 2020-21 fiscal year that starts July 1 would hold the line on taxes and contain “no surprises.” To a large degree, Wolf is hemmed in by the Legislature's Republican majorities. While Wolf's relationship with top Republican lawmakers has been stable since a protracted budget dispute in 2017, they have generally blocked his most expansive proposals since he took office in 2015. Five things to watch in the governor's plan:

“School officials warn that despite the proposal to help pay for repairs, districts are hamstrung by other increasing costs, principally from pension, special education and charter school bills. “School district mandated costs are increasing and straining school district budgets. State funding is increasing, but it’s not keeping up with the growth, and the state’s share of funding in multiple line items continues to fall,” according to a report released Friday by the Pennsylvania Association of School Business Officials. The school groups said the state needs to take a broad look at how schools are funded, including the fact that much of school funding comes from local taxpayers through property taxes.”
Old battles remain part of Gov. Wolf’s new budget plan
Meadville Tribune By John Finnerty CNHI News Service February 1, 2020
HARRISBURG — Gov. Tom Wolf will unveil his sixth budget on Tuesday, a spending plan that he’s already indicated will include some familiar proposals, including a bid to increase the minimum wage and use a new tax on natural gas drilling to pay for a wide variety of spending proposals. One big change this year is that the governor is proposing to make $1 billion available through the state’s Redevelopment Assistance Capital Program for school districts to pay for repairs to alleviate problems with lead and asbestos. Despite that proposal, school officials are concerned, saying state aid hasn’t kept pace with rising costs in other areas, most notably pensions, special education and charter school bills.
Here's a closer look at the key budget issues:

“The appeal, the parent said, lies in the reputation of a group of “good” schools, which generally educate more white students and fewer low-income students than the rest of the district. Greenfield, for instance, is a National Blue Ribbon award winner, a place where parents aim to raise $125,000 per year to fund enrichment programs, grants for teachers, and other extras. Nearly 60% of its students are white, and just 20% live in poverty, setting it apart from the majority of Philadelphia public schools, which educate mostly poor students of color.”
Why Philly parents lined up at 4 a.m. to get their kids into kindergarten
Inquirer by Kristen A. Graham, Updated: January 31, 2020- 12:03 PM
The first parents got in line well before the sun rose on Jan. 27. By 4:15, four people were waiting to register their children for one of the 90 coveted spots in kindergarten classes at Greenfield Elementary in Center City. By 7 a.m., it was close to 50. Parents were eventually issued numbers based on their position in line and assigned times to come back to complete registration paperwork.  “It was mass panic for no reason,"one parent said. “We’re not promoting free for everyone with public school if this is how we’re going to roll.” Another was incredulous that there is no sibling preference or ability to complete paperwork online, and upset there was no lottery at Greenfield. “You needed a network to get the inside information about the line, and flexibility with work to be able to stand out there, and then to come back later in the day to register,” the parent said. The line was more evidence of the growing demand for spots in some Philadelphia public schools and a significant long-term change in public perception of the Philadelphia School District among middle-class families.  “Ten years ago, 20 years ago, some people wouldn’t even consider sending their kids to Philadelphia public schools,” said one Greenfield parent, who like many, declined to be identified, citing fears of blowback on their family. “This is a revolution in terms of demand and appeal.”

Upper Darby looks at later high school start time
UPPER DARBY — Upper Darby school administrators and school board members will have a lot to sleep on as they start to investigate delaying the start time for high school students. A number of potential scenarios were created by a committee of  administrators and made public for the first time Tuesday night to push back the start time for secondary education students (high school and/or middle school). The district’s scenarios for potential delayed start time implementation come three months after the state published its own study making the case for later start times, with a general consensus being 8:30 a.m. to provide adequate sleep for adolescents who generally go to bed later and get up later than younger students. At present, Upper Darby High School students start their day 7:30 a.m. and middle school students start at 8 a.m. Assistant Superintendent Ed Marshaleck provided the start times and some costs associated with seven options outlining what may work for the district if they and a delayed start:

“While most who spoke had messages for the students, administrators and staff, OJR Superintendent Susan Lloyd directed her comments toward the legislators in the room. “My hope is that you will leave here today with a deeper commitment to public education and that you are compelled to create schools like West Vincent all across Pennsylvania,” Lloyd said.”
West Vincent Elementary celebrates Blue Ribbon School recognition
Pottstown Mercury By Laura Catalano For MediaNews Group January 31, 2020
WEST VINCENT—The last time an Owen J. Roberts School District school was named a National Blue Ribbon School, the year was 2003. So, on Friday, when the district celebrated the 2019-20 recognition of West Vincent Elementary School, the excitement was palpable. Teachers, staff, board members, administrators and public officials all beamed with pride. But perhaps none were more excited than the nearly 600 students who attend the school. Filling the school gym with a sea of blue shirts, they danced, they applauded, and they directed their full attention to the speakers who, one after another, took the podium before the school’s stage. At the end of the program, when Principal Edward Smith showed a video about the school featuring every grade, the entire student body clapped gleefully along to the music. The ceremony itself was not only a tribute to the national award, which is given to less than one-half of one percent of schools each year, Smith said, but it was also a celebration of the joy of teaching and learning fostered at West Vincent.

LET’S RETHINK OUR SCHOOL BOARD
Applications for the school board are due tomorrow. But without pay or accountability to citizens, this WURD host wonders, how can we really expect them to solve what ails the struggling system?
Philadelphia Citizen BY CHARLES D. ELLISON JAN. 30, 2020
If you didn’t know already, applications for nomination to the Philadelphia School Board are now due Friday, January 31. You also probably didn’t know that deadline was extended by over a week—a sign that perhaps word of the nomination process, which happens automatically with a new mayoral term, didn’t really catch. Nor is it easy to find any information about the applications on the Board of Education’s website. Or, maybe you did know, but couldn’t possibly apply. Because how many people in Philly really can deal with the thankless hassle of leading a big city school district with an over $3 billion budget … without pay? Philadelphia and the Commonwealth as a whole seriously need to explore the question: Should school board members be (1) elected and (2) paid? Doing so may help us arrive closer to an answer on some of the beleaguered public school district’s most pressing needs and problems. Understandably, city officials, the mayor and City Council president chief among them, may view the prospect of an elected school board as unruly, unwieldy and yet another political power headache in a city plagued by too many. Keeping the school board appointed keeps it under the full control and supervision of City Hall, versus the unpredictable nature of a new class of competitive politician. But, even as Mayor Kenney argued for “accountability” as his core reasoning for dissolving the state’s imposed School Reform Commission (SRC) in 2017, that didn’t settle the question of whom that board is accountable to.

U.S. and PA Legislators Visit Renaissance Academy
RA invited key legislators and representatives from the US Senate, US House of Representatives, and the PA House of Representatives.
Phoenixville Patch By Holly Mandia, Neighbor Jan 31, 2020 4:23 pm ET
Phoenixville, PA – On Thursday, January 30, 2020, Renaissance Academy (RA) was visited by legislators and representatives from the US Senate, US House of Representatives, and the PA House of Representatives. Earlier this school year, the RA Administration and Board of Trustees invited all State Reps/State Senators, Congressional Representatives and County Commissioners from Montgomery County and Chester County as well as Education Committee Members in all four caucuses to attend a Legislative Breakfast. Regarding the purpose of the event, Dr. Gina Guarino Buli, RA CEO, said, "We wanted to open our doors to the key decision-makers in Harrisburg in an effort to be transparent with our practices and increase the overall educational opportunities for students throughout the Commonwealth."


The Education Reform Movement Has Failed America. We Need Common Sense Solutions That Work.
Time BY DIANE RAVITCH  7:00 AM EST
Ravitch's new book is Slaying Goliath: The Passionate Resistance to Privatization and the fight to Save America's Public Schools. She is a research professor of education at New York University and the author of eleven books.
The education reform movement that started with George W. Bush’s No Child Left Behind law is dead. It died because every strategy it imposed on the nation’s schools has failed. From Bush’s No Child Left Behind to Obama’s Race to the Top to Bill Gates’ Common Core State Standards to Trump’s push for school choice, the reformers have come up empty-handed. The “reformers” relied on the business idea that disruption is a positive good. I call them “disruptors,” not reformers. Reformers have historically called for more funding, better trained teachers, desegregation, smaller class sizes. The disruptors, however, banked on a strategy of testing, competition, and punishment, which turned out to be ineffective and harmful. Congress passed Bush’s No Child Left Behind law in 2001 based on his claim that there had been a “Texas miracle.” Test every child every year in grades 3-8, he said, reward the schools where scores went up, punish those where scores did not, and great things happen: scores rise, graduation rates increase, and the gaps between racial groups get smaller. We now know that it was empty talk: There was no Texas miracle. But every public school in the nation continues to be saddled with an expensive regime of annual standardized testing that is not found in any high-performing nation.

Who Could Be the Next Secretary of Education After the 2020 Election?
Education Week Politics K12 By Andrew Ujifusa on February 2, 2020 9:12 AM
U.S. Secretary of Education Betsy DeVos has shown how politically potent and polarizing ideas like school choice can be when the public attaches them so strongly to a highly visible person. So with the Iowa caucuses upon us, let's permit ourselves to wonder: Who could be the next secretary of education? We asked several lobbyists, analysts, and others for their responses to that question; they talked to us on background in order to speak candidly. Some of the names they suggested have come up in the past. To be clear, though, none of the people we talked to work directly for the Democratic or Republican campaigns. So maybe don't make triumphant or despondent TikTok videos about any of the names we mention just yet. And of course the names below don't constitute any sort of comprehensive list.  One thing we heard consistently: In part due to Democrats' attitude towards and public statements about DeVos, a Democratic president-elect is particularly likely to pick someone who is or has recently been a practitioner and worked in the public education sector. But it's also fair to ponder whether the next secretary (whether he or she works for a Democrat or Republican) will hail from a higher education background, given all the attention on the 2020 campign trail to student debt and the cost of higher education. DeVos herself has recently demonstrated that the secretary often has much more authority over higher education than over K-12.


Five compelling reasons for .@PSBA .@PASA .@PAIU school leaders to come to the Capitol for Advocacy Day on March 23rd:
Charter Reform
Cyber Charter Reform
Basic Ed Funding
Special Ed Funding
PLANCON
Register at http://mypsba.org

School Leaders: Register today for @PSBA @PASA @PAIU Advocacy Day at the Capitol on March 23rd and you could be the lucky winner of my school board salary for the entire year. Register now at http://mypsba.org

Hear relevant content from statewide experts, district practitioners and PSBA government affairs staff at PSBA’s annual membership gathering. PSBA Sectional Advisors and Advocacy Ambassadors are on-site to connect with district leaders in their region and share important information for you to take back to your district.
Locations and dates

Sectional Meetings are 6:00 p.m. -8:00 p.m. (across all locations). Light refreshments will be offered.
Cost: Complimentary for PSBA member entities.
Registration: Registration is now open. To register, please sign into myPSBA and look for Store/Registration on the left.

Allegheny County Legislative Forum on Education March 12
by Allegheny Intermediate Unit Thu, March 12, 2020 7:00 PM – 10:00 PM EDT
Join us on March 12 at 7:00 pm for the Allegheny Intermediate Unit's annual Allegheny County Legislative Forum. The event will feature a discussion with state lawmakers on a variety of issues impacting public schools. We hope you will join us and be part of the conversation about education in Allegheny County.

All school leaders are invited to attend Advocacy Day at the state Capitol in Harrisburg. The Pennsylvania School Boards Association (PSBA), Pennsylvania Association of Intermediate Units (PAIU) and the Pennsylvania Association of School Administrators (PASA) are partnering together to strengthen our advocacy impact. The day will center around meetings with legislators to discuss critical issues affecting public education. Click here for more information or register at http://www.mypsba.org/
School directors can register online now by logging in to myPSBA. If you need assistance logging in and registering contact Alysha Newingham, Member Data System Administrator at alysha.newingham@psba.org

Register now for Network for Public Education Action National Conference in Philadelphia March 28-29, 2020
Registration, hotel information, keynote speakers and panels:

PARSS Annual Conference April 29 – May 1, 2020 in State College
The 2020 PARSS Conference is April 29 through May 1, 2020, at Wyndham Garden Hotel at Mountain View Country Club in State College. Please register as a member or a vendor by accessing the links below.

Any comments contained herein are my comments, alone, and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of any other person or organization that I may be affiliated with.


No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.