Daily postings from the Keystone State Education Coalition now
reach more than 3900 Pennsylvania education policymakers – school directors,
administrators, legislators, legislative and congressional staffers, Governor's
staff, current/former PA Secretaries of Education, Wolf education transition
team members, Superintendents, PTO/PTA officers, parent advocates, teacher
leaders, business leaders, faith-based organizations, labor organizations,
education professors, members of the press and a broad array of P-16 regulatory
agencies, professional associations and education advocacy organizations via
emails, website, Facebook, Twitter and LinkedIn
These daily emails are archived and searchable at http://keystonestateeducationcoalition.org
Follow us on Twitter at @lfeinberg
Keystone
State Education Coalition
PA
Ed Policy Roundup September 12, 2016:
School
funding lawsuit set for hearing Tuesday
Southeastern
PA Regional 2016 Legislative Roundtable: William Tennent High School (Bucks
Co.) SEP 22, 2016 • 7:00 PM - 9:00 PM
Auditor
General DePasquale slated to be Keynote Speaker
School Leaders from Northampton,
Lehigh, Bucks, Montco, Chesco, Delco and Philadelphia Counties encouraged to
attend.
More info & Registration: https://www.psba.org/event/2016-legislative-roundtable/
“Toward that end, school board members Michael Faccinetto,
Lawrence A. Feinberg and Mark B. Miller, along with Nathan Mains of PSBA, Jim
Buckheit of PASA and Tina Viletto of MCIU, have put together a forum for that
discussion on Thursday evening, Sept. 22, in Bucks Co. The meeting will be held
at William Tennent High School in Centennial SD. Registration will open at 6:30
p.m. and allow an opportunity for networking. The forum will begin promptly at
7 p.m. Among those leading the discussion will
be PA Auditor General Eugene DePasquale (charter and public school
accountability) and PA House Finance Chairman Bernie O’Neill (special education
funding).”
Southeastern PA Regional
2016 Legislative Roundtable: William Tennent High School (Bucks Co.) SEP 22,
2016 • 7:00 PM - 9:00 PM
PSBA Email
Public education in Pennsylvania
and across the nation is ever changing. We continually improve and modify as
state law, social norms and educational theory change. Educational stakeholder
groups believe the conversation of educational issues, particularly charter
reform, should continue, rather than become an obstacle to finalizing state
budgets.
Toward that end, school
board members Michael Faccinetto, Lawrence A. Feinberg and Mark B. Miller,
along with Nathan Mains of PSBA, Jim Buckheit of PASA and Tina Viletto of MCIU,
have put together a forum for that discussion on Thursday evening, Sept. 22, in
Bucks Co. The meeting will be held at William Tennent High School in Centennial
SD. Registration will open at 6:30 p.m. and allow an opportunity for
networking. The forum will begin promptly at 7 p.m. Among those leading the
discussion will be PA Auditor General Eugene DePasquale (charter and public
school accountability) and PA House Finance Chairman Bernie O’Neill (special
education funding). We have already received commitments to attend from several
other area legislators and public education advocates who cover Bucks, Chester,
Delaware, Lehigh, Montgomery, Northampton counties and Philadelphia. Other
topics will include local control, ethics and overall funding issues. To the extent possible, those who attend will
be seated at a table together with the legislators from their areas to
facilitate a dialogue about the impact of each topic on the participating
school district(s) in particular. As always, local issues and impact may differ
based on a number of factors. Our format
for the evening will be to have brief topic presentations by leaders in each
category, followed by roundtable discussions with participants concerning local
impact. After the roundtable session, legislators will have the opportunity to
speak briefly to the group concerning what they learned and share their
perspective.
More info & Registration: https://www.psba.org/event/2016-legislative-roundtable/
Public school pays off for Philly family
Inquirer by Kristen A. Graham, Staff Writer Updated: SEPTEMBER 12, 2016 1:08 AM EDT
Choosing to send their older son
to a city public school four years ago was a leap of faith for Jill and Mark
Scott. Like so many young families, the
Scotts were devoted to Philadelphia but not fully sold on its school system;
from Henry's infancy, people warned them that they would have to move or spend
big on private school. Henry attended a
charter for kindergarten; he even won a coveted spot at Independence Charter
School for first grade. But his community-minded parents wanted to believe in
their neighborhood school, so they passed on Independence and gave E.M. Stanton
a shot. The result? Their boy "has done as well as we could
have hoped for him anywhere; the education has been fantastic," Mark Scott
said. Henry just entered fifth grade at prestigious Masterman, a district
magnet, and Rhett, his younger brother, starts kindergarten at Stanton this
week. "We have no regrets,"
said Jill Scott. In the years they took
a chance on public school, the Scotts have become evangelists for the cause.
Don't assume your neighborhood public school isn't an option, they tell
families like theirs who toy with the idea of leaving the city or considering
private or charter schools. Consider neighborhood schools, and not just the
names everyone knows.
“We know firsthand the grave disparities
that exist between poor and wealthy schools in Pennsylvania. We moved into the
William Penn School District a few years ago to buy a home to accommodate our
growing family. Before that, we lived in Upper Moreland, an affluent township
in Montgomery County with a larger tax base. According to the latest available
data, which is for the 2014-15 school year, the Upper Moreland School District
has $2,600 more available per year to spend on each student than William Penn,
despite the fact that William Penn's student population needs more resources,
not less. In our daughter's middle school, 75 percent of students are
economically disadvantaged, compared with 30 percent of students in the middle
school she would have attended in Upper Moreland.”
Commentary: Why we sued over our
daughter's education
Inquirer Letter by Jamella and Bryant Miller Updated: SEPTEMBER
12, 2016 3:01 AM EDT
OUR 13-YEAR-OLD daughter is just
starting eighth grade at Penn Wood Middle School in the William Penn School
District near our home in Delaware County. Her favorite subjects are science
and math. But her school cannot support 21st-century science and math programs.
In past school years, there were no textbooks for students to take home, so she
would bring home worksheets that were not very challenging. There were no fancy
robotics or technology programs. And the average size of her classes ranged
from 28 to 35 students. She and our two other children, along with 5,000 other
students in the district, have missed out on important curriculum because
Pennsylvania's Legislature is severely underfunding our schools. As parents, we will do what we can to try to
ensure our kids have a bright future. That's why we joined with families,
school districts and advocacy groups from across Pennsylvania in 2014 to file a
lawsuit against the state for failing to uphold our state constitution, which
requires the legislature to provide a "thorough and efficient system of
public education." Soon, our
children will move one step closer to having their day in court. On Tuesday, in
Philadelphia's City Hall, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court will hear oral
argument to determine whether our case will get a full trial. We want a trial,
so that we can show just how deeply our schools are plagued by the state's
broken school funding methods. We want the court to step in, hold state
officials accountable, and protect the fundamental right all Pennsylvania
children have to a high-quality education.
School funding lawsuit set for hearing
Tuesday
The justices will be asked to
determine if they should intervene. Gov. Wolf says no.
The notebook by Dale Mezzacappa September
9, 2016 — 5:12pm
A two-year-old lawsuit that seeks
to revamp how schools are funded in Pennsylvania will come to the state Supreme
Court on Tuesday, with the justices hearing clashing arguments on whether they
have the authority – and the obligation – to inject themselves into what is a
critically important but politically explosive issue. The six school districts, seven parents, and
two advocacy organizations bringing the case say that the justices have a legal
and moral duty to take action. Represented by the Education Law Center and the
Public Interest Law Center, the plaintiffs argue that if they don't, the court
is allowing the General Assembly and Governor to evade their constitutional
responsibility to guarantee a “thorough and efficient” education for all of
Pennsylvania’s schoolchildren. The state
counters that school funding is a legislative responsibility and that the
courts have no jurisdiction in the matter. Last year Commonwealth Court
dismissed the suit on those grounds, and the plaintiffs are appealing that ruling. Along with a wide array of
supporters from the civic and religious communities, the plaintiffs, which
include rural, suburban and urban districts, cite vast disparities in available
resources among Pennsylvania’s schools and persistent achievement gaps among
students of different ethnic groups and socio-economic status.
State Supreme Court to hear school funding lawsuit
Morning Call by Steve Esack Contact Reporter Call Harrisburg Bureau September 11, 2016
Pa State Supreme Court to hear school funding lawsuit on Tuesday
HARRISBURG — In the 2012 election he won to become governor, Tom Wolfcampaigned on a promise to increase education funding far beyond that of his predecessor. Now, just 21 months into his first term Wolf is heading to court to defend his education spending record. On Tuesday, Wolf's Democratic administration and the Republican-controlled Legislature will try to persuade the Pennsylvania Supreme Court to reject a lawsuit that would compel the state to provide more money to public schools. The lawsuit, which Wolf inherited from GOP Gov. Tom Corbett, claims the governor and lawmakers fail in their constitutional requirement to properly fund public schools while forcing them to abide by various academic and graduation standards. Filed by seven parents and six school districts, the lawsuit was previously dismissed by Commonwealth Court. Tuesday's oral arguments before the Supreme Court is an appeal of the dismissal and seeks a trial on the case.
http://www.mcall.com/news/nationworld/pennsylvania/mc-pa-supreme-court-school-funding-lawsuit-20160911-story.html
“The plaintiffs include the Pennsylvania Association of Rural and Small Schools, the NAACP Pennsylvania State Conference, six school districts (William Penn, Panther Valley, Lancaster, Greater Johnstown, Wilkes-Barre Area and Shenandoah Valley) and seven parents. The Philadelphia School District is not part of the suit, however two of parents in the case have children who attend Philadelphia schools.”
State Supreme Court to hear school funding lawsuit
Philly Trib by Ryanne Persinger Tribune Staff Writer Posted: September 10, 2016 12:00 am
The state Supreme Court will hear oral arguments regarding fair funding of public schools in Pennsylvania on Tuesday at City Hall. Attorneys for plaintiffs in the 2014 case of William Penn School District vs. Pennsylvania Department of Education, which was dismissed in 2015, will present their arguments at the 9 a.m. hearing. The plaintiffs, represented by the Public Interest Law Center of Philadelphia and the Education Law Center-PA, are requesting that the court’s decision be reversed. In doing so, they said it would allow them to present evidence showing how the General Assembly had violated the Pennsylvania Constitution. They filed the lawsuit two years ago against then-Republican Gov. Tom Corbett and other legislative leaders, alleging that for decades the General Assembly has failed to provide schoolchildren the resources needed for a quality education.
Gov. Wolf: School funding better but still
more to do
Inquirer Opinion by Governor Tom Wolf Updated: SEPTEMBER 11, 2016 — 3:01
AM EDT
With a brand-new school year
underway for the vast majority of Pennsylvania students, it's important to
recognize that the way the commonwealth funds its schools has changed
significantly - and for the better. In
June, I signed Act 35 into law. It established a fair funding formula for the
commonwealth's 500 school districts, and allocates funds in two ways: Schools
first receive the same amount received in the previous year, then additional
funding is distributed via student-specific factors. At the same time, the new formula distributes
all additional basic education funding dollars through dynamic student and
district-based factors, including local tax revenue capacity, student
population size and density, and the number of students living in poverty. Act 35 is also unique in that it requires the
funding formula to be continually implemented in coming school years, as no
previous funding plans under previous administrations could accomplish. I understand that many Pennsylvania school
districts are still hurting from massive layoffs and program cuts that occurred
in 2011 under the previous administration. Among them is the William Penn
School District in Delaware County, which filed a court case in 2014 against
several parties, including the state Department of Education, the General
Assembly, and then-Gov. Tom Corbett.
The state Supreme Court must hear the voices of children who are being denied the education they deserve
Post Gazette Opinion By Joan Duvall Flynn September 11, 2016 12:00 AM
Joan Duvall Flynn is president of the Pennsylvania conference of
the NAACP.
The future of public education in
Pennsylvania has reached a day of reckoning. For far too long, far too many of
Pennsylvania’s children have been forced to live with insufficient schooling
due to insufficient funding. While the damage done cannot be reversed, it is
time to create a more just and beneficial system. It is time to provide all
students with sustained, long-term investments and to give them the
high-quality education they deserve. On
Tuesday, together with parents, school districts and advocates from across the
state, the NAACP of Pennsylvania will go before the Pennsylvania Supreme Court
with a critical request: Let our children have their day in court to fight for
their fundamental right to a high-quality public education. The Pennsylvania Constitution requires that
the state provide a “thorough and efficient system of public education” to
serve schoolchildren across our commonwealth. Despite this clear directive,
many schools cannot offer curriculum and support services mandated by law and
needed to give our children a first-rate education.
Erie
schools leader supports lawsuit seeking funding reform
ERIE TIMES-NEWS By Valerie
Myers 814-878-1913 etnmyers September 11, 2016
02:01 AM
Erie schools Superintendent Jay
Badams hopes a lawsuit before the Pennsylvania Supreme Court may one day result
in increased funding for Erie schools and others statewide. The lawsuit asks the judiciary to fix the
state's "inequitable" education funding system. The court will hear
oral arguments in the case Tuesday in Philadelphia. Badams and a small contingent from Erie plan
to be in the courtroom or in an overflow area provided for the public. "I certainly am very interested in the
arguments themselves, but I definitely also want to show support," Badams
said. Erie School District has been
faced with huge annual operating deficits. Officials balanced the 2016-17 schools
budget with a $3.3 million increase in state basic education funding and a $4
million emergency allocation not yet received. The district anticipates an $8
million to $10 million deficit in 2017-18.
District officials already are looking at massive program cuts and the
possibility of closing Erie's four public high schools to reduce costs next
school year.
NYT
Editorial: A Holistic Ruling on Broken Schools
New
York Times Editorial By THE EDITORIAL BOARDSEPT. 12, 2016
Over the last four decades,
courts in many states have ruled that school funding formulas violate their
state constitutions by denying children in poor communities the opportunity to
receive an effective education. These
rulings have focused mainly on money. But a sweeping opinion issued
last week by
a state judge in Connecticut went beyond criticizing funding policies. He
ordered the state to revamp major aspects of the system — including special
education services, teacher evaluations and hollow requirements that “in some
places have nearly destroyed the meaning of high school graduation and left
children rising from elementary school to high school without knowing how to
read, write and do math well enough to move up.” The blistering ruling should
shame lawmakers, who have for decades looked away from the problem of
educational inequality. The ruling, by
Judge Thomas Moukawsher of State Superior Court in Hartford, came in response
to a lawsuit filed more than a decade ago by a group claiming that the state
school funding system was unconstitutional and unfair to poor communities. The
judge agreed, but he left it to legislators to determine how much money should
be spent on education statewide. He nevertheless criticized the way the
Legislature amended the 2016 budget and cut funding to several poor districts,
like Bridgeport and Hartford, while preserving increases to wealthier towns —
without explanation or reference to a formula.
This
District May Close All Of Its High Schools, But It's About Much More Than Money
NPR Heard on All
Things Considered by KEVIN
MCCORRY September 11, 20164:05 PM ET
In northwest Pennsylvania, along
the edge of Lake Erie, you'll find the city of Erie.
There, the superintendent of the
more than 12,000 student district has forwarded a plan that's causing a stir —
calling for leaders to consider shutting down all of the district's high
schools and sending students to the wealthier, whiter, suburban districts. Why?
Superintendent Jay Badams says
it's a "matter of fairness." Erie's schools have been pushed
to the brink after six years of deep budget cuts, and he believes the children
in the city's district — which predominantly serves students of color — are
being systematically shortchanged. That's
in part because urban school districts in Pennsylvania face a particularly
brutal logic. They serve the poorest,
most needy students. Yet, when it comes to state funding per pupil, most of
them don't
make the top of the list. Even
though Erie is one of the most impoverished districts in the state, and has one
of the highest percentages of English language learners, the district currently
receives less per-pupil funding from the state than hundreds of other
districts.
09 Sep 2016 — Erie
Times-News ed.palattella@timesnews.com
The Erie School District will
gets lots of early help as it tries to avoid a financial crisis in its 2017-18
budget, due July 1. Area superintendents
and legislators who met Thursday over the district's problems plan to convene
as often as once a month to work on solutions, said Erie County Executive Kathy
Dahlkemper, who organized the closed meeting.
"There are no easy answers," she said afterward. Dahlkemper said about 40 officials attended
the two-and-one-half-hour session, at the county's public safety building in
Summit Township. She said one of the group's main goals will be to push for
changes to charter school funding. Erie
schools Superintendent Jay Badams has identified charter school costs - about
$23 million in 2016-17 - as a primary reason for the district's budget deficit,
which he predicted could be $8 million to $10 million in 2017-18, without major
cuts or an increase in state funding. Lawmakers
need to address charter school reform "on a statewide level,"
Dahlkemper said.
Acting to change in face of bullying that
targets Asian-American, Pacific Islander kids
WHYY Newsworks BY ANNE HOFFMAN SEPTEMBER 12, 2016
After a White House task force
found Asian-American and Pacific Islander kids are targeted by bullies, it has
offered recommendations to students, teachers and communities on ways to defuse
that harassment. The findings resonate
in the Delaware Valley because of race-based attacks on Asian students
attending South Philadelphia High School in 2009. The task force convened, in part, because
community groups were reporting a high number of bullying incidents, but the
national data looked different, said actor and task force member Maulik
Pancholy. "We had all this
information and yet, on the national level, the information we had in terms of
percentages being reported were that Asian students reported being bullied at a
rate of about 9.2 percent," he said. "Something didn't add up." Through 29 listening sessions — including one
at South Philadelphia High School — the task force found kids could be reticent
when it came to talking about the issue with parents or faculty. They were
afraid adults wouldn't understand, or that parents had too much on their plates
already.
Balancing
Act: School districts and the problems with PSERS
The Almanac By Harry Funk Published:
August 19, 2016 - Updated: August 26, 2016 4:48 pm
As the end of August approaches,
so does the deadline for paying your school taxes at a discount. Still, that’s going to be one large number on
the check, thanks to the large numbers it takes to run a school district these
days. “Any increases in the operations
and cost of education are borne largely by the taxpayer,” Jeannine French said.
“And we have a responsibility to make sure that the people in our community can
continue to afford to live in our community and are not unduly burdened.” The Peters Township School District
superintendent summed up one aspect of the balancing act that administrators
and elected officials face throughout Pennsylvania each year: how to cover
perpetually increasing expenditures using relatively scarce resources, all
within the parameters set by state legislation.
One particular piece of legislation, although formulated with the best
of intentions, started the ball rolling toward what has become a financial nightmare
for school districts.
Post Gazette Letter by OLIVER J. DRUMHELLER Monroeville September 11, 2016 12:00 AM
The writer is a former Gateway
School Board member.
The letter from Ira Weiss (“Pa.’s
Law on Charter Schools Needs to Be Changed,” Sept. 6) is spot on. All his
points are correct and reflect his public school expertise. Charter schools do use scarce tax dollars to
advertise, calling themselves “tuition-free public schools” and “free public
schools.” These are untruthful statements and are misleading to the taxpayers.
Examples are readily available in the media, websites, print and banners in
public spaces. These practices need to
be investigated by the Pennsylvania Department of Education’s newly established
Division of Charter Schools and other state agencies. Note that charter schools are not free; they
are public schools (having unelected corporate boards) and are paid for by
local school districts. These payments are made per student from the child’s
home school district. If charters and cyber-charters were free, why would
public schools be required to pay for them? These payments are made from funds
collected primarily from local property taxpayers. This raises a serious
question of honesty and ethics: If you falsely advertise about being
tuition-free, how can you be entrusted with children’s education and to responsibly
use our public funding? I strongly
support investigation and correction of these wrongful practices as soon as
possible!
Lancaster Online The LNP
Editorial Board September12, 2016
THE ISSUE: A suburban
Philadelphia judge rolled back a tax increase two weeks ago in a move that has
school officials statewide wondering if their districts might be next.
Montgomery County Judge Joseph A. Smyth ordered the Lower Merion School
District to revoke a 4.4 percent tax hike because, he said, the district misled
taxpayers by projecting large budget deficits to justify tax increases. Good luck trying to convince taxpayers, especially in Lancaster
County, that rolling back a tax increase is a bad thing. Fifteen of 16 county districts increased taxes, again, in
2016-17. In fact, some school officials are worried that the wheels already are
turning in the minds of county taxpayers.
“If they are successful down there,” said Superintendent Bob Hollister
of the Eastern Lancaster County School District, “I’m willing to bet at least
one taxpayer in every school district would be willing to launch a challenge.”
MAP:
How experienced are the teachers in your school district?
By Eugene Tauber The Morning Call September 12, 2016
The Pennsylvania Department of
Education reports on the average number of years that teachers have spent in
the classroom. Numbers are included for all teaching experience and for
experience in the current district. The average classroom teacher statewide has
been in his or her district for 11.8 years, and 13.2 years teaching in any
district. The table under the map shows
that teaching experience has increased in most of the 17 Lehigh Valley school
districts over the past five years. Many districts have faced budget pressures
that have resulted in reductions in staff, mostly from the less-experienced
personnel. In addition, many districts have seen a decline in enrollment as
Pennsylvania’s school age population stagnates. Reduction in enrollment has
also caused staff reductions. Other
districts have seen a spike in retirements which lowers the average as the most
experienced teachers are replaced by less-experienced or neophyte teachers. The
table is sorted by local district experience.
State
Capitol newsroom loses a veteran
Morning
Call by Steve
Esack Contact Reporter Call Harrisburg
Bureau September 10, 2016
If you visit the 110-year-old
state Capitol and walk up the grand marble Rotunda steps you will see a
darkened room labeled “Newspaper Correspondents.” The sign is a little dated for the 21st
century. But it points to the partitioned offices of print, television and
online reporters who cover state government and work under the
quasi-cooperative moniker of the Pennsylvania Legislative Correspondents'
Association. On Friday, our association
said goodbye to one its most senior reporters, Brad Bumsted of the Pittsburgh
Tribune-Review. Bumsted, 65, packed up after taking a financial buyout package
offered by his company, Trib Total Media.
Schools facing dilemmas over
disparities in discipline policies are turning to an approach known as
restorative practices, focusing on how to repair harm done.
American Public Media Reports August
25, 2016 | by Laurie Stern
Last year, sophomore Noah Peña
brought his new brass knuckles to school. He didn't feel threatened; he just
thought they were cool. But they fell out of his pocket and Noah got sent to
the principal's office. He could have
been expelled. But because he goes to high school in Denver, the principal took
a different approach — he met with Noah and his dad. Noah agreed to reflect on
his poor judgment and write down his thoughts. He also promised to work harder
in school so he could get into AP biology.
"It kind of gave me the chance to be welcomed back into my community,"
Noah said. Many schools and districts
across the country are struggling
to reform their discipline policies, and Denver was among the earliest to
adopt what are called restorative practices districtwide. Research shows zero
tolerance doesn't work and exacerbates racial disparities. Denver gave up zero
tolerance in 2008, and it has tightened its racial discipline gap since then. The specifics of restorative practices vary
but they center on the idea of repairing the harm that someone's actions have
caused.
Money,
Race and Success: How Your School District Compares
New
York Times By MOTOKO RICH, AMANDA
COX and MATTHEW BLOCH APRIL 29, 2016
Sixth graders in the richest
school districts are four grade levels ahead of children in the poorest
districts.
We’ve long known of the
persistent and troublesome academic gap between white students and their black
and Hispanic peers in public schools. We’ve
long understood the primary reason, too: A higher proportion of black and
Hispanic children come from poor families. A new analysis of reading and math test
score data from across the country confirms just how much socioeconomic
conditions matter. Children in the
school districts with the highest concentrations of poverty score an average of
more than four grade levels below children in the richest districts. (Reliable
estimates were not available for Asian-Americans.) Even more sobering, the analysis shows that
the largest gaps between white children and their minority classmates emerge in
some of the wealthiest communities, such as Berkeley, Calif.; Chapel Hill,
N.C.; and Evanston, Ill. The study, by Sean F. Reardon, Demetra Kalogrides and Kenneth Shores of
Stanford, also reveals large academic gaps in places like Atlanta, which has a
high level of segregation in the public schools.
‘If this guy is elected, you can kiss
public schools goodbye’
Washington Post Answer Sheet
Blog By Valerie
Strauss September 10 at 5:00 PM
“There is no failed policy more in need of
urgent change than our government-run education monopoly.”
With that line from his big
education policy speech on Thursday, Republican presidential candidate Donald
Trump placed himself firmly in the camp of school “reformers” who want to
break up the public education system in America. Trump declared his intent to use public funds
for students to attend private schools and to promote the growth of charter
schools, employing the language of Republicans who refuse to call public
schools public schools and instead refer to them as “government-run education
monopolies.” (Former
Florida governor Jeb Bush is a leader in this, often calling public
schools “government-run monopolies run by unions.” Let’s ignore the irony of
Trump using the same language as Bush, whom Trump mocked during the GOP
primaries.) Trump said he would take $20
billion in federal funding — though he didn’t make clear where he would get it
from — to establish block grants that states can use to help children
in low-income families enroll at private and charter schools. In a somewhat mixed
message, he said that although states would be able to use the money
as they saw fit, he would push them to use it for school choice. He didn’t
say how he would push.
PA Supreme Court sets Sept. 13 argument
date for fair education funding lawsuit in Philly
Thorough
and Efficient Blog JUNE 16, 2016 BARBGRIMALDI LEAVE A COMMENT
Education
Law Center: Join us September 19: UC-Berkeley economist Rucker Johnson in
Philadelphia
September 19: Please join us at 4:30 PM in
the Mayor’s Reception Room in Philadelphia City Hall where economist and
UC-Berkeley professor Dr. Rucker Johnson will discuss his recent national research which finds that sustained
investment in education produces long-term economic benefits for communities.
Mayor Kenney and Dr. Hite will also make brief remarks. This event is sponsored
by the Education Law Center, The Mayor’s Office of Education, and Council
President Darrell Clarke. Please spread the word and join us on the 19th! RSVP
to Caitlyn Boyle: Caitlyn.Boyle@Phila.gov
To download the full invitation
to the event, please click here.
Southeastern
PA Regional 2016 Legislative Roundtable: William Tennent High School (Bucks
Co.) SEP 22, 2016 • 7:00
PM - 9:00 PM
PSBA website August 25, 2016
Take a more active role in public
education advocacy by joining our Legislative Roundtable
This is your opportunity for a
seat at the table (literally) with fellow public education advocates to take an
active role in educating each other and policymakers. Auditor General Eugene DePasquale, along with
regional legislators, will be in attendance to work with you to support public
education in Pennsylvania. Use the
form below to send your registration information!
Thursday, September 29, 2016 at 5:30 PM
The Crystal Tea Room, The Wanamaker Building
100 Penn Square East, Philadelphia, PA
Honoring: Pepper Hamilton LLP, Signe Wilkinson, Dr. Monique W. Morris
And presenting the ELC PRO BONO AWARD to Paul Saint-Antoine & Chanda Miller
of Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP
Registration
for the PASA-PSBA School Leadership Conference Oct. 13-15 is now open
The conference
is your opportunity to learn, network and be inspired by peers and
experts.
TO REGISTER: See https://www.psba.org/members-area/store-registration/ (you must be logged in to
the Members Area to register). You can read more on How to Register for
a PSBA Event here. CONFERENCE WEBSITE: For
all other program details, schedules, exhibits, etc., see the conference
website:www.paschoolleaders.org.
The 2016 Arts and Education Symposium will be held on October 27 at the Radisson Hotel Harrisburg Convention Center. Sponsored by the Pennsylvania Arts Education network and EPLC, the Symposium is a Unique Networking and Learning Opportunity for:
·
Arts Educators
·
School Leaders
·
Artists
·
Arts and Culture Community Leaders
·
Arts-related Business Leaders
·
Arts Education Faculty and Administrators in Higher Education
·
Advocates
·
State and Local Policy Leaders
Act 48 Credit is
available.Program and registration information are available here.
PA Principals Association website Tuesday, August 2, 2016 10:43 AM
To receive the Early Bird Discount, you must be registered by August 31, 2016:
Members: $300 Non-Members: $400
Featuring Three National Keynote Speakers: Eric Sheninger, Jill Jackson & Salome Thomas-EL
PSBA
Officer Elections Aug. 15-Oct. 3, 2016: Slate of Candidates
PSBA members seeking election to
office for the association were required to submit a nomination form no later
than April 30, 2016, to be considered. All candidates who properly completed
applications by the deadline are included on the slate of candidates below. In
addition, the Leadership Development Committee met on June 24 at PSBA
headquarters in Mechanicsburg to interview candidates. According to bylaws, the
Leadership Development Committee may determine candidates highly qualified for
the office they seek. This is noted next to each person’s name with an asterisk
(*). Each school entity will have one
vote for each officer. This will require boards of the various school entities
to come to a consensus on each candidate and cast their vote electronically
during the open voting period (Aug. 15-Oct. 3, 2016). Voting will be
accomplished through a secure third-party, web-based voting site that will
require a password login. One person from each member school entity will be
authorized as the official person to cast the vote on behalf of his or her
school entity. In the case of school districts, it will be the board secretary
who will cast votes on behalf of the school board.
Special note: Boards should be
sure to include discussion and voting on candidates to its agenda during one of
its meetings in September.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.