Started in November 2010, daily postings from the Keystone State
Education Coalition now reach more than 4050 Pennsylvania education
policymakers – school directors, administrators, legislators, legislative and
congressional staffers, Governor's staff, current/former PA Secretaries of
Education, Wolf education transition team members, superintendents, school solicitors,
principals, charter school leaders, PTO/PTA officers, parent advocates, teacher
leaders, business leaders, faith-based organizations, labor organizations,
education professors, members of the press and a broad array of P-16 regulatory
agencies, professional associations and education advocacy organizations via
emails, website, Facebook, Twitter, Instagram and LinkedIn.
These daily emails are archived and searchable at http://keystonestateeducationcoalition.org
Follow us on Twitter at @lfeinberg
“This commission would also examine how to implement
the state Special Education Funding Commission’s recommendations in the state’s
charter schools. That commission recommended a tiered payment system based on
the severity of a student’s disability, which was adopted regarding state aid
to districts. However, charter schools continue to get one payment regardless
of the severity of a student’s disability – a system that has been criticized
as a windfall for some charters because the payments are high while most
special education students in charter schools have milder, less expensive
disabilities.”
State Senate Appropriations Committee approves
establishment of charter school funding commission
Among the
commission's tasks would be examining the financial oversight of schools and
management companies.
The notebook by Greg Windle June 19 — 11:37 am, 2019
Updated (4:14 pm) to include a quote from School Board President Joyce Wilkerson.
The General
Assembly would establish a commission to review the state’s method for funding
charter schools and suggest changes under a bill that was unanimously approved
Tuesday by the Senate Appropriations Committee. The Charter School Funding Advisory
Commission would compare Pennsylvania’s funding mechanism to those in other
states and base its recommendations on the actual cost of educating students in
charters of all kinds. The commission’s scope extends more broadly, as well,
encompassing the financial oversight by districts and the state of charter
schools, management companies, and facilities. Based on the Special Education
Commission and the PlanCon Advisory Committee, it will hold public hearings to
consider making further recommendations. “Our current charter funding systems
create many inequities,” School Board President Joyce Wilkerson said in a
statement. “We support action by the General Assembly to help resolve these
inequities, including the proposed Charter School Funding Commission.” The
commission would issue a report after 18 months if Senate Bill 806 passes.
Short of going up for a full vote in both houses of the legislature, the bill
could be incorporated into an “omnibus” school code during budget negotiations
next week, according to a source in the State Senate. The bill was introduced
by Republican State Sen. Pat Browne of Allentown.
Blogger note:
Total cyber charter tuition paid by PA taxpayers from 500 school districts for
2013, 2014, 2015 and 2016 was over $1.6 billion; $393.5 million, $398.8
million, $436.1 million and $454.7 million respectively.
In 2016-17,
taxpayers in Senate President Pro Tempore @SenatorScarnati’s school districts
in Bradford, Clarion, Clearfield, Clinton, Elk, Forest, Jefferson, Lycoming,
McKean, Potter and Tioga Counties had to send over $10.7 million to chronically
underperforming cybers that they never authorized. #SB34 (Schwank) or #HB526
(Sonney) could change that.
Data source: PDE via .@PSBA
Data source: PDE via .@PSBA
|
Austin Area SD
|
$2,875.00
|
|
Bradford Area SD
|
$416,092.34
|
|
Brockway Area SD
|
$149,942.34
|
|
Brookville Area SD
|
$248,130.96
|
|
Cameron County SD
|
$467,303.38
|
|
Canton Area SD
|
$219,358.83
|
|
Clarion-Limestone Area SD
|
$274,246.66
|
|
Clearfield Area SD
|
$847,317.65
|
|
Coudersport Area SD
|
$261,597.67
|
|
Dubois Area SD
|
$781,498.59
|
|
Forest Area SD
|
$326,168.02
|
|
Galeton Area SD
|
$367,370.95
|
|
Jersey Shore Area SD
|
$729,876.96
|
|
Johnsonburg Area SD
|
$259,139.74
|
|
Kane Area SD
|
$146,979.43
|
|
Keystone Central SD
|
$1,077,260.40
|
|
Northern Potter SD
|
$67,549.21
|
|
Northern Tioga SD
|
$423,039.27
|
|
Oswayo Valley SD
|
$75,472.38
|
|
Otto-Eldred SD
|
$170,310.95
|
|
Port Allegany SD
|
$140,633.48
|
|
Punxsutawney Area SD
|
$1,066,764.18
|
|
Ridgway Area SD
|
$223,709.93
|
|
Smethport Area SD
|
$337,873.37
|
|
Southern Tioga SD
|
$650,426.40
|
|
Saint Marys Area SD
|
$256,147.70
|
|
Wellsboro Area SD
|
$472,963.79
|
|
West Branch Area SD
|
$323,061.45
|
|
Total:
|
$10,783,111.03
|
Has your state
senator cosponsored bipartisan SB34?
https://www.legis.state.pa.us/cfdocs/billInfo/bill_history.cfm?syear=2019&sind=0&body=S&type=B&bn=34
Is your state
representative one of the over 70 bipartisan cosponsors of HB526?
Who decides whether charter schools open in Pa.? Not just
your local school district.
Inquirer by Maddie Hanna, Updated: June 19, 2019- 6:25 PM
The charter school
proposed for West Philadelphia had failed to submit a fully developed
curriculum. Its management company hadn’t demonstrated that the schools it runs
should be replicated, according to the school district. Thus the school board
last week for
a second time denied a charter for
the dance-themed Joan Myers Brown Academy. Although it chose not to, String
Theory, the charter’s operator, could have appealed. In Pennsylvania, school
districts don’t have the final say over the fates of the charter schools that
they are tasked with regulating. That belongs instead to the Pennsylvania
Charter Appeals Board — one of only two such boards in the nation, according to
the National Association of Charter School Authorizers. Created shortly after
Pennsylvania passed its charter-school law in 1997, the appeals board has long
been controversial for its ability to overturn decisions of the local school
boards that regulate charter schools. In addition to the secretary of
education, Pennsylvania’s board is supposed to have six members appointed by
the governor. But it currently only has five. And all
are serving under expired terms
— some since 2015. Gov. Tom Wolf, a Democrat now in his fifth year, hasn’t
nominated anyone to the board. Every member was appointed by his Republican
predecessor, Gov. Tom Corbett, whose administration was more supportive of
charter schools.
Here’s a primer on
the board and why it matters:
What is the Charter School Appeal Board?
The Charter School
Appeal Board (CAB) consists of the Secretary of Education and six members who
are appointed by the Governor and with the consent of a majority of all the
Senate members. The members include a parent of a school-aged child, a
school board member, a certified teacher actively employed in a public school,
a faculty member or administrative employee of a higher education institution,
a member of the business community, and a member of the State Board of Education.
PDE provides assistance and staffing and the Governor’s General Counsel
provides legal advice and assistance to CAB. CAB has the exclusive review
of a decision by a local school board to deny a charter application and of a
decision by a local school board to not renew or revoke a charter. CAB
also has the exclusive review of a decision by PDE to deny a cyber charter
application and of a decision by PDE to not renew or revoke a cyber
charter. In addition, CAB has exclusive review of a direct appeal filed
by a charter applicant when the local school board fails to hold a public
hearing or timely act on a charter application and of a direct appeal filed by
a cyber charter applicant when PDE fails to hold a public hearing or timely act
on a cyber charter application. The following documents contain additional
information about CAB.
Charter Appeal Board Members
Pennsylvania
Department of Education Website
Pedro A. Rivera,
Secretary of Education, and Chair, State Charter Appeal Board, as of January
21, 2015.
Name Appointed Expires
Higher Education
Member - Vacant
Cook, Julie A., A
certified teacher in a public school* 10/14/2014 6/14/2018
Miller, Scott E.,
Business Member* 4/7/2014 6/14/2015
Munger, Lee Ann,
Parent of a school-aged child* 6/20/2011 6/14/2017
Peri, Jonathan E.,
State Board of Education Member* 6/3/2014 6/14/2017
Yanyanin, Mitchell
J., School Board Member* 6/20/2011 6/14/2015
Sara Hockenberry,
Counsel
* Appointed by Governor Corbett
Pursuant to section
1721-A of the Charter School Law, the term of office of members of the appeal
board, other than the Secretary, shall be for a period of four years or until a
successor is appointed and qualified. 24 P.S. § 17-1721-A.
Please direct all
media inquiries to the Pennsylvania Department of Education’s Press and
Communications Office: elevis@pa.gov or 717- 783-9802.
“Of all the bad
news in this report, none is more alarming than the fact that students in cyber
charter schools fare far worse than any other students in the state. Compared
to students in traditional public schools, on average, cyber charter students
perform as if they’ve had 106 fewer days of reading in school and 118 fewer
days in math class. Keep in mind, there are only 180 days in a school year.”
Pa.’s charter school package doesn’t count as real reform
| Opinion
Bernie O’Neill, for
the Inquirer Updated: June 19, 2019 - 1:01 PM
Bernie
O’Neill is the former Republican State Representative for Bucks County.
If you weren’t
worried about the rising cost of public education before now — you should be.
If Pennsylvania passes the charter bills currently in the State Senate, expect
more of the same: higher school taxes and disappointing news on school
performance. Last week, the PA House passed a set
of bills proffered
to “fix”
Pennsylvania’s charter school
law. Yet the bills
fail to address necessary charter school funding reform, and two of the bills
(HB 356 and 357) specifically allow charters to expand without adequate
oversight. In fact, a proposed amendment to the package that would have
required a rigorous charter accountability system failed by a vote of 100-99.
Harrisburg — what are you thinking? Just last week, Stanford University’s
Center for Research on Education Outcomes (CREDO) released a study on charter school performance in Pennsylvania that should be
sounding alarms in the minds of legislators across the state. Despite decades
of investments, Pennsylvania’s charter school students aren’t showing the
results promised or hoped for. Student reading performance is similar for
charters and traditional public schools, and in math, charter school students
are doing worse than their public-school peers. To be sure, the report finds
that black, Hispanic, and students in poverty attending brick and mortar
charters have made some gains in reading compared to peers in traditional
public schools. Those gains are modest — 35 additional days of learning in
reading. My guess is they were also made at the expense of students in public
schools because school districts must pay for every new seat in a charter
school, leaving them less money to spend on traditional public classrooms.
“…the EITC/OSTC programs divert tax dollars into
private organizations that have no public budgets, no public check registers,
no public meetings, no Sunshine laws, and no right-to-know laws. As a result,
there is virtually no public scrutiny or accountability for how this money is
spent.”
Pa’s public schools
need our help. Gov. Tom Wolf was right to veto private school tax credit bill |
Opinion
By Susan Spicka Capital-Star Op-Ed
Contributor June 20,
2019
Susan Spicka is the executive director of the
advocacy group Education Voters of Pennsylvania. She writes from Shippensburg,
Pa.
It’s budget season
in Harrisburg. At a time of year when we should be talking about funding to
meet public schools’ needs, instead we’ve been hearing more about massive
giveaways of taxpayer dollars to well-off families who send their children to
private schools. The Pennsylvania House and Senate passed legislation sponsored
by House Speaker Mike Turzai, R-Allegheny, allowing for a
massive expansion, from $110 million to $210 million, of the Educational Improvement Tax Credit. The two-decade-old
program provides tax credits to businesses and other organizations that fund
scholarship aid for religious and private schools. A built-in,10 percent annual
increase in EITC funding in Turzai’s bill would have brought the total annual
funding for the EITC program to an eye-popping $544 million in just 10 years. Gov.
Tom Wolf vetoed the legislation, and he was correct to do this. The EITC
program, and its partner, the Opportunity Scholarship Tax Credit (OSTC)
program, are intentionally designed to provide taxpayer-funded
private/religious school tuition vouchers to well-off families that are already
comfortably paying their children’s private school tuition.
“The more complicated part is a built-in 10% increase every year.
Again, for context, every school district faces
endless discussion about whether taxes will go up or should go up and why. The
public sweats bullets over the difference between a 1% increase and a 2%, and
that makes sense. That’s real money coming out of real bank accounts. On a
fixed income, that percentage can be the difference between paying your taxes
or a sheriff’s sale. So why should money that would flow to private or parochial
schools not face the same annual scrutiny? Spending decisions are supposed to
be done annually to keep control. Would anyone greenlight an automatic 10%
increase in school taxes each year? Probably not.”
Editorial: School tax
credits are taxes too
TRIBUNE-REVIEW
Editorial | Wednesday, June 19, 2019 4:01 p.m.
What are you OK
paying more for every year? Automatically. Without question. What would you
sign up for today knowing that it could — and would — escalate annually every
Jan. 1?
Is there anything? Gov.
Tom Wolf vetoed
a bill to
that effect. The topic of the bill is worth debate and there is legitimate
support on both sides. It was the Educational
Improvement Tax Credit, and that’s
something to talk about. We
need to discuss education. We need to
explore options. Are public schools doing the best they can? Are private
schools up to snuff? Are parochial schools meeting the same requirements when
it comes to testing, and should they? What about cyber programs? And who should
pay for it all? Should poor kids be shut out of the diversity of opportunities
that are open to rich families? Those are all important questions that need to
not just be asked, but answered honestly. So it isn’t surprising that there
were people who very much supported a large increase in the tax credit. The
bill would have bumped funding for private school scholarships from $100
million up to $210 million.
Success of rural schools important
Indiana Gazette
Opinion by Edward J. Albert, Ed.D, Executive
director Pa. Association of Rural and Small Schools Jun 18, 2019
Recently, an editorial
by superintendents from several large, urban school districts ran in
Pennsylvania’s city newspapers. It highlighted the important role city schools
play in preparing students for the 21st century economy and the real and urgent
needs their students face. It called on state leaders to fix Pennsylvania’s
broken state funding system and invest more in our public schools. Those urban
school leaders are right. Pennsylvania’s success will be determined by how well
we educate our children, and our children need more. But that extends beyond
our cities to our small towns and rural regions. The state’s failure to pay its
fair share for public education is hurting rural students. Rural schools
struggle to find enough resources to keep buildings safe and in good repair,
protect academic and extracurricular programs from elimination, and give
students up-to-date books and technology. Rural schools strive to give students
with disabilities or special needs what they deserve to reach their potential
and make sure students have career and technical opportunities that prepare
them for today’s workforce and a successful future. Many rural districts must
meet the needs of children living in poverty but have a limited tax base to
generate enough revenues locally. There is a budget proposal on the table to
increase state funding for basic, special and career and technical education by
$260 million next school year. Pennsylvania’s school children need every penny.
All our state legislators should immediately commit to provide at least that
much in this year’s budget.
Wolf vetoes school choice expansion
Daily Item By John
Finnerty jfinnerty@cnhi.com June 18, 2019
HARRISBURG — Gov.
Tom Wolf issued his first veto of the year Tuesday, spiking a bill that would
have greatly expanded a tax credit program that benefits scholarship programs
used to cover private school tuition. House Bill 800, authored by House Speaker
Mike Turzai, R-Allegheny County, would have doubled the amount of tax credits
available for the Educational Improvement Tax Credit while also raising the
income limits for families to be eligible for scholarships covered by the
program. Under the plan, the state would have offered up to $210 million in tax
credits and allowed families earning $95,000 to benefit from the scholarships
funded by those donations. The measure passed the state Senate last week, after
passing in the state House last month. The legislation didn’t pass with enough
support in either chamber to suggest there are enough votes to override Wolf’s
veto. In his veto message, Wolf said the tax credits for private schools lacks
accountability and oversight.
“The Erie School Board held a hearing on Wednesday
night on whether to renew the charter for the Erie Rise Leadership Academy
Charter School, 1006 W. 10th St., at Cascade Street. The board must wait at
least 30 days to vote on the renewal.”
Erie Rise, school district clash over charter’s future
GoErie By Ed
Palattella Posted Jun 19, 2019 at 9:42 PM Updated
at 5:34 AM
At Erie
School Board hearing, school district administration contends standardized test
scores, other data show Erie Rise is failing. Charter school argues otherwise.
The Erie Rise
Leadership Academy Charter School, at risk of losing its charter, defended
itself before the Erie School Board late into Wednesday night by arguing that
the Erie School District lacked evidence and direct observation to stop the
school from operating. The Erie School District argued that it has plenty of
evidence on its side. The charter school’s solicitor, Thomas Fitzpatrick,
focused, in part, on state data that shows 100 percent of Erie Rise’s students
are economically disadvantaged. He also questioned whether the Erie School
District was placing unfair expectations on Erie Rise, which in its charter
application said its students would score no lower than 89 percent on
standardized test scores in math and reading. Erie Rise has fallen well short
of those numbers since the school was founded in 2011, according to state data.
“Those goals are aspirational,” Fitzpatrick said. Fitzpatrick commented after a
lawyer for the Erie School Board, Tim Sennett, spent two and half hours
presenting the Erie School District administration’s case for why the board
should not renew Erie Rise’s charter for another five years. Sennett’s only
witness was Neal Brokman, the Erie School District’s executive director of
operations.
Based on the
evidence, including poor test scores, Sennett asked Brokman whether “students
that are enrolled at Erie Rise would be better off if they returned to their
Erie School District home schools.”
School improvement plans outlined for Reading School
Board
WFMZ By: Gregory Purcell Posted: Jun
19, 2019 11:31 PM EDT
READING, Pa. -
Leaders from Reading High School, Reading Intermediate High School and Southern
Junior High School presented highlights from their school improvement plans for
2019-2020 to the Reading School Board at its Committee of the Whole Meeting on
Wednesday. Reading High School Principal Eric Turman outlined three challenges
and three solutions that his school will address. He said they want to foster a
culture of high expectations of success for all students, educators, families,
and community members. In order to do so, the school will develop vision and
value statements for all stakeholders; in addition, the school will create
plans to support each stakeholder to achieve this vision. He said they want to
promote and sustain a positive school environment where all members feel
welcomed, supported and safe in school: socially, emotionally, intellectually,
and physically. He said to do so, Reading High will create a culture of
collaboration and respect for the various voices within stakeholder groups. He
said they want to build leadership capacity and empower staff in the
development and successful implementation of initiatives that better serve
students, staff and the school. To do this, he said the school will restructure
the decision-making process to gain input from stakeholders and create open
opportunities for staff to serve in leadership positions.
“Bell toured
Cassidy Elementary in West Philadelphia, considered one of the most toxic
public schools in the city due to elevated lead and asbestos levels. The School
District of Philadelphia is building a $30 million facility to replace the
school.”
CNN docuseries shines light on lead poisoning, pollution
in Philly and Chester
'United
Shades of America' tours Covanta incinerator, Cassidy Elementary School
Television
host W. Kamau Bell visited Philadelphia and neighboring Chester, Delaware
County to examine the adverse affects of waste pollution and lead poisoning.
BY JOHN KOPP PhillyVoice Staff UPDATED
JUN 17, 2019 AT 01:23 PM
Television host W.
Kamau Bell received a foul introduction to Chester on the most recent episode
of CNN docuseries "United Shades of America." Riding alongside Zulene
Mayfield, an environmental rights advocate, Bell caught a strong whiff of the
Covanta incineration plant, the largest in the United States. "It's
nauseating," Mayfield said. "You will feel it in your throat, in your
eyes, every membrane that you have. Welcome to Chester." The episode,
dubbed "Toxic America," aired Sunday night and examined the effects
of industrial waste pollution in Chester, Delaware County, and lead poisoning
in neighboring Philadelphia. Bell pointed to various adverse health effects
caused by air pollution – including cancer, respiratory issues and hormonal
defects – and lead poisoning, including cognitive delays, behavioral issues and
seizures. "The fact is, kids, whether you live in rural, urban or suburban
America, man-made disasters are becoming more common," Bell said.
"And while many of these issues, of course, affect people of all races,
it's not surprising that in America, native people, black people, Latino people
and other people of color – we tend to get it the worst."
Secret Service
teaches safe school initiatives at Neumann
Delco Times By Kevin Tustin
ktustin@21st-centurymedia.com June 20, 2019
ASTON — Hundreds of
educators and emergency personnel from around the region were schooled by the
U.S. Secret Service Wednesday on some of the best practices to promote safe
schools in their communities. Neumann University hosted the federal law
enforcement agency’s first East Coast presentation of its Safe School
Initiative training program in the all-day seminar that covered prevention,
school climate and cybersecurity. The Secret Service's National Threat
Assessment Center, National Computer Forensics Institute and Forensics Services
Division contributed to the day’s presentations. “We’re providing the
information from the Safe Schools Initiative study. Certainly, after the
Marjory Stoneman Douglas shooting (from February 2018), we’ve been doubling our
efforts in the study of violence in schools,” said Philadelphia Secret Service
Special Agent in Charge James Henry. “It’s us being able to give our best practices
and recommendations along the way to best prevent these crimes.”
House Approves Record-High Spending Figure for the Education
Department
Education Week
Politics K12 Blog By Andrew Ujifusa on June 19, 2019 4:08 PM
The House of
Representatives voted Wednesday to approve what would be a record-high funding
level for the U.S. Department of Education in nominal terms, although there's a
long slog ahead before Congress sends a final spending bill to President Donald
Trump for his signature. Title I, special education, and social-emotional
learning would be big winners under
the bill crafted by Democrats, who
control the House. And in keeping with much of the mood in the 2020 Democratic
presidential primary, charter school funding would get slashed by nearly 10
percent. Lawmakers also passed spending bills for the Department of Health and
Human Services, the Department of Labor, and other federal agencies as part of
a broader spending package. Overall, the legislation would provide
roughly $75.9 billion to the U.S. Department of Education for fiscal 2020,
which will start Oct. 1. That would be a record high fiigure for department
funding, although not after adjusting for inflation, and $4.4 billion above
current levels. More specifically, it
would provide $42.2 billion for K-12, an increase of $3.4 billion over current fiscal 2019 levels. By
contrast, President Donald Trump's budget request sought to slash total
department funding to $64 billion, and would cut K-12 spending from $38.8
billion to $34.1 billion.
2020 cheat sheet: What the Democratic presidential
candidates have said about education
Chalkbeat BY CAMILLE RESPESS - JUNE 13, 2019 - UPDATED JUNE 14, 2019
Education is hardly
the only issue driving the 2020 presidential campaign. But policies affecting
schools and students are emerging as some of the most talked-about. Within the
crowded field of Democrats seeking to unseat Donald Trump, some candidates are
reckoning with long-standing stances on education issues — including Cory
Booker, who has downplayed his past support for charter schools on the campaign
trail. Others, such as Kamala Harris, are formulating wide-ranging
education policy plans for the first time. Bernie Sanders, meanwhile, has
distinguished himself by taking an aggressive stand against charter schools.
We’ve collected
what we know about each Democratic candidate’s views on education issues here
and filled it with links where you can learn more. We’ll continuously update
this page as candidates share more.
The deadline to
submit a cover letter, resume and application is August 19,
2019.
Become a 2019-2020 PSBA Advocacy Ambassador
PSBA is seeking
applications for two open Advocacy Ambassador positions. Candidates
should have experience in day-to-day functions of a school district,
on the school board, or in a school leadership position. The purpose of the
PSBA Advocacy Ambassador program is to facilitate the education and engagement
of local school directors and public education stakeholders through the
advocacy leadership of the ambassadors. Each Advocacy Ambassador will
be responsible for assisting PSBA in achieving its advocacy goals. To
achieve their mission, ambassadors will be kept up to date on current
legislation and PSBA positions on legislation. The current open positions will
cover PSBA Sections 3 and 4, and Section 7.
PSBA Advocacy
Ambassadors are independent contractors representing PSBA and serve
as liaisons between PSBA and their local elected officials. Advocacy
Ambassadors also commit to building strong relationships with PSBA members with
the purpose of engaging the designated members to be active and committed
grassroots advocates for PSBA’s legislative priorities.
PSBA: Nominations for The Allwein Society are open!
This award program
recognizes school directors who are outstanding leaders & advocates on
behalf of public schools & students. Nominations are accepted year-round
with selections announced early fall: http://ow.ly/CchG50uDoxq
EPLC is accepting
applications for the 2019-20 PA Education Policy Fellowship Program
Education Policy & Leadership Center
PA's premier education policy leadership program for education, policy
& community leaders with 582 alumni since 1999. Application with program
schedule & agenda are at http://www.eplc.org
2019 PASA-PSBA School
Leadership Conference Oct. 16-18, 2019
WHERE: Hershey Lodge and
Convention Center 325 University Drive, Hershey, PA
WHEN: Wednesday, October
16 to Friday, October 18, 201
Registration is now open!
Growth from knowledge acquired. Vision inspired by innovation. Impact
created by a synergized leadership community. You are called upon to be the
drivers of a thriving public education system. It’s a complex and challenging
role. Expand your skillset and give yourself the tools needed for the
challenge. Packed into two and a half daysꟷꟷgain access to top-notch education
and insights, dynamic speakers, peer learning opportunities and the latest
product and service innovations. Come to the PASA-PSBA School Leadership
Conference to grow!
NPE Action National
Conference - Save the Date - March 28-29, 2020 in Philadelphia, PA.
The window is now open for workshop proposals for the Network for Public
Education conference, March 28-29, 2020, in Philadelphia. I hope you all sign
on to present on a panel and certainly we want all to attend. https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/NBCNDKK
Any comments contained herein are my comments, alone, and
do not necessarily reflect the opinions of any other person or organization
that I may be affiliated with.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.