Pages

Monday, December 16, 2019

PA Ed Policy Roundup for Dec. 16, 2019: In Pittsburgh, 2020 Dems put the focus on public education


Started in November 2010, daily postings from the Keystone State Education Coalition now reach more than 4050 Pennsylvania education policymakers – school directors, administrators, legislators, legislative and congressional staffers, Governor's staff, current/former PA Secretaries of Education, Wolf education transition team members, superintendents, school solicitors, principals, charter school leaders, PTO/PTA officers, parent advocates, teacher leaders, business leaders, faith-based organizations, labor organizations, education professors, members of the press and a broad array of P-16 regulatory agencies, professional associations and education advocacy organizations via emails, website, Facebook, Twitter, Instagram and LinkedIn.

These daily emails are archived and searchable at http://keystonestateeducationcoalition.org
Follow us on Twitter at @lfeinberg

If any of your colleagues would like to be added to the email list please have them send their name, title and affiliation to KeystoneStateEdCoalition@gmail.com

PA Ed Policy Roundup for Dec. 16, 2019: 



PSBA Members - Register now for PSBA Advocacy Day at the Capitol in Harrisburg Monday March 23, 2020
Register for PSBA Advocacy Day now at http://www.mypsba.org/
School directors can register online now by logging in to myPSBA. If you need assistance logging in and registering contact Alysha Newingham, Member Data System Administrator at alysha.newingham@psba.org



Editorial: Finally, Pa. gets serious about property taxes
Delco Times Editorial December 12, 2019
When it comes to issues that stir passions among Pennsylvanians, we can’t think of anything that tops the question of what to do about school property taxes. For years activists and lawmakers have been pushing a proposal that would eliminate the unpopular levy and instead fund local education through an increase in personal income and sales taxes. For years the legislation has been stymied in Harrisburg. Now Sen. David G. Argall, a Schuylkill County Republican and a longtime proponent of the tax elimination proposal, is trying a different approach. He is the leader of the bipartisan School Property Tax Work Group, which aims to identify a tax-relief proposal with sufficient support to become law. The group recently outlined five proposals for discussion. One would eliminate school property taxes. The others would reduce but not eliminate the school property tax burden in Pennsylvania.
Plan 1 would reduce school property taxes by $8.62 billion by raising the personal income tax from 3.07% to 4.07%; increase the sales tax to 7% from 6% to generate additional cash for homestead exclusions; require school districts to levy a minimum local earned income of 1%; expand the Property Tax and Rent Rebate Program; and expand the senior safety net through the Deferred Property Tax Program.
Plan 2 would reduce school property taxes by $6.44 billion by raising the personal income tax from 3.07% to 4.62%.
Plan 3 would cap the rebate for homestead properties at $2,340 and raise the personal income tax from 3.07% to 4.32%. It is expected more than 2 million homeowners would see their property taxes eliminated.
Plan 4 would cap the rebate for homestead properties at $5,000 and raising the personal income tax from 3.07% to 4.72%. It is expected that more than 3.1 million homeowners would see their property taxes eliminated.
Plan 5 would eliminate school property taxes by increasing the personal income tax from 3.07% to 4.82% and increasing the sales tax to 7% from 6%.
Argall deserves great credit for being willing to lead this effort, knowing full well that even considering ideas other than elimination will anger many of his constituents in a part of the state where opposition to school property taxes is particularly fierce.

Cost Analysis: Cyber Charter Schools and Public School District Cyber Learning Programs
Pennsylvania Association of School Administrators White Paper
By Dr. Brett Gilliland Director of Educational Support Service, I.U. 11 and Dr. Mark DiRocco Executive Director, Pennsylvania Association of School Administrators June 19, 2018
The Pennsylvania Charter School Law is now more than twenty years old and has grown increasingly obsolete in terms of its application to the current practices in charter school delivery services, especially cyber charter schools. The General Assembly has considered changes to the current law in recent years with draft legislation that would comprehensively reform charter school law. The Pennsylvania Association of School Administrators (PASA) authored a white paper in June 2017 to address the systemic flaws within the current law. The following recommendations were offered to improve the Pennsylvania Charter School Law:

How Citizens United Reshaped Elections
The 2010 Supreme Court decision further tilted political influence toward wealthy donors and corporations.
Brennan Center for Justice by Tim Lau PUBLISHED: December 12, 2019
January 21, 2020 will mark a decade since the Supreme Court's ruling in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, a controversial decision that reversed century-old campaign finance restrictions and enabled corporations and other outside groups to spend unlimited funds on elections. While wealthy donors, corporations, and special interest groups have long had an outsized influence in U.S. elections, that sway has dramatically expanded since the Citizens United decision, with negative repercussions for American democracy and the fight against political corruption. What was Citizens United about? A conservative nonprofit group called Citizens United challenged campaign finance rules after the Federal Election Commission (FEC) stopped it from promoting and airing a film criticizing presidential candidate Hillary Clinton too close to the presidential primaries. A 5-4 majority of the Supreme Court sided with Citizens United, ruling that corporations and other outside groups can spend unlimited money on elections.

Letter: CHARTER SCHOOLS SHOULD BE ACCOUNTABLE
Centre Daily Times by Shannon Telenko, State College December 13, 2019
On Nov. 22 I attended a public roundtable on charter school reform at Penn State where Pennsylvania Secretary of Education Pedro A. Rivera was a participant. As a member of the Parent Advisory Committee for Education Voters of PA, I was specifically interested in hearing about charter school funding. At the roundtable, there was a near-unanimous call for charter school reform, particularly related to how charter schools are funded and the lack accountability for student performance. The funding model for charter schools in Pennsylvania is broken. School districts pay brick-and-mortar and cyber charter schools for students with disabilities based on the average amount that a district spends educating those students, not on the actual cost of providing the charter school students with the services they need. Some area school districts spend nearly $30,000 in tuition for each charter/cyber charter student with a disability, even if that student requires, for example, just 30 minutes per week of speech therapy. The cost of services can total thousands of dollars less than the district is paying. In 2014-2015, charter schools reported receiving $100 million more in special education tuition payments than they spent on educating students. They are then able to spend excess special funding on anything, including lavish CEO salaries, shareholder profits and more. According to our constitution, Pennsylvania “shall provide for the maintenance and support of a thorough and efficient system of public education...” As voters we can hold charter schools more accountable for their spending and performance.

Philadelphia Historical Commission sides with Boys’ Latin school over fate of church building
Inquirer by Maddie Hanna, Updated: December 13, 2019
The Philadelphia Historical Commission on Friday declined a request to designate as historic a West Philadelphia church building owned by Boys’ Latin Charter School, after the school said doing so could derail its plans to convert the building into a needed gym for students. The commission voted that the church at 63rd and Callowhill Streets — which once was Our Lady of the Holy Rosary parish — met the standards for preservation. But it chose not to designate it based on the school’s contention that doing so would more than double its $3.5 million price tag for constructing the gym. Boys’ Latin CEO Noah Tennant also said the efforts to preserve the building in such a way didn’t reflect the broader neighborhood and the low-income community the school seeks to serve. It “is really protecting, I believe, white history, white culture ... at the expense of 375 students who will not otherwise have a gymnasium," he said. The charter school’s foundation bought the church from the Archdiocese of Philadelphia in 2015 to house its middle school campus. It currently occupies a former rectory, convent and school on the property. During recess, students fill the parking lot.

Sala Udin: Vote 'no' on Pittsburgh Public Schools budget and tax increase
The administration should explain the dwindling student enrollment and academic failure
Post Gazette Opinion by SALA UDIN DEC 16, 2019 4:45 AM
Sala Udin represents District 3 on the Pittsburgh Public Schools board of directors.
“If you want to plan for a year, plant rice. If you want to plan for 10 years, plant trees. If you want to plan for 100 years, educate the children.”
— Confucius
Our purpose on the board of Pittsburgh Public Schools is to educate the children. My belief is that we are failing badly in educating our students — all students. Even more worrisome, the educational achievement gap between white and black children in Pittsburgh Public Schools is persistent and has not been reversed. The racial achievement gap over the last three years shows a continuous, unacceptable failure in the basic subjects of reading, math and science. Black children, in mostly black schools and in integrated schools, continue to lag far behind white children in these fundamental academic subjects. Millions of dollars have been spent over this time period on “reform” programs that have not altered the achievement deficits. Slogans and aspirational goals do not create real, lasting change. Substituting new, unproven programs for old, failed programs also does not create real change. Instead of proven reforms, the administration has offered yet another new slogan — “Imagine PPS” — apparently to be coupled with the previous ineffective slogan, “Expect Great Things.”

Editorial: New Kensington-Arnold School District Tax increase is harsh lesson
TRIBUNE-REVIEW | Sunday, December 15, 2019 12:01 p.m.
The New Kensington-Arnold School District financial situation is an argument for a change in how government — and taxpayers — should think about taxes. It would be great to fund our schools and other vital public services without requiring everyone to kick money into a collective pot. But failing another revenue stream, or Jeff Bezos and Bill Gates adding a few towns to their Christmas list, taxes are what we have. New Kensington-Arnold property owners are going to get an ugly surprise next fiscal year as the district is looking down the barrel of a staggering tax increase. The struggle isn’t shocking. The economy in the area is not robust and the known challenges for the district just swept in five new board members. But those economic realities demonstrate hard truths. According to Business Manager Jeff McVey, property taxes could spike 7 mills in a proposed budget. The proposed millage increase would add $140 to a homeowner’s tax bill per $20,000 of assessed value. And state law would be bent to its limits to allow such a steep hike. Even with a tax increase of this degree, the fund balance will still be drained dry and the 2020-21 fiscal year will end in a pool of red ink. Ten years ago, the district sat on a fund balance of $7.6 million. So how did this happen? Ten years of spending more than what came in is part of it. The other is not changing what was coming in.

“Changes have also bubbled across the Philadelphia region. In Radnor, high school now starts at 8:30, pushed back from 7:35 last year. Tredyffrin/Easttown also delayed start times this year, pushing high school to 7:50 and middle school to 8:27. Unionville-Chadds Ford was the first area district to switch, pushing high school to 8 a.m. in fall 2017. Lower Merion’s plan would shift all upper grades in line with the medical recommendations, pushing the high school start to 8:25 and middle school to 9:05. But such changes involve a complex web of factors that go into realigning school schedules. Among the biggest challenges is transportation, one exacerbated in Pennsylvania.”
Lower Merion wants elementary school students to start earlier, and high schoolers to arrive later. Some parents aren’t happy
Inquirer by Maddie Hanna, Updated: December 13, 2019
As a child psychologist, Lisa Schwartz supports the science-backed trend of starting the school day later for middle and high school students. She sees it as a “life-and-death" issue. But as a parent of first and fourth graders, Schwartz understands concerns about the steps the Lower Merion School District would take to accommodate the switch. It wants to bump up the start of the elementary school day by 75 minutes, from 9 a.m. to 7:45. In addition to having to wake children earlier, Schwartz thinks parents may have an even harder time finding child care if the school day ends at 2:35 p.m., as Lower Merion is proposing. She is among a chorus of elementary parents raising questions about the Main Line district’s plan to reorder its school start times. Lower Merion has been discussing the potential changes for years, and within weeks administrators are expected to present an update to the school board that will lay the groundwork for a vote early next year. Yet the latest plan is prompting some parents to demand the district come up with another option — including during listening sessions that took place last week. The controversy follows moves by districts around the country to better align student schedules to what research shows is healthiest for young people.

‘We don’t believe in punishment’: Student-led youth court could come to Harrisburg school
WHYY By Sean Sauro, PennLive December 14, 2019
Audrey Dudley presented a scenario: A high school student angry with his teacher lashes out swearing and yelling before standing from his desk, walking to a classroom door and slamming it on his way out into the hallway — slamming it so hard that a glass window in the door shatters. In a traditional school setting, it’s a scene that would end with discipline, possibly detention or out-of-school suspension. But in Norristown, where Dudley teaches social studies, there is another option. It’s an option that soon could be available at a Harrisburg high school, too. For six years, Dudley has led Norristown Area High School’s youth court program, which allows students who break certain rules to admit guilt and appear before a jury of their peers. That jury then assigns corrective action plans that take the place of traditional punishments. In the case of the door-slamming student, that could mean writing letters of apology, seeking out anger management counseling and helping school maintenance staff repair the broken glass, Dudley said. If completed, traditional punishments would be ignored and the offense wouldn’t be added to the student’s permanent record, she said. A school administrator is in charge to ensure that the plan is followed. If it’s not, traditional punishments could come back into play, she said.

APPS: Philly SD Student Achievement and Support Committee Report, December 5, 2019
Alliance for Philadelphia Public Schools by Lynda Rubin December 13, 2019 appsphilly.net 
In response to repeated public requests, the Board Committees have begun posting the Committee agendas, including descriptions of Action Items to be considered, one week before the meeting. However, 7 new items were added to the agenda just hours before this meeting, 6 of which are charter renewals (including 5 Mastery charters). Yet the CSO had sufficient time to prepare an extensive power-point presentation. We also question how parents and students from all 5 Mastery schools were printed on the official speakers list. How did charter supporters sign up 24 hours ahead of time to speak on Action Items that were not publicly posted until 5 hours before the meeting?  Additionally, the power-point slides prepared for the District Reports by staff were not posted until the day after the meeting. Board members continue to say that Committee meetings are where deliberation and dialogue take place, and have used that justification for not responding to questions at Action Meetings.  The Board continues to withhold information about charter matters until after the Board votes. How can people ask informed questions with limited information? 

Who turns down federal money? Legislators in New Hampshire halt a $46 million charter school grant from DeVos’s Education Department.
Washington Post Answer Sheet By  Valerie Strauss  Dec. 13, 2019 at 7:11 p.m. EST
Turning down millions of dollars in federal money is not a usual occurrence, but that is what Democratic members on a key legislative committee in New Hampshire just did. They voted to block the first installment of a $46 million grant that the Education Department recently gave the state to double the number of charter schools over the next five years. Members of the Joint Legislative Fiscal Committee voted 7 to 3 on Friday to table the grant from the federal Charter School Program (CSP), with the majority Democrats saying they were concerned about the effect that the expansion of charter schools could have on traditional public schools at a time of decreasing enrollment. Democrats won control of the state legislature last year, though the governor, Chris Sununu, and the state education commissioner, Frank Edelblut, are both Republican. Edelblut is a businessman and one-term state representative who home-schooled his seven children. Both men supported the grant. Charter schools are financed by the public but privately operated, sometimes by for-profit companies. Charters enroll about 6 percent of America’s schoolchildren; in New Hampshire, there are 29 charter schools that enroll about 3,800 of about 176,000 students. Education Secretary Betsy DeVos is a big backer of charter schools, and she has said her chief priority is to expand them and other alternatives to traditional public schools, which she once called “a dead end.”

In Pittsburgh, 2020 Dems put the focus on public education
Special to the Capital-Star By Kim Lyons December 14, 2019
PITTSBURGH —  U.S. Sen. Elizabeth Warren wants to put $800 billion into Title I schools. U.S. Sen. Bernie Sanders says teachers need to be paid at least $60,000 a year. And South Bend, Ind.,  Mayor Pete Buttigieg wants to create an “Education Access Corps” that would staff Title I schools –those with the highest concentrations of students in poverty — and allow teachers’ student loans to be forgiven.  Seven of the Democrats running for president told an audience of educators and students their plans for public education reform at The Public Education Forum 2020. The day-long forum, held at the David L. Lawrence Convention Center in downtown Pittsburgh, was the first major event of the primary season focused exclusively on public education. The forum was organized by education and community groups including the Schott Foundation for Public Education, an educational advocacy organization that provides grants and other resources toward increasing the quality of public education,  the American Federation of Teachers and the NAACP. MSNBC was the event’s media sponsor.

Democratic presidential candidates largely agree on education issues in Pittsburgh forum
Candidates’ answers differed, however, when it came to how they would make changes
WITF by Sarah Schneider/WESA DECEMBER 15, 2019 | 8:36 AM
 (Pittsburgh) — The seven Democratic presidential candidates who spoke to union members and activists in Downtown Pittsburgh Saturday espoused similar goals: paying teachers more, ensuring more equitable resources for poorer schools, and unraveling an earlier generation of changes that include charter schools and standardized testing. Massachusetts Senator Elizabeth Warren — among the favorites with the crowd of roughly 1,000 educators, activists and students — captured the flavor of much of the day’s commentary in a discussion of school funding. “So long as we keep basing funding mostly on whether or not you live in a neighborhood where they can afford to pay high property taxes or low property taxes, we’re going to keep moving the opportunities for our children further and further apart,” she said. Candidates’ answers differed, however, when it came to how they would make changes, and on who had the most credibility to deliver them.

U.S. must fix education inequality, spend big to do it, say Democratic presidential candidates at Pa. forum
Penn Live By David Wenner | dwenner@pennlive.com Updated Dec 14, 10:09 PM;Posted Dec 14, 4:39 PM
PITTSBURGH — In America, the value of someone’s home dictates the quality of the schools their children attend, and whether their children have a fair chance at success. That was a prevailing criticism among seven Democratic presidential candidates who attended an all-day public education forum in Pittsburgh on Saturday, and portrayed the flaw as being the root of social injustice in the United States. Americans who can afford expensive homes send their kids to better-funded public schools with more to spend on teachers, educational programs and activities, they said. The opposite is true for residents of poor areas, both urban and rural. Moreover, well-off Americans send their kids to pre-school enrichment and educational programs from the earliest age, giving them a permanent advantage over children from less expensive zip codes. “Poor kids are being punished for being poor,” said former Pete Buttigieg, a former mayor of South Bend, Ind.
Buttigieg said such inequality “threatens to pull down the whole country,” and the United States won’t reach its full potential without overcoming it. Buttigieg and the other Democratic frontrunners — Sen. Elizabeth Warren, Vice President Joe Biden and Sen. Bernie Sanders — attended the forum in front of an audience of more than 1,000.

Democratic presidential candidates discuss education issues at Pittsburgh forum
PITTSBURGH POST-GAZETTE  Got a news tip? 412-263-1601 localnews@post-gazette.com DEC 14, 2019 9:20 PM
For a moment on Saturday in Downtown Pittsburgh, it seemed as if the race for the Democratic presidential nomination paused for a moment, replaced by a competition for who could say the nicest thing about teachers. But alas, the two might go hand-in-hand. Participating in the first-ever nationally televised presidential candidate forum focused on public education, seven of the 2020 race’s Democratic contenders grappled with issues important to teachers unions and grassroots organizations — several of which convened the forum and have yet to endorse a candidate in the primary. “If we honored our teachers a little more like soldiers, as well as paid them a little more like doctors, we wouldn’t have this issue of shortages,” South Bend, Ind. Mayor Pete Buttigieg said 40 minutes in.

Public school funding a hot topic for Democratic candidates at Pittsburgh forum
Trib Live by JAMIE MARTINES   | Saturday, December 14, 2019 6:32 p.m.
Pittsburgh served as the backdrop Saturday as seven Democratic presidential candidates met at the David L. Lawrence Convention Center to discuss their education policy platforms. Front-runners Vice President Joe Biden, Sen. Bernie Sanders and Sen. Elizabeth Warren were joined by Sen. Michael Bennet, Mayor Pete Buttigieg, Sen. Amy Klobuchar and Tom Steyer for the daylong, invitation-only event organized by national and local teachers’ union and public school supporters. Sen. Cory Booker was scheduled to attend but dropped out because of the flu, according to a statement from his campaign. Candidates each gave one-on-one interviews with Ali Velshi, host of “MSNBC Live,” and Rehema Ellis, “NBC News” education correspondent. They also fielded questions from the audience, which included more than 1,000 teachers, students, parents and community members from Pittsburgh and across the country.

Seven Democrat Presidential Hopefuls Seek Education Stakeholder Approval; Some More Successful Than Others
Forbes by Peter Greene Senior Contributor Dec 14, 2019, 10:17pm
Saturday an assortment of Democratic Presidential hopefuls went before an audience of education stakeholders to make their education case. The format was brief intro, grilling by moderators, and questions from selected audience members; those questioners included teachers, parents, students, and activists. Here’s how the day went for some of the participants.


Training: Enhancing School Safety Jan. 9th, 8 am – 1 pm Council Rock High School South
The training is provided by the United States Secret Service and the Office PA Rep Wendi Thomas, in partnership with the Bucks County Intermediate Unit, Bucks County DA Matt Weintraub and PSEA.
Date: Thursday, January 9, 2020, 8 a.m. to 1 p.m.
Council Rock High School South, 2002 Rock Way, Holland PA 18954
This is the region’s first presentation of the National Threat Assessment Center's (NTAC) 2020 research on actionable plans to prevent violence in schools. The training is provided by the United States Secret Service (USSS) and is based on updated operational research conducted by the USSS and the NTAC. The training will offer best practices on preventing incidents of targeted school violence. This workshop will focus solely on how to proactively identify, assess, and manage individuals exhibiting concerning behavior based on USSS methodologies.
At the conclusion of the training, attendees will be able to:
·     Understand operational research on preventing incidents of targeted school violence;
·     Be able to proactively identify, using USSS methodologies, concerning behaviors prior to an incident;
·     Be able to assess concerning behaviors using best practice standards and use identified methods to better manage individuals who exhibit concerning behaviors with the goal of preventing school violence.

Charter Schools; Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
PENNSYLVANIA BULLETIN PROPOSED RULEMAKING DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION [ 22 PA. CODE CH. 711 ]

The award winning documentary Backpack Full of Cash that explores the siphoning of funds from traditional public schools by charters and vouchers will be shown in three locations in the Philadelphia suburbs in the upcoming weeks.
The film is narrated by Matt Damon, and some of the footage was shot in Philadelphia. 
Members of the public who are interested in becoming better informed about some of the challenges to public education posed by privatization are invited to attend.
At all locations, the film will start promptly at 7 pm, so it is suggested that members of the audience arrive 10-15 minutes prior to the start of the screening.   
Backpack Full of Cash hosted by State Representatives Mary Jo Daley, Tim Briggs, and Matt Bradford
Monday, January 6, 2020
Ludington Library 5 S. Bryn Mawr Avenue Bryn Mawr, PA 19010

PSBA Alumni Forum: Leaving school board service?
Continue your connection and commitment to public education by joining PSBA Alumni Forum. Benefits of the complimentary membership includes:
  • electronic access to PSBA Bulletin
  • legislative information via email
  • Daily EDition e-newsletter
  • Special access to one dedicated annual briefing
Register today online. Contact Crista Degregorio at Crista.Degregorio@psba.org with questions.

Register Today for PSBA/PASA/PAIU Advocacy Day at the Capitol-- March 23, 2020
PSBA Advocacy Day 2020 MAR 23, 2020 • 8:00 AM - 2:30 PM
STRENGTHEN OUR VOICE.
Join us in Harrisburg to support public education!
All school leaders are invited to attend Advocacy Day at the state Capitol in Harrisburg. The Pennsylvania School Boards Association (PSBA), Pennsylvania Association of Intermediate Units (PAIU) and the Pennsylvania Association of School Administrators (PASA) are partnering together to strengthen our advocacy impact. The day will center around meetings with legislators to discuss critical issues affecting public education.
Registration: As a membership benefit, there is no cost to register. Your legislator appointments will be coordinated with the completion of your registration. The day will begin with a continental breakfast and issue briefing prior to the legislator visits. Registrants will receive talking points, materials and leave-behinds to use with their meetings. Staff will be stationed at a table in the Main Rotunda during the day to answer questions and provide assistance.
Sign up today at myPSBA.org.

PSBA New and Advanced School Director Training in Dec & Jan
Do you want high-impact, engaging training that newly elected and reseated school directors can attend to be certified in new and advanced required training? PSBA has been supporting new school directors for more than 50 years by enlisting statewide experts in school law, finance and governance to deliver a one-day foundational training. This year, we are adding a parallel track of sessions for those who need advanced school director training to meet their compliance requirements. These sessions will be delivered by the same experts but with advanced content. Look for a compact evening training or a longer Saturday session at a location near you. All sites will include one hour of trauma-informed training required by Act 18 of 2019. Weekend sites will include an extra hour for a legislative update from PSBA’s government affairs team.
New School Director Training
Week Nights: Registration opens 3:00 p.m., program starts 3:30 p.m. -9:00 p.m., dinner with break included
Saturdays: Registration opens at 8:00 a.m., program starts at 9:00 a.m. -3:30 p.m., lunch with break included
Advanced School Director Training
Week Nights: Registration with dinner provided opens at 4:30 p.m., program starts 5:30 p.m. -9:00 p.m.
Saturdays: Registration opens at 10:00 a.m., program starts at 11:00 a.m.-3:30 p.m., lunch with break included
Locations and dates

Congress, Courts, and a National Election: 50 Million Children’s Futures Are at Stake. Be their champion at the 2020 Advocacy Institute.
NSBA Advocacy Institute Feb. 2-4, 2020 Marriot Marquis, Washington, D.C.
Join school leaders from across the country on Capitol Hill, Feb. 2-4, 2020 to influence the legislative agenda & shape decisions that impact public schools. Check out the schedule & more at https://nsba.org/Events/Advocacy-Institute

Register now for Network for Public Education Action National Conference in Philadelphia March 28-29, 2020
Registration, hotel information, keynote speakers and panels:

Any comments contained herein are my comments, alone, and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of any other person or organization that I may be affiliated with.



No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.