Daily postings from the Keystone State Education Coalition now
reach more than 3950 Pennsylvania education policymakers – school directors,
administrators, legislators, legislative and congressional staffers, Governor's
staff, current/former PA Secretaries of Education, Wolf education transition
team members, superintendents, school solicitors, principals, PTO/PTA officers,
parent advocates, teacher leaders, business leaders, faith-based organizations,
labor organizations, education professors, members of the press and a broad
array of P-16 regulatory agencies, professional associations and education
advocacy organizations via emails, website, Facebook, Twitter and LinkedIn
These daily emails are archived and searchable at http://keystonestateeducationcoalition.org
Follow us on Twitter at @lfeinberg
Keystone
State Education Coalition
PA
Ed Policy Roundup for November 9, 2016
Mass.
voters reject ballot question on charter schools; 62% to 38%
Education Week By Andrew Ujifusa November 9, 2016
Republican Donald Trump, whose brash campaign for the White House included strong support for school choice and sharp denunciations of current education policy, has been elected president of the United States, the Associated Press reported early Wednesday. Trump’s victory in the presidential race leaves widespread uncertainty about what’s in store for public schools under the first Republican administration in eight years. Aside from school choice, Trump, a New York-based real estate developer, spent very little time talking about K-12 education during his campaign. And he has no track record to speak of or draw on for insights into what he may propose. “We’re all engaging in a lot of speculation because there hasn’t been a lot of serious discussion about this, especially in the Trump campaign,” said Martin R. West, an associate professor of education at Harvard University who has advised Republicans, including 2012 GOP nominee Mitt Romney and Sen. Lamar Alexander, R-Tenn., on education issues. Trump did propose a $20 billion federal plan to dramatically expand school choice for low-income students. His plan would allow students to use federal funds to help them attend private, charter, magnet, and traditional public schools of their choice. It’s also designed to leverage additional state investments in school choice of up to $100 billion nationwide.
Donald Trump Wins Presidency, Brings
Uncertainty to Big Education Issues
Education
Week Politics K12 Blog By Andrew Ujifusa on November
9, 2016 6:28 AM
Republican nominee Donald
Trump has been elected president, according to the Associated Press. The
real estate executive has largely ignored education during his successful
presidential bid, except for a $20 billion federal investment in school choice
he announced in September. And there are a lot of unanswered questions about what
his administration will mean for public schools. Having never held elected office, Trump's
K-12 record was already relatively thin compared to some of his opponents when
he began running last year. He's mostly discussed public schools in sound
bites, claiming that he would get rid of the Common Core State Standards (which
aren't a federal program) as well as gun-free school zones. And his election could represent a serious
threat to the U.S. Department of Education, which he has said he'd either
drastically cut or eliminate altogether. Plus, key Obama-era regulations
governing the Every Student Succeeds Act, which many Republicans have said they
dislike, could also be rescinded by Trump.
Republicans Keep Control of Congress, Set
to Work With President-Elect Trump
Education
Week Politics K12 Blog by Andrew Ujifusa on November
9, 2016 8:28 AM
Republicans have kept their
control of Congress, according to election returns reported Tuesday night,
meaning that the push by GOP lawmakers against what it perceives as
heavy-handed oversight by the U.S. Department of Education regarding the Every
Student Succeeds Act will likely continue. However, the House of
Representatives will soon have a new leader of its education committee, thanks
to the retirement of its chairman Rep. John Kline, R-Minn. The election of Donald Trump as
president could shift a lot of power over education policy to congressional
Republicans, in part because Trump has not shown a great deal of interest in
K-12 on the campaign trail—apart from his plan to create a $20 billion
federal program to fund school choice at public and private schools. Congress
previously rejected a similar idea during negotiations last year over what
became ESSA, but Trump's presidency may get the proposal a fresh look from
lawmakers. The membership of education
committees in Congress emerged largely unscathed from the election. Among
lawmakers on the Senate education committee, for example, only Sen. Mark
Kirk, R-Ill., lost his bid for re-election to Rep. Tammy Duckworth, D-Ill.
In the House, Rep. Carlos Curbelo, R-Fla. and who was in one of the
closest-fought election battles among House education committee members, also
held onto his seat. Although
public school policy wasn't a particularly big issue during the 2016 campaign,
Congress could still get very busy when it comes to education in general.
Trump Happened
Education
Next By Frederick Hess 11/09/2016Wow. I didn’t see that coming. Like most everyone else, I expected to see a comfortable Clinton win. I thought the big question was whether Republicans might find a way to hold the U.S. Senate. And then Trump happened. Trump narrowly beat Hillary Clinton, piercing the Democrats’ “blue wall.” The Republicans lost a handful of seats but held their solid majority in the House. The GOP wound up narrowly holding the Senate—with Wisconsin’sRon Johnson, Missouri’s Roy Blunt, Pennsylvania’s Pat Toomey, North Carolina’s Richard Burr, and several others fending off fierce challenges. In other words, Trump had no coattails, but the result is that a Republican president is going to take office with Republican majorities in both houses of Congress for the first time since 1928. Yep, 1928. What does this mean for education?
Now
what?
EdExcellence by Michael
J. Petrilli November 09, 2016
Like most of you I am in shock
and more than a little worried. I can’t pretend to be a neutral policy analyst
today; I made my deep concerns known about a Donald Trump presidency,
and they haven’t gone away. His thin-skinned temperament, his bullying tendencies,
his scapegoating of Mexican-Americans and Muslim-Americans, his support from
White Nationalists and Vladimir Putin, his impulsive attacks on free speech and
our allies around the world—none of that has evaporated in the light of day. But as I told my young boys this morning,
America will persevere. We will support our president and give him a chance to
show true leadership—to bring us together, as he promised in the wee hours last
night. We will trust—but verify. If he attacks our Constitution, or our fellow
citizens, or our allies, we will push back. We will use the tools of our
democracy—our independent media, our institutions of civil society—to resist
when necessary. We will be OK. As for
what happened yesterday, we should be careful in how we interpret the “primal
scream,” as one commentator put it, coming from America’s white working class,
from the overwhelmingly red, rural parts of our beautiful country.
Diane Ravitch’s Blog By dianeravitch November 9, 2016
I’m still in a state of shock, after watching the election returns. The best qualified candidate in modern history was defeated by the least qualified candidate in history. President-elect Donald J. Trump appealed to fear of the Other….and won. The pundits and editorial writers will have much to feed upon in the days ahead. The world is reacting. Global stock markets are in free fall. That affects our savings, our pensions, the equity in our homes. What does this mean for education? The Republican Party is committed to school choice. Trump rarely spoke about education but this is the little we know. He pledged to take $20 billion from existing federal programs, probably Title I, and give it to the states to be used for charters and vouchers. It will be up to the states to protect what they can of public education.
Sept 2016: See Who's Been Tapped to Lead
Trump's Transition Team for Education
Education
Week Politics K12 Blog By Andrew Ujifusa on September
19, 2016 7:21 AM
Republican presidential nominee Donald
Trump has picked Williamson M. Evers, a research fellow at the Hoover
Institution at Stanford University, and Gerard Robinson, a resident fellow at
the American Enterprise Institute, to be on his presidential transition team
for education, according to multiple sources.
Evers served as an assistant secretary for policy at the U.S.
Department of Education from 2007 to 2009, and also was an adviser to
former U.S. Secretary of Education Margaret Spellings in 2007 under President
George W. Bush. Robinson served as Florida's education commissioner from
2011 to 2012, and has also served as Virginia's education secretary and as the
president of the Black Alliance for Educational Options. Neither the Trump transition team nor the
Trump campaign responded to requests for comment. Both Evers and Robinson
referred questions about their positions to the Trump campaign.
PA Republicans build on their majorities
in the General Assembly in Tuesday's election
Penn Live By Jan Murphy |
jmurphy@pennlive.com Email the author | Follow on Twitter on
November 09, 2016 at 4:04 AM, updated November 09, 2016 at 7:07 AM
If Gov. Tom Wolf thought he had
his hands full dealing with the Republican-controlled General Assembly in his
first two years on the job, it's not going to get any better in the next two. When the next legislative session begins,
Wolf will be working with a larger Republican majority in the House and a more
powerful one in the Senate. The House
will begin with the largest Republican majority it has had in 60 years
following Tuesday's general election that increased the GOP-held seats by
three, giving the Republicans a 122-81 advantage over Democrats. …Over in the Senate, the defeat of Democratic
incumbents Rob Teplitz and Sean Wiley, along with flipping an open seat
controlled by Democrats, brings the Republicans' advantage to 34-16 over
Democrats.
With 34 votes, Republicans have
the ability to guarantee that their chamber can override any of Wolf's vetoes,
of which there have been plenty in his first nearly two years in office. Time
will tell if this leads to more gridlock or a more compromising attitude
between the legislative and executive branches.
Bucks County Courier Times November
9, 2016
Among the myriad problems
confronting Pennsylvania government, the most critical might well be the $60
billion unfunded liability in the state's two largest pension funds: the Public
School Employees' Retirement System (PSERS) and the State Employees' Retirement
System (SERS). Compounding what is already a
financial meltdown in the making has been the utter futility of state lawmakers
to address the crisis in any meaningful way, even though all the warning signs
have been pointing to disaster for several years. In the weeks leading up to Tuesday's
election, we interviewed several candidates for the state House, both
incumbents and challengers. A disappointing common thread running through most
of those interviews was the absence of any ideas that might hold a solution to
the pension problem. We heard everything from teachers aren't paid enough and
401(k)s are not a good option to pensions could be reduced a little and more
money needs to be spent on education. Implicit in almost every candidate's
response to the pension question was a strong hint of resignation, as if to
say, "I don't know how we can fix this."
Who should run Philadelphia's schools?
The notebook November 8, 2016 —
11:38am
The Notebook, Philadelphia Media
Network and Drexel University's School of Education will host a public forum to
discuss alternative models of school system governance Dec. 8. Who should run Philadelphia's schools? Join
us Dec. 8 for a public forum featuring state, city and civic leaders sponsored
by Philadelphia Media Network, the Philadelphia Public School Notebook and
Drexel University's School of Education.
It’s been 15 years since the state took control of Philadelphia's
schools and created the School Reform Commission. Since then, the SRC has been
a polarizing presence in the city.
With the recent resignation of two members of the commission and the
term of a third expiring soon, the future of the SRC and the issue of school
governance is once again at the forefront of the civic dialogue. Is the SRC the
only model to consider? Should Philadelphia create an elected school
board? Should the governing body be controlled by the mayor? Are there models
in other cities that could help us rethink our District's governance?
The Philadelphia Public
School Notebook, Philadelphia Media Network – owner of the Philadelphia
Inquirer, Philadelphia Daily News and philly.com
– and Drexel University's School of Education are hosting a public forum
on this critical issue. We’ll explore it from a variety of angles,
including findings from important research on school governance and a
panel discussion among city, state and civic leaders.
Commentary: Lancaster schools adapt to
meet needs of refugees
Philly.com By Harvey
Miller and Damaris Rau Updated: NOVEMBER
9, 2016 — 3:01 AM EST
Harvey Miller is president of the
School District of Lancaster Board. Damaris
Rau is the district superintendent.
The School District of Lancaster
is proudly and effectively serving and educating one of the largest per capita
refugee student populations in Pennsylvania. Yet, despite our many programs to
help these students and their families, we currently find ourselves the target
of a lawsuit by the American Civil Liberties Union, which claims our
educational decisions are somehow discriminatory. Nothing could be further from the truth. Last school year, nearly 600 refugee students
were enrolled in our district at all grade levels. The lawsuit centers on fewer
than 20 of those students, young adults from 17 to 21 who would stand little
chance of graduating by their 21st birthday if they attended the district's
main high school. In order to give them
- and any overage and under-credited student in the district - a better
opportunity to graduate they attend a smaller alternative school called Phoenix
Academy, which has smaller class sizes and more personalized instruction.
Phoenix Academy also has certified English as a Second Language (ESL) teachers
to ensure foreign language-speaking students learn English.
Mass. charters, Ga. school takeovers:
Voters decide four education ballot questions
Washington Post By Emma Brown November
9 at 12:43 AM
Though the presidential race
cliffhanger was taking up most of the oxygen Tuesday evening, there were also
important education policy developments in the states. How four high-profile
ballot initiatives fared:
Mass.
voters reject ballot question on charter schools; 62% to 38%
By David Scharfenberg BOSTON GLOBE STAFF NOVEMBER
08, 2016
Massachusetts voters
overwhelmingly rejected a major expansion of charter schools Tuesday, brushing
aside calls for greater choice amid concerns about the overall health of public
education.
The vote is a major victory for
teachers unions and civil rights organizations, which argued that charters are
diverting too much money and attention from traditional public schools that
serve the overwhelming majority of students.
“It’s really clear from the results of this election that people are
interested in public education and value that,” said Barbara Madeloni,
president of the Massachusetts Teachers Association and a leading opponent of
Question 2, at an election night party at the Fairmont Copley Plaza in Boston.
“There should be no conversation about expanding charters,” she added, until
the Legislature moves to “fully fund our public schools.”
With 87 percent of precincts
reporting early Wednesday, the “no” side was leading 62 percent to 38 percent.
Georgia voters say “no” to Opportunity
School District
By Ty Tagami - The Atlanta
Journal-Constitution Updated: 1:23 a.m. Wednesday, Nov. 9,
2016 | Posted: 9:59 p.m. Tuesday, Nov. 8, 2016
Georgia voters have demanded that
schools remain under local control.
Six out of 10 votes cast on
Amendment 1 opposed the constitutional amendment to allow a state takeover of
the state’s worst performing schools. The
amendment would have established a statewide Opportunity School District to be
run by a new state agency with authority to take schools deemed to be
“chronically failing” from the control of local school boards. Polling before the election showed strong opposition by
Republicans and Democrats, as likely voters said they didn’t want to surrender
local control of schools. Gov. Nathan
Deal pushed the referendum through the General Assembly last year, passing it
with strong Republican support. He then campaigned for it, saying school
districts had trapped mostly poor and minority students in failing schools and
in a cycle of poverty spanning generations.
Opponents criticized it as a vague proposal that brought no new
resources to struggling schools.
We recently traveled to England to learn what we could about the plan. We interviewed key stakeholders in London including the officials at the Department for Education, researchers, headteachers (i.e., school principals) and others. In our new Brown Center Policy Brief, we describe five lessons the U.S. can learn from England, which we briefly discuss here.”
The US charter school movement should
learn from England’s academy system
Brookings/BROWN CENTER
CHALKBOARD by Helen
F. Ladd and Edward B. Fiske
Monday, November 7, 2016Helen F. Ladd Nonresident Senior Fellow - Governance Studies, Brown Center on Education Policy Edward B. Fiske Former Education Editor - The New York Times
As charter schools celebrate 25 years as part of the U.S. public education system, there has been a dramatic shift in the public debate about their role. Until recently, most discussion has centered around the horse race question of how well students in charters perform in comparison to peers in traditional public schools. But growing attention is now being paid to questions of whether and how to control the growth of charter schools so that they best serve the interests of all students. For example, the NAACP recently called for a moratorium on new charters in communities with large numbers of African Americans, while voters in Massachusetts are now being asked to vote on Tuesday, November 8 on a ballot initiative to remove the cap on the number of charter schools in that state.
Charter schools originated as
means of introducing educational innovation while remaining on the fringes of
local school systems. As their numbers have grown, however, charters have moved
from the fringes to being major players in the public school landscape in many
cities. This movement raises important policy questions about how charters and
traditional public schools can coexist to ensure the best education for
students in the United States.
Testing
Resistance & Reform News: November 2 - 8, 2016
Submitted by fairtest on
November 8, 2016 - 12:49pm
This Election Day, education
issues are not center stage for most top-of-the-ticket candidates. But down
ballot, teachers, parents and community have put testing policies into play in
many state and local races. And, grassroots activists know that, whatever
voters decide today, the assessment reform movement will continue to pressure
elected officials for fewer standardized exams, an end to high-stakes test
misuse, and support for better assessments.
Tweet from Philly Mayor’s Office of Education
Want the latest on #CommunitySchools and #PHLpreK? Sign up for our newsletter to get up-to-date info about #PHLed
http://bit.ly/2dpkGkn
PASA, PSBA, PAIU, PARSS, the PA
Principals Association and PASBO are traveling around the state to conduct
regional workshops for school leaders to provide them with more information on
the new basic education funding formula. Register below to attend one of 8
regional workshops to learn more about the new formula and what it means for
your school district and for the state. Please note that capacity is limited at
each location and registration is required. A webcast option is also available.
These regional workshops are being supported by a grant from the William Penn
Foundation.
Monday, November 14, 2016 @ 6:00 pm: Colonial IU 20 (6 Danforth Drive, Easton, PA 18045)
Tuesday, November 29, 2016 @ 9:00 am: Luzerne IU 18
(368 Tioga Ave, Kingston, PA 18704)
Tuesday, December 6, 2016 @ 6:00 pm: Chester County IU 24
(455 Boot Road, Downingtown, PA 19335)
Wednesday, November 16, 2016 @ 9:30 am: Webcast
Registration: https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/BEFworkshop
Join us for a public forum featuring state, city and civic leaders sponsored by Philadelphia Media Network, the Philadelphia Public School Notebook and Drexel University's School of Education.
Creese Student Center 3210 Chestnut St. Philadelphia, PA 19104
It's been 15 years since the state took control of Philadelphia's schools and created the School Reform Commission. Since then, the SRC has been a polarizing presence in the city.
With the recent resignation of two members of the commission and the term of a third expiring soon, the future of the SRC and the issue of school governance is once again at the forefront of the civic dialogue. Is the SRC the only model to consider? Should Philadelphia create an elected school board, or should the governing body be controlled by the Mayor? Are there models in other cities that could help us rethink our own school governance? The Philadelphia Public School Notebook, Philadelphia Media Network -- owner of the Philadelphia Inquirer, Philadelphia Daily News and philly.com, and Drexel University's School of Education are hosting a public forum on this critical issue.
RSVP - Admission is free, but you must register in advance. Register now, and find out more about the panelists and other details at our registration page. https://www.eventbrite.com/e/who-should-run-philadelphias-schools-tickets-28926705555
Share
your interest in volunteering with PSBA
Complete this form to share your
interest in volunteering with PSBA
NSBA Advocacy
Institute 2017 -- Jan. 29-31, Washington, D.C.
Join school directors around the country at the conference designed to give you the tools to advocate successfully on behalf of public education.
Join school directors around the country at the conference designed to give you the tools to advocate successfully on behalf of public education.
- NSBA will help you develop a winning
advocacy strategy to help you in Washington, D.C. and at home.
- Attend timely and topical breakout
sessions lead by NSBA’s knowledgeable staff and outside experts.
- Expand your advocacy network by swapping
best practices, challenges, and successes with other school board members
from across the country.
This
event is open to members of the Federal Relations Network. To find out how you can join,
contact Jamie.Zuvich@psba.org.
Learn more about the Advocacy Institute at https://www.nsba.org/events/advocacy-institute.
Register now
for the 2017 NSBA Annual Conference
Plan to join public education leaders for networking and learning at the 2017 NSBA Annual Conference, March 25-27 in Denver, CO. General registration is now open at https://www.nsba.org/conference/registration. A conference schedule, including pre-conference workshops, is available on the NSBA website.
Plan to join public education leaders for networking and learning at the 2017 NSBA Annual Conference, March 25-27 in Denver, CO. General registration is now open at https://www.nsba.org/conference/registration. A conference schedule, including pre-conference workshops, is available on the NSBA website.
SAVE THE DATE LWVPA Convention 2017 June
1-4, 2017
Join the
League of Women Voters of PA for our 2017 Biennial Convention at the beautiful
Inn at Pocono Manor!
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.